Cargando…
Kernel regression for fMRI pattern prediction
This paper introduces two kernel-based regression schemes to decode or predict brain states from functional brain scans as part of the Pittsburgh Brain Activity Interpretation Competition (PBAIC) 2007, in which our team was awarded first place. Our procedure involved image realignment, spatial smoot...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3084459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20348000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.058 |
_version_ | 1782202505739894784 |
---|---|
author | Chu, Carlton Ni, Yizhao Tan, Geoffrey Saunders, Craig J. Ashburner, John |
author_facet | Chu, Carlton Ni, Yizhao Tan, Geoffrey Saunders, Craig J. Ashburner, John |
author_sort | Chu, Carlton |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper introduces two kernel-based regression schemes to decode or predict brain states from functional brain scans as part of the Pittsburgh Brain Activity Interpretation Competition (PBAIC) 2007, in which our team was awarded first place. Our procedure involved image realignment, spatial smoothing, detrending of low-frequency drifts, and application of multivariate linear and non-linear kernel regression methods: namely kernel ridge regression (KRR) and relevance vector regression (RVR). RVR is based on a Bayesian framework, which automatically determines a sparse solution through maximization of marginal likelihood. KRR is the dual-form formulation of ridge regression, which solves regression problems with high dimensional data in a computationally efficient way. Feature selection based on prior knowledge about human brain function was also used. Post-processing by constrained deconvolution and re-convolution was used to furnish the prediction. This paper also contains a detailed description of how prior knowledge was used to fine tune predictions of specific “feature ratings,” which we believe is one of the key factors in our prediction accuracy. The impact of pre-processing was also evaluated, demonstrating that different pre-processing may lead to significantly different accuracies. Although the original work was aimed at the PBAIC, many techniques described in this paper can be generally applied to any fMRI decoding works to increase the prediction accuracy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3084459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Academic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30844592011-06-28 Kernel regression for fMRI pattern prediction Chu, Carlton Ni, Yizhao Tan, Geoffrey Saunders, Craig J. Ashburner, John Neuroimage Article This paper introduces two kernel-based regression schemes to decode or predict brain states from functional brain scans as part of the Pittsburgh Brain Activity Interpretation Competition (PBAIC) 2007, in which our team was awarded first place. Our procedure involved image realignment, spatial smoothing, detrending of low-frequency drifts, and application of multivariate linear and non-linear kernel regression methods: namely kernel ridge regression (KRR) and relevance vector regression (RVR). RVR is based on a Bayesian framework, which automatically determines a sparse solution through maximization of marginal likelihood. KRR is the dual-form formulation of ridge regression, which solves regression problems with high dimensional data in a computationally efficient way. Feature selection based on prior knowledge about human brain function was also used. Post-processing by constrained deconvolution and re-convolution was used to furnish the prediction. This paper also contains a detailed description of how prior knowledge was used to fine tune predictions of specific “feature ratings,” which we believe is one of the key factors in our prediction accuracy. The impact of pre-processing was also evaluated, demonstrating that different pre-processing may lead to significantly different accuracies. Although the original work was aimed at the PBAIC, many techniques described in this paper can be generally applied to any fMRI decoding works to increase the prediction accuracy. Academic Press 2011-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3084459/ /pubmed/20348000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.058 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license |
spellingShingle | Article Chu, Carlton Ni, Yizhao Tan, Geoffrey Saunders, Craig J. Ashburner, John Kernel regression for fMRI pattern prediction |
title | Kernel regression for fMRI pattern prediction |
title_full | Kernel regression for fMRI pattern prediction |
title_fullStr | Kernel regression for fMRI pattern prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | Kernel regression for fMRI pattern prediction |
title_short | Kernel regression for fMRI pattern prediction |
title_sort | kernel regression for fmri pattern prediction |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3084459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20348000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chucarlton kernelregressionforfmripatternprediction AT niyizhao kernelregressionforfmripatternprediction AT tangeoffrey kernelregressionforfmripatternprediction AT saunderscraigj kernelregressionforfmripatternprediction AT ashburnerjohn kernelregressionforfmripatternprediction |