Cargando…

Health Systems and Sustainability: Doctors and Consumers Differ on Threats and Solutions

BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems face the problem of insufficient resources to meet the needs of ageing populations and increasing demands for access to new treatments. It is unclear whether doctors and consumers agree on the main challenges to health system sustainability. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robertson, Jane, Walkom, Emily J., Henry, David A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3083414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21556357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019222
_version_ 1782202397294067712
author Robertson, Jane
Walkom, Emily J.
Henry, David A.
author_facet Robertson, Jane
Walkom, Emily J.
Henry, David A.
author_sort Robertson, Jane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems face the problem of insufficient resources to meet the needs of ageing populations and increasing demands for access to new treatments. It is unclear whether doctors and consumers agree on the main challenges to health system sustainability. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a mail survey of Australian doctors (specialists and general practitioners) and a computer assisted telephone interview (CATI) of consumers to determine their views on contributors to increasing health care costs, rationing of services and involvement in health resource allocation decisions. Differences in responses are reported as odds ratios (OR) and 99% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Of 2948 doctors, 1139 (38.6%) responded; 533 of 826 consumers responded (64.5% response). Doctors were more concerned than consumers with the effects of an ageing population (OR 3.0; 99% CI 1.7, 5.4), and costs of new drugs and technologies (OR 5.1; CI 3.3, 8.0), but less likely to consider pharmaceutical promotional activities as a cost driver (OR 0.29, CI 0.22, 0.39). Doctors were more likely than consumers to view ‘community demand’ for new technologies as a major cost driver, (OR 1.6; 1.2, 2.2), but less likely to attribute increased costs to patients failing to take responsibility for their own health (OR 0.35; 0.24, 0.49). Like doctors, the majority of consumers saw a need for public consultation in decisions about funding for new treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Australian doctors and consumers hold different views on the sustainability of the healthcare system, and a number of key issues relating to costs, cost drivers, roles and responsibilities. Doctors recognise their dual responsibility to patients and society, see an important role for physicians in influencing resource allocation, and acknowledge their lack of skills in assessing treatments of marginal value. Consumers recognise cost pressures on the health system, but express willingness to be involved in health care decision making.
format Text
id pubmed-3083414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30834142011-05-09 Health Systems and Sustainability: Doctors and Consumers Differ on Threats and Solutions Robertson, Jane Walkom, Emily J. Henry, David A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems face the problem of insufficient resources to meet the needs of ageing populations and increasing demands for access to new treatments. It is unclear whether doctors and consumers agree on the main challenges to health system sustainability. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a mail survey of Australian doctors (specialists and general practitioners) and a computer assisted telephone interview (CATI) of consumers to determine their views on contributors to increasing health care costs, rationing of services and involvement in health resource allocation decisions. Differences in responses are reported as odds ratios (OR) and 99% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Of 2948 doctors, 1139 (38.6%) responded; 533 of 826 consumers responded (64.5% response). Doctors were more concerned than consumers with the effects of an ageing population (OR 3.0; 99% CI 1.7, 5.4), and costs of new drugs and technologies (OR 5.1; CI 3.3, 8.0), but less likely to consider pharmaceutical promotional activities as a cost driver (OR 0.29, CI 0.22, 0.39). Doctors were more likely than consumers to view ‘community demand’ for new technologies as a major cost driver, (OR 1.6; 1.2, 2.2), but less likely to attribute increased costs to patients failing to take responsibility for their own health (OR 0.35; 0.24, 0.49). Like doctors, the majority of consumers saw a need for public consultation in decisions about funding for new treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Australian doctors and consumers hold different views on the sustainability of the healthcare system, and a number of key issues relating to costs, cost drivers, roles and responsibilities. Doctors recognise their dual responsibility to patients and society, see an important role for physicians in influencing resource allocation, and acknowledge their lack of skills in assessing treatments of marginal value. Consumers recognise cost pressures on the health system, but express willingness to be involved in health care decision making. Public Library of Science 2011-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3083414/ /pubmed/21556357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019222 Text en Robertson et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Robertson, Jane
Walkom, Emily J.
Henry, David A.
Health Systems and Sustainability: Doctors and Consumers Differ on Threats and Solutions
title Health Systems and Sustainability: Doctors and Consumers Differ on Threats and Solutions
title_full Health Systems and Sustainability: Doctors and Consumers Differ on Threats and Solutions
title_fullStr Health Systems and Sustainability: Doctors and Consumers Differ on Threats and Solutions
title_full_unstemmed Health Systems and Sustainability: Doctors and Consumers Differ on Threats and Solutions
title_short Health Systems and Sustainability: Doctors and Consumers Differ on Threats and Solutions
title_sort health systems and sustainability: doctors and consumers differ on threats and solutions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3083414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21556357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019222
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsonjane healthsystemsandsustainabilitydoctorsandconsumersdifferonthreatsandsolutions
AT walkomemilyj healthsystemsandsustainabilitydoctorsandconsumersdifferonthreatsandsolutions
AT henrydavida healthsystemsandsustainabilitydoctorsandconsumersdifferonthreatsandsolutions