Cargando…
Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis
We present an empirical comparison between two normalization mechanisms for citation-based indicators of research performance. These mechanisms aim to normalize citation counts for the field and the year in which a publication was published. One mechanism is applied in the current so-called crown in...
Autores principales: | Waltman, Ludo, van Eck, Nees Jan, van Leeuwen, Thed N., Visser, Martijn S., van Raan, Anthony F. J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21654898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0354-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review: reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff
por: Waltman, Ludo, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
A scientometric overview of CORD-19
por: Colavizza, Giovanni, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: an application to the field of library and information science
por: Waltman, Ludo, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Severe language effect in university rankings: particularly Germany and France are wronged in citation-based rankings
por: van Raan, Anthony F. J., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Citation Analysis May Severely Underestimate the Impact of Clinical Research as Compared to Basic Research
por: van Eck, Nees Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2013)