Cargando…

Advances of genomic science and systems biology in renal transplantation: a review

The diagnosis of rejection in kidney transplant patients is based on histologic classification of a graft biopsy. The current “gold standard” is the Banff 97 criteria; however, there are several limitations in classifying rejection based on biopsy samples. First, a biopsy involves an invasive proced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perkins, David, Verma, Meenakshi, Park, Ken J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3082700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21318414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00281-011-0243-2
_version_ 1782202315790352384
author Perkins, David
Verma, Meenakshi
Park, Ken J.
author_facet Perkins, David
Verma, Meenakshi
Park, Ken J.
author_sort Perkins, David
collection PubMed
description The diagnosis of rejection in kidney transplant patients is based on histologic classification of a graft biopsy. The current “gold standard” is the Banff 97 criteria; however, there are several limitations in classifying rejection based on biopsy samples. First, a biopsy involves an invasive procedure. Second, there is significant variance among blinded pathologists in the interpretation of a biopsy. And third, there is also variance between the histology and the molecular profiles of a biopsy. To increase the positive predictive value of classifiers of rejection, a Banff committee is developing criteria that integrate histologic and molecular data into a unified classifier that could diagnose and prognose rejection. To develop the most appropriate molecular criteria, there have been studies by multiple groups applying omics technologies in attempts to identify biomarkers of rejection. In this review, we discuss studies using genome-wide data sets of the transcriptome and proteome to investigate acute rejection, chronic allograft dysfunction, and tolerance. We also discuss studies which focus on genetic biomarkers in urine and peripheral blood, which will provide clinicians with minimally invasive methods for monitoring transplant patients. We also discuss emerging technologies, including whole-exome sequencing and RNA-Seq and new bioinformatic and systems biology approaches, which should increase the ability to develop both biomarkers and mechanistic understanding of the rejection process.
format Text
id pubmed-3082700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30827002011-06-06 Advances of genomic science and systems biology in renal transplantation: a review Perkins, David Verma, Meenakshi Park, Ken J. Semin Immunopathol Review The diagnosis of rejection in kidney transplant patients is based on histologic classification of a graft biopsy. The current “gold standard” is the Banff 97 criteria; however, there are several limitations in classifying rejection based on biopsy samples. First, a biopsy involves an invasive procedure. Second, there is significant variance among blinded pathologists in the interpretation of a biopsy. And third, there is also variance between the histology and the molecular profiles of a biopsy. To increase the positive predictive value of classifiers of rejection, a Banff committee is developing criteria that integrate histologic and molecular data into a unified classifier that could diagnose and prognose rejection. To develop the most appropriate molecular criteria, there have been studies by multiple groups applying omics technologies in attempts to identify biomarkers of rejection. In this review, we discuss studies using genome-wide data sets of the transcriptome and proteome to investigate acute rejection, chronic allograft dysfunction, and tolerance. We also discuss studies which focus on genetic biomarkers in urine and peripheral blood, which will provide clinicians with minimally invasive methods for monitoring transplant patients. We also discuss emerging technologies, including whole-exome sequencing and RNA-Seq and new bioinformatic and systems biology approaches, which should increase the ability to develop both biomarkers and mechanistic understanding of the rejection process. Springer-Verlag 2011-02-14 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3082700/ /pubmed/21318414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00281-011-0243-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Perkins, David
Verma, Meenakshi
Park, Ken J.
Advances of genomic science and systems biology in renal transplantation: a review
title Advances of genomic science and systems biology in renal transplantation: a review
title_full Advances of genomic science and systems biology in renal transplantation: a review
title_fullStr Advances of genomic science and systems biology in renal transplantation: a review
title_full_unstemmed Advances of genomic science and systems biology in renal transplantation: a review
title_short Advances of genomic science and systems biology in renal transplantation: a review
title_sort advances of genomic science and systems biology in renal transplantation: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3082700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21318414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00281-011-0243-2
work_keys_str_mv AT perkinsdavid advancesofgenomicscienceandsystemsbiologyinrenaltransplantationareview
AT vermameenakshi advancesofgenomicscienceandsystemsbiologyinrenaltransplantationareview
AT parkkenj advancesofgenomicscienceandsystemsbiologyinrenaltransplantationareview