Cargando…
Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study
BACKGROUND: Although many anti-diabetic drugs have been used to control hyperglycemia for decades, the efficacy of commonly-used oral glucose-lowering agents in Korean type 2 diabetic patients has yet to be clearly demonstrated. METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of glimepiride, metformin, and rosig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Diabetes Association
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21537410 http://dx.doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2011.35.1.26 |
_version_ | 1782202121523822592 |
---|---|
author | Yoon, Kun Ho Shin, Jeong Ah Kwon, Hyuk Sang Lee, Seung Hwan Min, Kyung Wan Ahn, Yu Bae Yoo, Soon Jib Ahn, Kyu Jeung Park, Sung Woo Lee, Kwan Woo Sung, Yeon Ah Park, Tae Sun Kim, Min Seon Kim, Yong Ki Nam, Moon Suk Kim, Hye Soon Park, Ie Byung Park, Jong Suk Woo, Jeong Taek Son, Ho Young |
author_facet | Yoon, Kun Ho Shin, Jeong Ah Kwon, Hyuk Sang Lee, Seung Hwan Min, Kyung Wan Ahn, Yu Bae Yoo, Soon Jib Ahn, Kyu Jeung Park, Sung Woo Lee, Kwan Woo Sung, Yeon Ah Park, Tae Sun Kim, Min Seon Kim, Yong Ki Nam, Moon Suk Kim, Hye Soon Park, Ie Byung Park, Jong Suk Woo, Jeong Taek Son, Ho Young |
author_sort | Yoon, Kun Ho |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although many anti-diabetic drugs have been used to control hyperglycemia for decades, the efficacy of commonly-used oral glucose-lowering agents in Korean type 2 diabetic patients has yet to be clearly demonstrated. METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of glimepiride, metformin, and rosiglitazone as initial treatment for drug-naïve type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a 48-week, double-blind, randomized controlled study that included 349 Korean patients. Our primary goal was to determine the change in HbA1c levels from baseline to end point. Our secondary goal was to evaluate changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels, body weight, frequency of adverse events, and the proportion of participants achieving target HbA1c levels. RESULTS: HbA1c levels decreased from 7.8% to 6.9% in the glimepiride group (P<0.001), from 7.9% to 7.0% in the metformin group (P<0.001), and from 7.8% to 7.0% (P<0.001) in the rosiglitazone group. Glimepiride and rosiglitazone significantly increased body weight and metformin reduced body weight during the study period. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was more frequent in the glimepiride group and diarrhea was more frequent in the metformin group. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of glimepiride, metformin, and rosiglitazone as antidiabetic monotherapies in drug-naïve Korean type 2 diabetic patients was similar in the three groups, with no statistical difference. This study is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of commonly-used oral hypoglycemic agents in Korean type 2 diabetic patients. An additional subgroup analysis is recommended to obtain more detailed information. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3080564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Korean Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30805642011-05-02 Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study Yoon, Kun Ho Shin, Jeong Ah Kwon, Hyuk Sang Lee, Seung Hwan Min, Kyung Wan Ahn, Yu Bae Yoo, Soon Jib Ahn, Kyu Jeung Park, Sung Woo Lee, Kwan Woo Sung, Yeon Ah Park, Tae Sun Kim, Min Seon Kim, Yong Ki Nam, Moon Suk Kim, Hye Soon Park, Ie Byung Park, Jong Suk Woo, Jeong Taek Son, Ho Young Diabetes Metab J Original Article BACKGROUND: Although many anti-diabetic drugs have been used to control hyperglycemia for decades, the efficacy of commonly-used oral glucose-lowering agents in Korean type 2 diabetic patients has yet to be clearly demonstrated. METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of glimepiride, metformin, and rosiglitazone as initial treatment for drug-naïve type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a 48-week, double-blind, randomized controlled study that included 349 Korean patients. Our primary goal was to determine the change in HbA1c levels from baseline to end point. Our secondary goal was to evaluate changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels, body weight, frequency of adverse events, and the proportion of participants achieving target HbA1c levels. RESULTS: HbA1c levels decreased from 7.8% to 6.9% in the glimepiride group (P<0.001), from 7.9% to 7.0% in the metformin group (P<0.001), and from 7.8% to 7.0% (P<0.001) in the rosiglitazone group. Glimepiride and rosiglitazone significantly increased body weight and metformin reduced body weight during the study period. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was more frequent in the glimepiride group and diarrhea was more frequent in the metformin group. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of glimepiride, metformin, and rosiglitazone as antidiabetic monotherapies in drug-naïve Korean type 2 diabetic patients was similar in the three groups, with no statistical difference. This study is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of commonly-used oral hypoglycemic agents in Korean type 2 diabetic patients. An additional subgroup analysis is recommended to obtain more detailed information. Korean Diabetes Association 2011-02 2011-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3080564/ /pubmed/21537410 http://dx.doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2011.35.1.26 Text en Copyright © 2011 Korean Diabetes Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yoon, Kun Ho Shin, Jeong Ah Kwon, Hyuk Sang Lee, Seung Hwan Min, Kyung Wan Ahn, Yu Bae Yoo, Soon Jib Ahn, Kyu Jeung Park, Sung Woo Lee, Kwan Woo Sung, Yeon Ah Park, Tae Sun Kim, Min Seon Kim, Yong Ki Nam, Moon Suk Kim, Hye Soon Park, Ie Byung Park, Jong Suk Woo, Jeong Taek Son, Ho Young Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study |
title | Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study |
title_full | Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study |
title_short | Comparison of the Efficacy of Glimepiride, Metformin, and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Korean Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Practical Evidence of Antidiabetic Monotherapy Study |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacy of glimepiride, metformin, and rosiglitazone monotherapy in korean drug-naïve type 2 diabetic patients: the practical evidence of antidiabetic monotherapy study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21537410 http://dx.doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2011.35.1.26 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoonkunho comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT shinjeongah comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT kwonhyuksang comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT leeseunghwan comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT minkyungwan comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT ahnyubae comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT yoosoonjib comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT ahnkyujeung comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT parksungwoo comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT leekwanwoo comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT sungyeonah comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT parktaesun comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT kimminseon comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT kimyongki comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT nammoonsuk comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT kimhyesoon comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT parkiebyung comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT parkjongsuk comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT woojeongtaek comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy AT sonhoyoung comparisonoftheefficacyofglimepiridemetforminandrosiglitazonemonotherapyinkoreandrugnaivetype2diabeticpatientsthepracticalevidenceofantidiabeticmonotherapystudy |