Cargando…
From Isotropic to Anisotropic Side Chain Representations: Comparison of Three Models for Residue Contact Estimation
The criterion to determine residue contact is a fundamental problem in deriving knowledge-based mean-force potential energy calculations for protein structures. A frequently used criterion is to require the side chain center-to-center distance or the [Image: see text]-to-[Image: see text] atom dista...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3084275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21552527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019238 |
_version_ | 1782202486728163328 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Weitao He, Jing |
author_facet | Sun, Weitao He, Jing |
author_sort | Sun, Weitao |
collection | PubMed |
description | The criterion to determine residue contact is a fundamental problem in deriving knowledge-based mean-force potential energy calculations for protein structures. A frequently used criterion is to require the side chain center-to-center distance or the [Image: see text]-to-[Image: see text] atom distance to be within a pre-determined cutoff distance. However, the spatially anisotropic nature of the side chain determines that it is challenging to identify the contact pairs. This study compares three side chain contact models: the Atom Distance criteria (ADC) model, the Isotropic Sphere Side chain (ISS) model and the Anisotropic Ellipsoid Side chain (AES) model using 424 high resolution protein structures in the Protein Data Bank. The results indicate that the ADC model is the most accurate and ISS is the worst. The AES model eliminates about 95% of the incorrectly counted contact-pairs in the ISS model. Algorithm analysis shows that AES model is the most computational intensive while ADC model has moderate computational cost. We derived a dataset of the mis-estimated contact pairs by AES model. The most misjudged pairs are Arg-Glu, Arg-Asp and Arg-Tyr. Such a dataset can be useful for developing the improved AES model by incorporating the pair-specific information for the cutoff distance. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3084275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30842752011-05-06 From Isotropic to Anisotropic Side Chain Representations: Comparison of Three Models for Residue Contact Estimation Sun, Weitao He, Jing PLoS One Research Article The criterion to determine residue contact is a fundamental problem in deriving knowledge-based mean-force potential energy calculations for protein structures. A frequently used criterion is to require the side chain center-to-center distance or the [Image: see text]-to-[Image: see text] atom distance to be within a pre-determined cutoff distance. However, the spatially anisotropic nature of the side chain determines that it is challenging to identify the contact pairs. This study compares three side chain contact models: the Atom Distance criteria (ADC) model, the Isotropic Sphere Side chain (ISS) model and the Anisotropic Ellipsoid Side chain (AES) model using 424 high resolution protein structures in the Protein Data Bank. The results indicate that the ADC model is the most accurate and ISS is the worst. The AES model eliminates about 95% of the incorrectly counted contact-pairs in the ISS model. Algorithm analysis shows that AES model is the most computational intensive while ADC model has moderate computational cost. We derived a dataset of the mis-estimated contact pairs by AES model. The most misjudged pairs are Arg-Glu, Arg-Asp and Arg-Tyr. Such a dataset can be useful for developing the improved AES model by incorporating the pair-specific information for the cutoff distance. Public Library of Science 2011-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3084275/ /pubmed/21552527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019238 Text en Sun, He. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sun, Weitao He, Jing From Isotropic to Anisotropic Side Chain Representations: Comparison of Three Models for Residue Contact Estimation |
title | From Isotropic to Anisotropic Side Chain Representations: Comparison of Three Models for Residue Contact Estimation |
title_full | From Isotropic to Anisotropic Side Chain Representations: Comparison of Three Models for Residue Contact Estimation |
title_fullStr | From Isotropic to Anisotropic Side Chain Representations: Comparison of Three Models for Residue Contact Estimation |
title_full_unstemmed | From Isotropic to Anisotropic Side Chain Representations: Comparison of Three Models for Residue Contact Estimation |
title_short | From Isotropic to Anisotropic Side Chain Representations: Comparison of Three Models for Residue Contact Estimation |
title_sort | from isotropic to anisotropic side chain representations: comparison of three models for residue contact estimation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3084275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21552527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunweitao fromisotropictoanisotropicsidechainrepresentationscomparisonofthreemodelsforresiduecontactestimation AT hejing fromisotropictoanisotropicsidechainrepresentationscomparisonofthreemodelsforresiduecontactestimation |