Cargando…
A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study
BACKGROUND: To evaluate activity and tolerability of two anthracycline-containing regimens as first-line treatment for anthracycline-naïve relapsed breast cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with relapsed breast cancer not previously treated with adjuvant anthracyclines were randomly assigned to epir...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3082232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21481280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-30-39 |
_version_ | 1782202282083876864 |
---|---|
author | Vici, Patrizia Colucci, Giuseppe Giotta, Francesco Sergi, Domenico Filippelli, Gianfranco Perri, Pasquale Botti, Claudio Vizza, Enrico Carpino, Armando Pizzuti, Laura Latorre, Agnese Giannarelli, Diana Lopez, Massimo Di Lauro, Luigi |
author_facet | Vici, Patrizia Colucci, Giuseppe Giotta, Francesco Sergi, Domenico Filippelli, Gianfranco Perri, Pasquale Botti, Claudio Vizza, Enrico Carpino, Armando Pizzuti, Laura Latorre, Agnese Giannarelli, Diana Lopez, Massimo Di Lauro, Luigi |
author_sort | Vici, Patrizia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate activity and tolerability of two anthracycline-containing regimens as first-line treatment for anthracycline-naïve relapsed breast cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with relapsed breast cancer not previously treated with adjuvant anthracyclines were randomly assigned to epirubicin/vinorelbine (arm A: EPI/VNB, EPI 90 mg/m(2 )on day 1, VNB 25 mg/m(2 )on days 1,5 plus G-CSF subcutaneously on days 7-12, with cycles repeated every 21 days), or to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/VNB (arm B: PLD/VNB, PLD 40 mg/m(2 )on day 1, VNB 30 mg/m(2 )on days 1, 15, with cycles repeated every 4 weeks). Primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the two regimens in terms of response rate, secondarily toxicity, progression free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: One hundred and four patients have been enrolled (arm A 54, arm B 50): characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms. Responses were as follows: arm A, 3 (5.6%) CR, 20 (37%) PR, (ORR 42.6%, 95%CI 29.3%-55.9%); arm B, 8 (16%) CR, 18 (36%) PR, (ORR 52%, 95%CI 38.2%-65.8%). Median progression free survival was 10.7 months in arm A (95% CI, 8.7-12.6), and 8.8 months in arm B (95% CI, 7.1-10.5). Median overall survival was 34.6 months in arm A (95%CI, 19.5-49.8) and 24.8 months in arm B (95%CI, 15.7-33.9). As toxicity concerns, both treatment regimens were well tolerated; myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity, with G3-4 neutropenia occurring in 18.5% and 22% of the patients of arm A and B, respectively. No relevant differences in main toxic effects have been observed between the two arms, except for alopecia, more common in arm A, and cutaneous toxicity, observed only in arm B. No clinical congestive heart failures have been observed, one case of tachyarrhythmia was reported after the last EPI/VNB cycle, and two reversible ≥ 20% LVEF decreases have been observed in arm A. CONCLUSIONS: Both anthracycline- containing regimens evaluated in the present study seem to be active and with a satisfactory tolerability in anthracycline-naïve relapsed breast cancer patients. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3082232 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30822322011-04-27 A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study Vici, Patrizia Colucci, Giuseppe Giotta, Francesco Sergi, Domenico Filippelli, Gianfranco Perri, Pasquale Botti, Claudio Vizza, Enrico Carpino, Armando Pizzuti, Laura Latorre, Agnese Giannarelli, Diana Lopez, Massimo Di Lauro, Luigi J Exp Clin Cancer Res Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate activity and tolerability of two anthracycline-containing regimens as first-line treatment for anthracycline-naïve relapsed breast cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with relapsed breast cancer not previously treated with adjuvant anthracyclines were randomly assigned to epirubicin/vinorelbine (arm A: EPI/VNB, EPI 90 mg/m(2 )on day 1, VNB 25 mg/m(2 )on days 1,5 plus G-CSF subcutaneously on days 7-12, with cycles repeated every 21 days), or to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/VNB (arm B: PLD/VNB, PLD 40 mg/m(2 )on day 1, VNB 30 mg/m(2 )on days 1, 15, with cycles repeated every 4 weeks). Primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the two regimens in terms of response rate, secondarily toxicity, progression free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: One hundred and four patients have been enrolled (arm A 54, arm B 50): characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms. Responses were as follows: arm A, 3 (5.6%) CR, 20 (37%) PR, (ORR 42.6%, 95%CI 29.3%-55.9%); arm B, 8 (16%) CR, 18 (36%) PR, (ORR 52%, 95%CI 38.2%-65.8%). Median progression free survival was 10.7 months in arm A (95% CI, 8.7-12.6), and 8.8 months in arm B (95% CI, 7.1-10.5). Median overall survival was 34.6 months in arm A (95%CI, 19.5-49.8) and 24.8 months in arm B (95%CI, 15.7-33.9). As toxicity concerns, both treatment regimens were well tolerated; myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity, with G3-4 neutropenia occurring in 18.5% and 22% of the patients of arm A and B, respectively. No relevant differences in main toxic effects have been observed between the two arms, except for alopecia, more common in arm A, and cutaneous toxicity, observed only in arm B. No clinical congestive heart failures have been observed, one case of tachyarrhythmia was reported after the last EPI/VNB cycle, and two reversible ≥ 20% LVEF decreases have been observed in arm A. CONCLUSIONS: Both anthracycline- containing regimens evaluated in the present study seem to be active and with a satisfactory tolerability in anthracycline-naïve relapsed breast cancer patients. BioMed Central 2011-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3082232/ /pubmed/21481280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-30-39 Text en Copyright ©2011 Vici et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Vici, Patrizia Colucci, Giuseppe Giotta, Francesco Sergi, Domenico Filippelli, Gianfranco Perri, Pasquale Botti, Claudio Vizza, Enrico Carpino, Armando Pizzuti, Laura Latorre, Agnese Giannarelli, Diana Lopez, Massimo Di Lauro, Luigi A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study |
title | A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study |
title_full | A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study |
title_fullStr | A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study |
title_full_unstemmed | A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study |
title_short | A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study |
title_sort | multicenter prospective phase ii randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. a goim study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3082232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21481280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-30-39 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vicipatrizia amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT coluccigiuseppe amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT giottafrancesco amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT sergidomenico amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT filippelligianfranco amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT perripasquale amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT botticlaudio amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT vizzaenrico amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT carpinoarmando amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT pizzutilaura amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT latorreagnese amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT giannarellidiana amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT lopezmassimo amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT dilauroluigi amulticenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT vicipatrizia multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT coluccigiuseppe multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT giottafrancesco multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT sergidomenico multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT filippelligianfranco multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT perripasquale multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT botticlaudio multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT vizzaenrico multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT carpinoarmando multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT pizzutilaura multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT latorreagnese multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT giannarellidiana multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT lopezmassimo multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy AT dilauroluigi multicenterprospectivephaseiirandomizedtrialofepirubicinvinorelbineversuspegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinvinorelbineasfirstlinetreatmentinadvancedbreastcanceragoimstudy |