Cargando…

Deficits in Inhibitory Control in Smokers During a Go/NoGo Task: An Investigation Using Event-Related Brain Potentials

INTRODUCTION: The role of inhibitory control in addictive behaviors is highlighted in several models of addictive behaviors. Although reduced inhibitory control has been observed in addictive behaviors, it is inconclusive whether this is evident in smokers. Furthermore, it has been proposed that dru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luijten, Maartje, Littel, Marianne, Franken, Ingmar H. A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21526125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018898
_version_ 1782202197659877376
author Luijten, Maartje
Littel, Marianne
Franken, Ingmar H. A.
author_facet Luijten, Maartje
Littel, Marianne
Franken, Ingmar H. A.
author_sort Luijten, Maartje
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The role of inhibitory control in addictive behaviors is highlighted in several models of addictive behaviors. Although reduced inhibitory control has been observed in addictive behaviors, it is inconclusive whether this is evident in smokers. Furthermore, it has been proposed that drug abuse individuals with poor response inhibition may experience greater difficulties not consuming substances in the presence of drug cues. The major aim of the current study was to provide electrophysiological evidence for reduced inhibitory control in smokers and to investigate whether this is more pronounced during smoking cue exposure. METHODS: Participants (19 smokers and 20 non-smoking controls) performed a smoking Go/NoGo task. Behavioral accuracy and amplitudes of the N2 and P3 event-related potential (ERP), both reflecting aspects of response inhibition, were the main variables of interest. RESULTS: Reduced NoGo N2 amplitudes in smokers relative to controls were accompanied by decreased task performance, whereas no differences between groups were found in P3 amplitudes. This was found to represent a general lack of inhibition in smokers, and not dependent on the presence of smoking cues. CONCLUSIONS: The current results suggest that smokers have difficulties with response inhibition, which is an important finding that eventually can be implemented in smoking cessation programs. More research is needed to clarify the exact role of cue exposure on response inhibition.
format Text
id pubmed-3081309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30813092011-04-27 Deficits in Inhibitory Control in Smokers During a Go/NoGo Task: An Investigation Using Event-Related Brain Potentials Luijten, Maartje Littel, Marianne Franken, Ingmar H. A. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The role of inhibitory control in addictive behaviors is highlighted in several models of addictive behaviors. Although reduced inhibitory control has been observed in addictive behaviors, it is inconclusive whether this is evident in smokers. Furthermore, it has been proposed that drug abuse individuals with poor response inhibition may experience greater difficulties not consuming substances in the presence of drug cues. The major aim of the current study was to provide electrophysiological evidence for reduced inhibitory control in smokers and to investigate whether this is more pronounced during smoking cue exposure. METHODS: Participants (19 smokers and 20 non-smoking controls) performed a smoking Go/NoGo task. Behavioral accuracy and amplitudes of the N2 and P3 event-related potential (ERP), both reflecting aspects of response inhibition, were the main variables of interest. RESULTS: Reduced NoGo N2 amplitudes in smokers relative to controls were accompanied by decreased task performance, whereas no differences between groups were found in P3 amplitudes. This was found to represent a general lack of inhibition in smokers, and not dependent on the presence of smoking cues. CONCLUSIONS: The current results suggest that smokers have difficulties with response inhibition, which is an important finding that eventually can be implemented in smoking cessation programs. More research is needed to clarify the exact role of cue exposure on response inhibition. Public Library of Science 2011-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3081309/ /pubmed/21526125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018898 Text en Luijten et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Luijten, Maartje
Littel, Marianne
Franken, Ingmar H. A.
Deficits in Inhibitory Control in Smokers During a Go/NoGo Task: An Investigation Using Event-Related Brain Potentials
title Deficits in Inhibitory Control in Smokers During a Go/NoGo Task: An Investigation Using Event-Related Brain Potentials
title_full Deficits in Inhibitory Control in Smokers During a Go/NoGo Task: An Investigation Using Event-Related Brain Potentials
title_fullStr Deficits in Inhibitory Control in Smokers During a Go/NoGo Task: An Investigation Using Event-Related Brain Potentials
title_full_unstemmed Deficits in Inhibitory Control in Smokers During a Go/NoGo Task: An Investigation Using Event-Related Brain Potentials
title_short Deficits in Inhibitory Control in Smokers During a Go/NoGo Task: An Investigation Using Event-Related Brain Potentials
title_sort deficits in inhibitory control in smokers during a go/nogo task: an investigation using event-related brain potentials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21526125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018898
work_keys_str_mv AT luijtenmaartje deficitsininhibitorycontrolinsmokersduringagonogotaskaninvestigationusingeventrelatedbrainpotentials
AT littelmarianne deficitsininhibitorycontrolinsmokersduringagonogotaskaninvestigationusingeventrelatedbrainpotentials
AT frankeningmarha deficitsininhibitorycontrolinsmokersduringagonogotaskaninvestigationusingeventrelatedbrainpotentials