Cargando…

Adverse drug reaction profile of nanoparticle versus conventional formulation of paclitaxel: An observational study

OBJECTIVES: Conventional polyethoxylated castor oil (PCO)-based paclitaxel is associated with major adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Nanoxel, a nanoparticle-based formulation, may improve its tolerability by removing the need for PCO vehicle, and also permit its use in a higher dose. We conducted inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brahmachari, Ballari, Hazra, Avijit, Majumdar, Anup
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21572644
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.77341
_version_ 1782202212617814016
author Brahmachari, Ballari
Hazra, Avijit
Majumdar, Anup
author_facet Brahmachari, Ballari
Hazra, Avijit
Majumdar, Anup
author_sort Brahmachari, Ballari
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Conventional polyethoxylated castor oil (PCO)-based paclitaxel is associated with major adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Nanoxel, a nanoparticle-based formulation, may improve its tolerability by removing the need for PCO vehicle, and also permit its use in a higher dose. We conducted intensive monitoring of the ADR profile of Nanoxel in comparison with conventional paclitaxel in a public tertiary care set-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ADR data were collected from 10 patients receiving Nanoxel and 10 age-matched controls receiving conventional paclitaxel in this longitudinal observational study, conducted in a medical oncology ward over 18 months. Severity was graded as per US National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: The groups had comparable demography at baseline. The median disease duration and per cycle median dose of paclitaxel were greater in the Nanoxel arm. Total 119 ADRs were noted with Nanoxel and 123 with conventional paclitaxel. Of these, 25 (21.0%, 95% CI 13.69–28.33%) in the Nanoxel and 20 (16.2%, 95% CI 9.74–22.78%) in paclitaxel group were of grade 3/4 severity. Common events included myalgia, nausea, anemia, paresthesia, alopecia, diarrhea, and vomiting with Nanoxel, and paresthesia, anemia, myalgia, anorexia, alopecia, vomiting, diarrhea, stomatitis, and nausea with paclitaxel. Of the less common events (<5%), grade 2 or 3 arthralgia was seen exclusively with Nanoxel while motor neuropathy with muscular weakness was more frequent and severe with conventional paclitaxel. Hypersensitivity reactions were not encountered in either arm, although no antiallergy premedication was employed for Nanoxel. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its ADR profile being statistically comparable to conventional paclitaxel, this observational study suggests that Nanoxel tolerability could be better, considering that a significantly higher dose was employed. This hypothesis needs confirmation through an interventional study.
format Text
id pubmed-3081448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30814482011-05-13 Adverse drug reaction profile of nanoparticle versus conventional formulation of paclitaxel: An observational study Brahmachari, Ballari Hazra, Avijit Majumdar, Anup Indian J Pharmacol Research Article OBJECTIVES: Conventional polyethoxylated castor oil (PCO)-based paclitaxel is associated with major adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Nanoxel, a nanoparticle-based formulation, may improve its tolerability by removing the need for PCO vehicle, and also permit its use in a higher dose. We conducted intensive monitoring of the ADR profile of Nanoxel in comparison with conventional paclitaxel in a public tertiary care set-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ADR data were collected from 10 patients receiving Nanoxel and 10 age-matched controls receiving conventional paclitaxel in this longitudinal observational study, conducted in a medical oncology ward over 18 months. Severity was graded as per US National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: The groups had comparable demography at baseline. The median disease duration and per cycle median dose of paclitaxel were greater in the Nanoxel arm. Total 119 ADRs were noted with Nanoxel and 123 with conventional paclitaxel. Of these, 25 (21.0%, 95% CI 13.69–28.33%) in the Nanoxel and 20 (16.2%, 95% CI 9.74–22.78%) in paclitaxel group were of grade 3/4 severity. Common events included myalgia, nausea, anemia, paresthesia, alopecia, diarrhea, and vomiting with Nanoxel, and paresthesia, anemia, myalgia, anorexia, alopecia, vomiting, diarrhea, stomatitis, and nausea with paclitaxel. Of the less common events (<5%), grade 2 or 3 arthralgia was seen exclusively with Nanoxel while motor neuropathy with muscular weakness was more frequent and severe with conventional paclitaxel. Hypersensitivity reactions were not encountered in either arm, although no antiallergy premedication was employed for Nanoxel. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its ADR profile being statistically comparable to conventional paclitaxel, this observational study suggests that Nanoxel tolerability could be better, considering that a significantly higher dose was employed. This hypothesis needs confirmation through an interventional study. Medknow Publications 2011-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3081448/ /pubmed/21572644 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.77341 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brahmachari, Ballari
Hazra, Avijit
Majumdar, Anup
Adverse drug reaction profile of nanoparticle versus conventional formulation of paclitaxel: An observational study
title Adverse drug reaction profile of nanoparticle versus conventional formulation of paclitaxel: An observational study
title_full Adverse drug reaction profile of nanoparticle versus conventional formulation of paclitaxel: An observational study
title_fullStr Adverse drug reaction profile of nanoparticle versus conventional formulation of paclitaxel: An observational study
title_full_unstemmed Adverse drug reaction profile of nanoparticle versus conventional formulation of paclitaxel: An observational study
title_short Adverse drug reaction profile of nanoparticle versus conventional formulation of paclitaxel: An observational study
title_sort adverse drug reaction profile of nanoparticle versus conventional formulation of paclitaxel: an observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21572644
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.77341
work_keys_str_mv AT brahmachariballari adversedrugreactionprofileofnanoparticleversusconventionalformulationofpaclitaxelanobservationalstudy
AT hazraavijit adversedrugreactionprofileofnanoparticleversusconventionalformulationofpaclitaxelanobservationalstudy
AT majumdaranup adversedrugreactionprofileofnanoparticleversusconventionalformulationofpaclitaxelanobservationalstudy