Cargando…

Does Positive Selection Drive Transcription Factor Binding Site Turnover? A Test with Drosophila Cis-Regulatory Modules

Transcription factor binding site(s) (TFBS) gain and loss (i.e., turnover) is a well-documented feature of cis-regulatory module (CRM) evolution, yet little attention has been paid to the evolutionary force(s) driving this turnover process. The predominant view, motivated by its widespread occurrenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Bin Z., Holloway, Alisha K., Maerkl, Sebastian J., Kreitman, Martin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3084208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21572512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002053
_version_ 1782202469386813440
author He, Bin Z.
Holloway, Alisha K.
Maerkl, Sebastian J.
Kreitman, Martin
author_facet He, Bin Z.
Holloway, Alisha K.
Maerkl, Sebastian J.
Kreitman, Martin
author_sort He, Bin Z.
collection PubMed
description Transcription factor binding site(s) (TFBS) gain and loss (i.e., turnover) is a well-documented feature of cis-regulatory module (CRM) evolution, yet little attention has been paid to the evolutionary force(s) driving this turnover process. The predominant view, motivated by its widespread occurrence, emphasizes the importance of compensatory mutation and genetic drift. Positive selection, in contrast, although it has been invoked in specific instances of adaptive gene expression evolution, has not been considered as a general alternative to neutral compensatory evolution. In this study we evaluate the two hypotheses by analyzing patterns of single nucleotide polymorphism in the TFBS of well-characterized CRM in two closely related Drosophila species, Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. An important feature of the analysis is classification of TFBS mutations according to the direction of their predicted effect on binding affinity, which allows gains and losses to be evaluated independently along the two phylogenetic lineages. The observed patterns of polymorphism and divergence are not compatible with neutral evolution for either class of mutations. Instead, multiple lines of evidence are consistent with contributions of positive selection to TFBS gain and loss as well as purifying selection in its maintenance. In discussion, we propose a model to reconcile the finding of selection driving TFBS turnover with constrained CRM function over long evolutionary time.
format Text
id pubmed-3084208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30842082011-05-13 Does Positive Selection Drive Transcription Factor Binding Site Turnover? A Test with Drosophila Cis-Regulatory Modules He, Bin Z. Holloway, Alisha K. Maerkl, Sebastian J. Kreitman, Martin PLoS Genet Research Article Transcription factor binding site(s) (TFBS) gain and loss (i.e., turnover) is a well-documented feature of cis-regulatory module (CRM) evolution, yet little attention has been paid to the evolutionary force(s) driving this turnover process. The predominant view, motivated by its widespread occurrence, emphasizes the importance of compensatory mutation and genetic drift. Positive selection, in contrast, although it has been invoked in specific instances of adaptive gene expression evolution, has not been considered as a general alternative to neutral compensatory evolution. In this study we evaluate the two hypotheses by analyzing patterns of single nucleotide polymorphism in the TFBS of well-characterized CRM in two closely related Drosophila species, Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. An important feature of the analysis is classification of TFBS mutations according to the direction of their predicted effect on binding affinity, which allows gains and losses to be evaluated independently along the two phylogenetic lineages. The observed patterns of polymorphism and divergence are not compatible with neutral evolution for either class of mutations. Instead, multiple lines of evidence are consistent with contributions of positive selection to TFBS gain and loss as well as purifying selection in its maintenance. In discussion, we propose a model to reconcile the finding of selection driving TFBS turnover with constrained CRM function over long evolutionary time. Public Library of Science 2011-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3084208/ /pubmed/21572512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002053 Text en He et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
He, Bin Z.
Holloway, Alisha K.
Maerkl, Sebastian J.
Kreitman, Martin
Does Positive Selection Drive Transcription Factor Binding Site Turnover? A Test with Drosophila Cis-Regulatory Modules
title Does Positive Selection Drive Transcription Factor Binding Site Turnover? A Test with Drosophila Cis-Regulatory Modules
title_full Does Positive Selection Drive Transcription Factor Binding Site Turnover? A Test with Drosophila Cis-Regulatory Modules
title_fullStr Does Positive Selection Drive Transcription Factor Binding Site Turnover? A Test with Drosophila Cis-Regulatory Modules
title_full_unstemmed Does Positive Selection Drive Transcription Factor Binding Site Turnover? A Test with Drosophila Cis-Regulatory Modules
title_short Does Positive Selection Drive Transcription Factor Binding Site Turnover? A Test with Drosophila Cis-Regulatory Modules
title_sort does positive selection drive transcription factor binding site turnover? a test with drosophila cis-regulatory modules
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3084208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21572512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002053
work_keys_str_mv AT hebinz doespositiveselectiondrivetranscriptionfactorbindingsiteturnoveratestwithdrosophilacisregulatorymodules
AT hollowayalishak doespositiveselectiondrivetranscriptionfactorbindingsiteturnoveratestwithdrosophilacisregulatorymodules
AT maerklsebastianj doespositiveselectiondrivetranscriptionfactorbindingsiteturnoveratestwithdrosophilacisregulatorymodules
AT kreitmanmartin doespositiveselectiondrivetranscriptionfactorbindingsiteturnoveratestwithdrosophilacisregulatorymodules