Cargando…

Quantifying the Relative Contributions of Divisive and Subtractive Feedback to Rhythm Generation

Biological systems are characterized by a high number of interacting components. Determining the role of each component is difficult, addressed here in the context of biological oscillations. Rhythmic behavior can result from the interplay of positive feedback that promotes bistability between high...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tabak, Joël, Rinzel, John, Bertram, Richard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21533065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001124
_version_ 1782202150420480000
author Tabak, Joël
Rinzel, John
Bertram, Richard
author_facet Tabak, Joël
Rinzel, John
Bertram, Richard
author_sort Tabak, Joël
collection PubMed
description Biological systems are characterized by a high number of interacting components. Determining the role of each component is difficult, addressed here in the context of biological oscillations. Rhythmic behavior can result from the interplay of positive feedback that promotes bistability between high and low activity, and slow negative feedback that switches the system between the high and low activity states. Many biological oscillators include two types of negative feedback processes: divisive (decreases the gain of the positive feedback loop) and subtractive (increases the input threshold) that both contribute to slowly move the system between the high- and low-activity states. Can we determine the relative contribution of each type of negative feedback process to the rhythmic activity? Does one dominate? Do they control the active and silent phase equally? To answer these questions we use a neural network model with excitatory coupling, regulated by synaptic depression (divisive) and cellular adaptation (subtractive feedback). We first attempt to apply standard experimental methodologies: either passive observation to correlate the variations of a variable of interest to system behavior, or deletion of a component to establish whether a component is critical for the system. We find that these two strategies can lead to contradictory conclusions, and at best their interpretive power is limited. We instead develop a computational measure of the contribution of a process, by evaluating the sensitivity of the active (high activity) and silent (low activity) phase durations to the time constant of the process. The measure shows that both processes control the active phase, in proportion to their speed and relative weight. However, only the subtractive process plays a major role in setting the duration of the silent phase. This computational method can be used to analyze the role of negative feedback processes in a wide range of biological rhythms.
format Text
id pubmed-3080843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30808432011-04-29 Quantifying the Relative Contributions of Divisive and Subtractive Feedback to Rhythm Generation Tabak, Joël Rinzel, John Bertram, Richard PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Biological systems are characterized by a high number of interacting components. Determining the role of each component is difficult, addressed here in the context of biological oscillations. Rhythmic behavior can result from the interplay of positive feedback that promotes bistability between high and low activity, and slow negative feedback that switches the system between the high and low activity states. Many biological oscillators include two types of negative feedback processes: divisive (decreases the gain of the positive feedback loop) and subtractive (increases the input threshold) that both contribute to slowly move the system between the high- and low-activity states. Can we determine the relative contribution of each type of negative feedback process to the rhythmic activity? Does one dominate? Do they control the active and silent phase equally? To answer these questions we use a neural network model with excitatory coupling, regulated by synaptic depression (divisive) and cellular adaptation (subtractive feedback). We first attempt to apply standard experimental methodologies: either passive observation to correlate the variations of a variable of interest to system behavior, or deletion of a component to establish whether a component is critical for the system. We find that these two strategies can lead to contradictory conclusions, and at best their interpretive power is limited. We instead develop a computational measure of the contribution of a process, by evaluating the sensitivity of the active (high activity) and silent (low activity) phase durations to the time constant of the process. The measure shows that both processes control the active phase, in proportion to their speed and relative weight. However, only the subtractive process plays a major role in setting the duration of the silent phase. This computational method can be used to analyze the role of negative feedback processes in a wide range of biological rhythms. Public Library of Science 2011-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3080843/ /pubmed/21533065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001124 Text en Tabak et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tabak, Joël
Rinzel, John
Bertram, Richard
Quantifying the Relative Contributions of Divisive and Subtractive Feedback to Rhythm Generation
title Quantifying the Relative Contributions of Divisive and Subtractive Feedback to Rhythm Generation
title_full Quantifying the Relative Contributions of Divisive and Subtractive Feedback to Rhythm Generation
title_fullStr Quantifying the Relative Contributions of Divisive and Subtractive Feedback to Rhythm Generation
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the Relative Contributions of Divisive and Subtractive Feedback to Rhythm Generation
title_short Quantifying the Relative Contributions of Divisive and Subtractive Feedback to Rhythm Generation
title_sort quantifying the relative contributions of divisive and subtractive feedback to rhythm generation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21533065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001124
work_keys_str_mv AT tabakjoel quantifyingtherelativecontributionsofdivisiveandsubtractivefeedbacktorhythmgeneration
AT rinzeljohn quantifyingtherelativecontributionsofdivisiveandsubtractivefeedbacktorhythmgeneration
AT bertramrichard quantifyingtherelativecontributionsofdivisiveandsubtractivefeedbacktorhythmgeneration