Cargando…
Posterior Reconstruction Before Anastomosis Improves the Anastomosis Time During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to evaluate posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and determine whether this technique decreased anastomotic time of a surgeon in training to perform vesicourethral reconstruction. METHODS: We reviewed the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3083042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21605515 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12924466008204 |
_version_ | 1782202366730174464 |
---|---|
author | Bernie, Aaron M. Caire, Arthur A. Conley, Sarah P. Oommen, Mathew Boylu, Ugur Thomas, Raju Lee, Benjamin R. |
author_facet | Bernie, Aaron M. Caire, Arthur A. Conley, Sarah P. Oommen, Mathew Boylu, Ugur Thomas, Raju Lee, Benjamin R. |
author_sort | Bernie, Aaron M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to evaluate posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and determine whether this technique decreased anastomotic time of a surgeon in training to perform vesicourethral reconstruction. METHODS: We reviewed the first 25 robot-assisted prostatectomies performed by 2 urology surgeons in training (surgeon 1 and surgeon 2). The patient populations were matched for age, Gleason score, clinical stage, and PSA. Whereas surgeon 1 performed the vesicourethral anastomosis without posterior reconstruction, surgeon 2 reapproximated Denonvilliers' fascia of the posterior bladder to the rhabdosphincter. Time for each surgeon to complete the anastomosis and clinical factors was compared. RESULTS: Surgeon 1 had a median anastomosis time of 25 minutes (range, 17 to 48), whereas surgeon 2 had a median anastomosis time of 15 minutes (range, 10 to 30) (P<0.001). Biopsy Gleason score, pathological tumor stage, perineural invasion, median age at the time of surgery, PSA, prostate weight, and estimated blood loss were not significantly different between surgeons (P>0.05). Pathological Gleason score (P=0.045) and total console time (surgeon 1=216 minutes, surgeon 2=176 minutes; P=0.002) were significantly different between surgeons. CONCLUSION: Posterior reconstruction prior to anastomosis decreases anastomosis time for robotic surgeons in training. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3083042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30830422011-08-29 Posterior Reconstruction Before Anastomosis Improves the Anastomosis Time During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Bernie, Aaron M. Caire, Arthur A. Conley, Sarah P. Oommen, Mathew Boylu, Ugur Thomas, Raju Lee, Benjamin R. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to evaluate posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and determine whether this technique decreased anastomotic time of a surgeon in training to perform vesicourethral reconstruction. METHODS: We reviewed the first 25 robot-assisted prostatectomies performed by 2 urology surgeons in training (surgeon 1 and surgeon 2). The patient populations were matched for age, Gleason score, clinical stage, and PSA. Whereas surgeon 1 performed the vesicourethral anastomosis without posterior reconstruction, surgeon 2 reapproximated Denonvilliers' fascia of the posterior bladder to the rhabdosphincter. Time for each surgeon to complete the anastomosis and clinical factors was compared. RESULTS: Surgeon 1 had a median anastomosis time of 25 minutes (range, 17 to 48), whereas surgeon 2 had a median anastomosis time of 15 minutes (range, 10 to 30) (P<0.001). Biopsy Gleason score, pathological tumor stage, perineural invasion, median age at the time of surgery, PSA, prostate weight, and estimated blood loss were not significantly different between surgeons (P>0.05). Pathological Gleason score (P=0.045) and total console time (surgeon 1=216 minutes, surgeon 2=176 minutes; P=0.002) were significantly different between surgeons. CONCLUSION: Posterior reconstruction prior to anastomosis decreases anastomosis time for robotic surgeons in training. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3083042/ /pubmed/21605515 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12924466008204 Text en © 2010 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Bernie, Aaron M. Caire, Arthur A. Conley, Sarah P. Oommen, Mathew Boylu, Ugur Thomas, Raju Lee, Benjamin R. Posterior Reconstruction Before Anastomosis Improves the Anastomosis Time During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy |
title | Posterior Reconstruction Before Anastomosis Improves the Anastomosis Time During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy |
title_full | Posterior Reconstruction Before Anastomosis Improves the Anastomosis Time During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy |
title_fullStr | Posterior Reconstruction Before Anastomosis Improves the Anastomosis Time During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Posterior Reconstruction Before Anastomosis Improves the Anastomosis Time During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy |
title_short | Posterior Reconstruction Before Anastomosis Improves the Anastomosis Time During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy |
title_sort | posterior reconstruction before anastomosis improves the anastomosis time during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3083042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21605515 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12924466008204 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernieaaronm posteriorreconstructionbeforeanastomosisimprovestheanastomosistimeduringrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy AT cairearthura posteriorreconstructionbeforeanastomosisimprovestheanastomosistimeduringrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy AT conleysarahp posteriorreconstructionbeforeanastomosisimprovestheanastomosistimeduringrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy AT oommenmathew posteriorreconstructionbeforeanastomosisimprovestheanastomosistimeduringrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy AT boyluugur posteriorreconstructionbeforeanastomosisimprovestheanastomosistimeduringrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy AT thomasraju posteriorreconstructionbeforeanastomosisimprovestheanastomosistimeduringrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy AT leebenjaminr posteriorreconstructionbeforeanastomosisimprovestheanastomosistimeduringrobotassistedradicalprostatectomy |