Cargando…

Diagnosis of Hepatozoon canis in young dogs by cytology and PCR

BACKGROUND: Hepatozoon canis is a widespread tick-borne protozoan affecting dogs. The diagnosis of H. canis infection is usually performed by cytology of blood or buffy coat smears, but this method may not be sensitive. Our study aimed to evaluate the best method to achieve a parasitological diagnos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otranto, Domenico, Dantas-Torres, Filipe, Weigl, Stefania, Latrofa, Maria Stefania, Stanneck, Dorothee, Decaprariis, Donato, Capelli, Gioia, Baneth, Gad
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3083373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21489247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-55
_version_ 1782202387553845248
author Otranto, Domenico
Dantas-Torres, Filipe
Weigl, Stefania
Latrofa, Maria Stefania
Stanneck, Dorothee
Decaprariis, Donato
Capelli, Gioia
Baneth, Gad
author_facet Otranto, Domenico
Dantas-Torres, Filipe
Weigl, Stefania
Latrofa, Maria Stefania
Stanneck, Dorothee
Decaprariis, Donato
Capelli, Gioia
Baneth, Gad
author_sort Otranto, Domenico
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatozoon canis is a widespread tick-borne protozoan affecting dogs. The diagnosis of H. canis infection is usually performed by cytology of blood or buffy coat smears, but this method may not be sensitive. Our study aimed to evaluate the best method to achieve a parasitological diagnosis of H. canis infection in a population of receptive young dogs, previously negative by cytology and exposed to tick infestation for one summer season. RESULTS: A total of 73 mongrel dogs and ten beagles younger than 18 months of age, living in an animal shelter in southern Italy where dogs are highly infested by Rhipicephalus sanguineus, were included in this study. In March-April 2009 and in October 2009, blood and bone marrow were sampled from each dog. Blood, buffy coat and bone marrow were examined by cytology only (at the first sampling) and also by PCR for H. canis (second sampling). In March-April 2009, only one dog was positive for H. canis by cytological examination, whereas in October 2009 (after the summer season), the overall incidence of H. canis infection by cytological examinations was 43.9%. Molecular tests carried out on samples taken in October 2009 showed a considerably higher number of dogs positive by PCR (from 27.7% up to 51.2% on skin and buffy coat tissues, respectively), with an overall positivity of 57.8%. All animals, but one, which were positive by cytology were also PCR-positive. PCR on blood or buffy coat detected the highest number of H. canis-positive dogs displaying a sensitivity of 85.7% for both tissues that increased up to 98% when used in parallel. Twenty-six (74.8%) out of the 28 H. canis-positive dogs presented hematological abnormalities, eosinophilia being the commonest alteration observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that PCR on buffy coat and blood is the best diagnostic assay for detecting H. canis infection in dogs, although when PCR is not available, cytology on buffy coat should be preferred to blood smear evaluation. This study has also demonstrated that H. canis infection can spread among young dogs infested by R. sanguineus and be present in the majority of the exposed population within 6 months.
format Text
id pubmed-3083373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30833732011-04-28 Diagnosis of Hepatozoon canis in young dogs by cytology and PCR Otranto, Domenico Dantas-Torres, Filipe Weigl, Stefania Latrofa, Maria Stefania Stanneck, Dorothee Decaprariis, Donato Capelli, Gioia Baneth, Gad Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Hepatozoon canis is a widespread tick-borne protozoan affecting dogs. The diagnosis of H. canis infection is usually performed by cytology of blood or buffy coat smears, but this method may not be sensitive. Our study aimed to evaluate the best method to achieve a parasitological diagnosis of H. canis infection in a population of receptive young dogs, previously negative by cytology and exposed to tick infestation for one summer season. RESULTS: A total of 73 mongrel dogs and ten beagles younger than 18 months of age, living in an animal shelter in southern Italy where dogs are highly infested by Rhipicephalus sanguineus, were included in this study. In March-April 2009 and in October 2009, blood and bone marrow were sampled from each dog. Blood, buffy coat and bone marrow were examined by cytology only (at the first sampling) and also by PCR for H. canis (second sampling). In March-April 2009, only one dog was positive for H. canis by cytological examination, whereas in October 2009 (after the summer season), the overall incidence of H. canis infection by cytological examinations was 43.9%. Molecular tests carried out on samples taken in October 2009 showed a considerably higher number of dogs positive by PCR (from 27.7% up to 51.2% on skin and buffy coat tissues, respectively), with an overall positivity of 57.8%. All animals, but one, which were positive by cytology were also PCR-positive. PCR on blood or buffy coat detected the highest number of H. canis-positive dogs displaying a sensitivity of 85.7% for both tissues that increased up to 98% when used in parallel. Twenty-six (74.8%) out of the 28 H. canis-positive dogs presented hematological abnormalities, eosinophilia being the commonest alteration observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that PCR on buffy coat and blood is the best diagnostic assay for detecting H. canis infection in dogs, although when PCR is not available, cytology on buffy coat should be preferred to blood smear evaluation. This study has also demonstrated that H. canis infection can spread among young dogs infested by R. sanguineus and be present in the majority of the exposed population within 6 months. BioMed Central 2011-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3083373/ /pubmed/21489247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-55 Text en Copyright ©2011 Otranto et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Otranto, Domenico
Dantas-Torres, Filipe
Weigl, Stefania
Latrofa, Maria Stefania
Stanneck, Dorothee
Decaprariis, Donato
Capelli, Gioia
Baneth, Gad
Diagnosis of Hepatozoon canis in young dogs by cytology and PCR
title Diagnosis of Hepatozoon canis in young dogs by cytology and PCR
title_full Diagnosis of Hepatozoon canis in young dogs by cytology and PCR
title_fullStr Diagnosis of Hepatozoon canis in young dogs by cytology and PCR
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis of Hepatozoon canis in young dogs by cytology and PCR
title_short Diagnosis of Hepatozoon canis in young dogs by cytology and PCR
title_sort diagnosis of hepatozoon canis in young dogs by cytology and pcr
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3083373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21489247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-55
work_keys_str_mv AT otrantodomenico diagnosisofhepatozooncanisinyoungdogsbycytologyandpcr
AT dantastorresfilipe diagnosisofhepatozooncanisinyoungdogsbycytologyandpcr
AT weiglstefania diagnosisofhepatozooncanisinyoungdogsbycytologyandpcr
AT latrofamariastefania diagnosisofhepatozooncanisinyoungdogsbycytologyandpcr
AT stanneckdorothee diagnosisofhepatozooncanisinyoungdogsbycytologyandpcr
AT decaprariisdonato diagnosisofhepatozooncanisinyoungdogsbycytologyandpcr
AT capelligioia diagnosisofhepatozooncanisinyoungdogsbycytologyandpcr
AT banethgad diagnosisofhepatozooncanisinyoungdogsbycytologyandpcr