Cargando…

The assessment value of transcranial Doppler sonography versus magnetic resonance angiography in vertebrobasilar stroke

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine the reliability of TCD in evaluation of vertebrobasilar arteries in comparison with brain MRA in patients suffering from acute vertebrobasilar stroke. METHODS: Samples were patients with definite clinical diagnosis of vertebrobasilar stroke. For al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghorbani, Abbas, Ashtari, Fereshteh, Fatehi, Farzad
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3082802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21526072
_version_ 1782202329935642624
author Ghorbani, Abbas
Ashtari, Fereshteh
Fatehi, Farzad
author_facet Ghorbani, Abbas
Ashtari, Fereshteh
Fatehi, Farzad
author_sort Ghorbani, Abbas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine the reliability of TCD in evaluation of vertebrobasilar arteries in comparison with brain MRA in patients suffering from acute vertebrobasilar stroke. METHODS: Samples were patients with definite clinical diagnosis of vertebrobasilar stroke. For all patients brain MRI, MRA and TCD were performed during the first 48 hours of admission. Basilar artery was insonated at the depth of 75 to 85 mm and vertebral arteries were insonated at the depth of 45 to 55 mm. On brain MRA, the degree of stenosis in vertebrobasilar arteries was graded from I (normal) to IV (total stenosis) and the correlation between the grade of stenosis and TCD indices were studied. RESULTS: Spearman correlation test revealed a significant correlation between mean flow velocity (MFV) and MRA grading (correlation coefficient = -0.486) as well as end diastolic velocity (EDV) and MRA grading (correlation coefficient = -0.323) with no significant correlation between pulsatility index, peak systolic velocity and MRA grading (p > 0.05). One way ANOVA analysis showed that there was only significant mean MFV and mean EDV difference between grade 1 and other grades. CONCLUSIONS: TCD was only able to differentiate between stenotic and normal pattern and could not assist in the grading of stenosis. On the other hand, in acute vertebrobasilar stroke that TCD performed blindly without visualization of arteries and in a fixed depth it might have limited value in the grading of vertebrobasilar system stenosis.
format Text
id pubmed-3082802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30828022011-04-27 The assessment value of transcranial Doppler sonography versus magnetic resonance angiography in vertebrobasilar stroke Ghorbani, Abbas Ashtari, Fereshteh Fatehi, Farzad J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine the reliability of TCD in evaluation of vertebrobasilar arteries in comparison with brain MRA in patients suffering from acute vertebrobasilar stroke. METHODS: Samples were patients with definite clinical diagnosis of vertebrobasilar stroke. For all patients brain MRI, MRA and TCD were performed during the first 48 hours of admission. Basilar artery was insonated at the depth of 75 to 85 mm and vertebral arteries were insonated at the depth of 45 to 55 mm. On brain MRA, the degree of stenosis in vertebrobasilar arteries was graded from I (normal) to IV (total stenosis) and the correlation between the grade of stenosis and TCD indices were studied. RESULTS: Spearman correlation test revealed a significant correlation between mean flow velocity (MFV) and MRA grading (correlation coefficient = -0.486) as well as end diastolic velocity (EDV) and MRA grading (correlation coefficient = -0.323) with no significant correlation between pulsatility index, peak systolic velocity and MRA grading (p > 0.05). One way ANOVA analysis showed that there was only significant mean MFV and mean EDV difference between grade 1 and other grades. CONCLUSIONS: TCD was only able to differentiate between stenotic and normal pattern and could not assist in the grading of stenosis. On the other hand, in acute vertebrobasilar stroke that TCD performed blindly without visualization of arteries and in a fixed depth it might have limited value in the grading of vertebrobasilar system stenosis. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3082802/ /pubmed/21526072 Text en © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghorbani, Abbas
Ashtari, Fereshteh
Fatehi, Farzad
The assessment value of transcranial Doppler sonography versus magnetic resonance angiography in vertebrobasilar stroke
title The assessment value of transcranial Doppler sonography versus magnetic resonance angiography in vertebrobasilar stroke
title_full The assessment value of transcranial Doppler sonography versus magnetic resonance angiography in vertebrobasilar stroke
title_fullStr The assessment value of transcranial Doppler sonography versus magnetic resonance angiography in vertebrobasilar stroke
title_full_unstemmed The assessment value of transcranial Doppler sonography versus magnetic resonance angiography in vertebrobasilar stroke
title_short The assessment value of transcranial Doppler sonography versus magnetic resonance angiography in vertebrobasilar stroke
title_sort assessment value of transcranial doppler sonography versus magnetic resonance angiography in vertebrobasilar stroke
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3082802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21526072
work_keys_str_mv AT ghorbaniabbas theassessmentvalueoftranscranialdopplersonographyversusmagneticresonanceangiographyinvertebrobasilarstroke
AT ashtarifereshteh theassessmentvalueoftranscranialdopplersonographyversusmagneticresonanceangiographyinvertebrobasilarstroke
AT fatehifarzad theassessmentvalueoftranscranialdopplersonographyversusmagneticresonanceangiographyinvertebrobasilarstroke
AT ghorbaniabbas assessmentvalueoftranscranialdopplersonographyversusmagneticresonanceangiographyinvertebrobasilarstroke
AT ashtarifereshteh assessmentvalueoftranscranialdopplersonographyversusmagneticresonanceangiographyinvertebrobasilarstroke
AT fatehifarzad assessmentvalueoftranscranialdopplersonographyversusmagneticresonanceangiographyinvertebrobasilarstroke