Cargando…

An evaluation of the effectiveness of a community mentoring service for socially isolated older people: a controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Social isolation affects a significant proportion of older people and is associated with poor health outcomes. The current evidence base regarding the effectiveness of interventions targeting social isolation is poor, and the potential utility of mentoring for this purpose has not previo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickens, Andy P, Richards, Suzanne H, Hawton, Annie, Taylor, Rod S, Greaves, Colin J, Green, Colin, Edwards, Rachel, Campbell, John L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3083357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21477273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-218
_version_ 1782202383776874496
author Dickens, Andy P
Richards, Suzanne H
Hawton, Annie
Taylor, Rod S
Greaves, Colin J
Green, Colin
Edwards, Rachel
Campbell, John L
author_facet Dickens, Andy P
Richards, Suzanne H
Hawton, Annie
Taylor, Rod S
Greaves, Colin J
Green, Colin
Edwards, Rachel
Campbell, John L
author_sort Dickens, Andy P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Social isolation affects a significant proportion of older people and is associated with poor health outcomes. The current evidence base regarding the effectiveness of interventions targeting social isolation is poor, and the potential utility of mentoring for this purpose has not previously been rigorously evaluated. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a community-based mentoring service for improving mental health, social engagement and physical health for socially isolated older people. METHODS: This prospective controlled trial compared a sample of mentoring service clients (intervention group) with a matched control group recruited through general practice. One hundred and ninety five participants from each group were matched on mental wellbeing and social activity scores. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at six month follow-up. The primary outcome was the Short Form Health Survey v2 (SF-12) mental health component score (MCS). Secondary outcomes included the SF-12 physical health component score (PCS), EuroQol EQ-5D, Geriatric Depression Score (GDS-10), social activity, social support and morbidities. RESULTS: We found no evidence that mentoring was beneficial across a wide range of participant outcomes measuring health status, social activity and depression. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed at follow-up in the primary outcome (p = 0.48) and in most secondary outcomes. Identifying suitable matched pairs of intervention and control group participants proved challenging. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial provide no substantial evidence supporting the use of community mentoring as an effective means of alleviating social isolation in older people. Further evidence is needed on the effectiveness of community-based interventions targeting social isolation. When using non-randomised designs, there are considerable challenges in the recruitment of suitable matches from a community sample. TRIAL REGISTRATION: SCIE Research Register for Social Care 105923
format Text
id pubmed-3083357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30833572011-04-28 An evaluation of the effectiveness of a community mentoring service for socially isolated older people: a controlled trial Dickens, Andy P Richards, Suzanne H Hawton, Annie Taylor, Rod S Greaves, Colin J Green, Colin Edwards, Rachel Campbell, John L BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Social isolation affects a significant proportion of older people and is associated with poor health outcomes. The current evidence base regarding the effectiveness of interventions targeting social isolation is poor, and the potential utility of mentoring for this purpose has not previously been rigorously evaluated. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a community-based mentoring service for improving mental health, social engagement and physical health for socially isolated older people. METHODS: This prospective controlled trial compared a sample of mentoring service clients (intervention group) with a matched control group recruited through general practice. One hundred and ninety five participants from each group were matched on mental wellbeing and social activity scores. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at six month follow-up. The primary outcome was the Short Form Health Survey v2 (SF-12) mental health component score (MCS). Secondary outcomes included the SF-12 physical health component score (PCS), EuroQol EQ-5D, Geriatric Depression Score (GDS-10), social activity, social support and morbidities. RESULTS: We found no evidence that mentoring was beneficial across a wide range of participant outcomes measuring health status, social activity and depression. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed at follow-up in the primary outcome (p = 0.48) and in most secondary outcomes. Identifying suitable matched pairs of intervention and control group participants proved challenging. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial provide no substantial evidence supporting the use of community mentoring as an effective means of alleviating social isolation in older people. Further evidence is needed on the effectiveness of community-based interventions targeting social isolation. When using non-randomised designs, there are considerable challenges in the recruitment of suitable matches from a community sample. TRIAL REGISTRATION: SCIE Research Register for Social Care 105923 BioMed Central 2011-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3083357/ /pubmed/21477273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-218 Text en Copyright ©2011 Dickens et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dickens, Andy P
Richards, Suzanne H
Hawton, Annie
Taylor, Rod S
Greaves, Colin J
Green, Colin
Edwards, Rachel
Campbell, John L
An evaluation of the effectiveness of a community mentoring service for socially isolated older people: a controlled trial
title An evaluation of the effectiveness of a community mentoring service for socially isolated older people: a controlled trial
title_full An evaluation of the effectiveness of a community mentoring service for socially isolated older people: a controlled trial
title_fullStr An evaluation of the effectiveness of a community mentoring service for socially isolated older people: a controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the effectiveness of a community mentoring service for socially isolated older people: a controlled trial
title_short An evaluation of the effectiveness of a community mentoring service for socially isolated older people: a controlled trial
title_sort evaluation of the effectiveness of a community mentoring service for socially isolated older people: a controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3083357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21477273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-218
work_keys_str_mv AT dickensandyp anevaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT richardssuzanneh anevaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT hawtonannie anevaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT taylorrods anevaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT greavescolinj anevaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT greencolin anevaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT edwardsrachel anevaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT campbelljohnl anevaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT dickensandyp evaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT richardssuzanneh evaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT hawtonannie evaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT taylorrods evaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT greavescolinj evaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT greencolin evaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT edwardsrachel evaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial
AT campbelljohnl evaluationoftheeffectivenessofacommunitymentoringserviceforsociallyisolatedolderpeopleacontrolledtrial