Cargando…
Frailty effects in networks: comparison and identification of individual heterogeneity versus preferential attachment in evolving networks
Preferential attachment is a proportionate growth process in networks, where nodes receive new links in proportion to their current degree. Preferential attachment is a popular generative mechanism to explain the widespread observation of power-law-distributed networks. An alternative explanation fo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3084498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21572513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00746.x |
_version_ | 1782202512601776128 |
---|---|
author | de Blasio, Birgitte Freiesleben Seierstad, Taral Guldahl Aalen, Odd O |
author_facet | de Blasio, Birgitte Freiesleben Seierstad, Taral Guldahl Aalen, Odd O |
author_sort | de Blasio, Birgitte Freiesleben |
collection | PubMed |
description | Preferential attachment is a proportionate growth process in networks, where nodes receive new links in proportion to their current degree. Preferential attachment is a popular generative mechanism to explain the widespread observation of power-law-distributed networks. An alternative explanation for the phenomenon is a randomly grown network with large individual variation in growth rates among the nodes (frailty). We derive analytically the distribution of individual rates, which will reproduce the connectivity distribution that is obtained from a general preferential attachment process (Yule process), and the structural differences between the two types of graphs are examined by simulations. We present a statistical test to distinguish the two generative mechanisms from each other and we apply the test to both simulated data and two real data sets of scientific citation and sexual partner networks. The findings from the latter analyses argue for frailty effects as an important mechanism underlying the dynamics of complex networks. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3084498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30844982011-05-11 Frailty effects in networks: comparison and identification of individual heterogeneity versus preferential attachment in evolving networks de Blasio, Birgitte Freiesleben Seierstad, Taral Guldahl Aalen, Odd O J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat Original Articles Preferential attachment is a proportionate growth process in networks, where nodes receive new links in proportion to their current degree. Preferential attachment is a popular generative mechanism to explain the widespread observation of power-law-distributed networks. An alternative explanation for the phenomenon is a randomly grown network with large individual variation in growth rates among the nodes (frailty). We derive analytically the distribution of individual rates, which will reproduce the connectivity distribution that is obtained from a general preferential attachment process (Yule process), and the structural differences between the two types of graphs are examined by simulations. We present a statistical test to distinguish the two generative mechanisms from each other and we apply the test to both simulated data and two real data sets of scientific citation and sexual partner networks. The findings from the latter analyses argue for frailty effects as an important mechanism underlying the dynamics of complex networks. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3084498/ /pubmed/21572513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00746.x Text en Copyright © 2011 The Royal Statistical Society and Blackwell Publishing Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles de Blasio, Birgitte Freiesleben Seierstad, Taral Guldahl Aalen, Odd O Frailty effects in networks: comparison and identification of individual heterogeneity versus preferential attachment in evolving networks |
title | Frailty effects in networks: comparison and identification of individual heterogeneity versus preferential attachment in evolving networks |
title_full | Frailty effects in networks: comparison and identification of individual heterogeneity versus preferential attachment in evolving networks |
title_fullStr | Frailty effects in networks: comparison and identification of individual heterogeneity versus preferential attachment in evolving networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Frailty effects in networks: comparison and identification of individual heterogeneity versus preferential attachment in evolving networks |
title_short | Frailty effects in networks: comparison and identification of individual heterogeneity versus preferential attachment in evolving networks |
title_sort | frailty effects in networks: comparison and identification of individual heterogeneity versus preferential attachment in evolving networks |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3084498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21572513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00746.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deblasiobirgittefreiesleben frailtyeffectsinnetworkscomparisonandidentificationofindividualheterogeneityversuspreferentialattachmentinevolvingnetworks AT seierstadtaralguldahl frailtyeffectsinnetworkscomparisonandidentificationofindividualheterogeneityversuspreferentialattachmentinevolvingnetworks AT aalenoddo frailtyeffectsinnetworkscomparisonandidentificationofindividualheterogeneityversuspreferentialattachmentinevolvingnetworks |