Cargando…

Are Underlying Assumptions of Current Animal Models of Human Stroke Correct: from STAIRs to High Hurdles?

Animal models of acute ischemic stroke have been criticized for failing to translate to human stroke. Nevertheless, animal models are necessary to improve our understanding of stroke pathophysiology and to guide the development of new stroke therapies. The rabbit embolic clot model is one animal mod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turner, Renée J., Jickling, Glen C., Sharp, Frank R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3085747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21654913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12975-011-0067-3
_version_ 1782202650863861760
author Turner, Renée J.
Jickling, Glen C.
Sharp, Frank R.
author_facet Turner, Renée J.
Jickling, Glen C.
Sharp, Frank R.
author_sort Turner, Renée J.
collection PubMed
description Animal models of acute ischemic stroke have been criticized for failing to translate to human stroke. Nevertheless, animal models are necessary to improve our understanding of stroke pathophysiology and to guide the development of new stroke therapies. The rabbit embolic clot model is one animal model that has led to an effective therapy in human acute ischemic stroke, namely tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). We propose that potential compounds that demonstrate efficacy in non-rabbit animal models of acute ischemic stroke should also be tested in the rabbit embolic blood clot model and, where appropriate, compared to tPA prior to investigation in humans. Furthermore, the use of anesthesia needs to be considered as a major confounder in animal models of acute ischemic stroke, and death should be included as an outcome measure in animal stroke studies. These steps, along with the current STAIRs recommendations, may improve the successful translation of experimental therapies to clinical stroke treatments.
format Text
id pubmed-3085747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30857472011-06-06 Are Underlying Assumptions of Current Animal Models of Human Stroke Correct: from STAIRs to High Hurdles? Turner, Renée J. Jickling, Glen C. Sharp, Frank R. Transl Stroke Res Review Animal models of acute ischemic stroke have been criticized for failing to translate to human stroke. Nevertheless, animal models are necessary to improve our understanding of stroke pathophysiology and to guide the development of new stroke therapies. The rabbit embolic clot model is one animal model that has led to an effective therapy in human acute ischemic stroke, namely tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). We propose that potential compounds that demonstrate efficacy in non-rabbit animal models of acute ischemic stroke should also be tested in the rabbit embolic blood clot model and, where appropriate, compared to tPA prior to investigation in humans. Furthermore, the use of anesthesia needs to be considered as a major confounder in animal models of acute ischemic stroke, and death should be included as an outcome measure in animal stroke studies. These steps, along with the current STAIRs recommendations, may improve the successful translation of experimental therapies to clinical stroke treatments. Springer-Verlag 2011-02-12 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3085747/ /pubmed/21654913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12975-011-0067-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Turner, Renée J.
Jickling, Glen C.
Sharp, Frank R.
Are Underlying Assumptions of Current Animal Models of Human Stroke Correct: from STAIRs to High Hurdles?
title Are Underlying Assumptions of Current Animal Models of Human Stroke Correct: from STAIRs to High Hurdles?
title_full Are Underlying Assumptions of Current Animal Models of Human Stroke Correct: from STAIRs to High Hurdles?
title_fullStr Are Underlying Assumptions of Current Animal Models of Human Stroke Correct: from STAIRs to High Hurdles?
title_full_unstemmed Are Underlying Assumptions of Current Animal Models of Human Stroke Correct: from STAIRs to High Hurdles?
title_short Are Underlying Assumptions of Current Animal Models of Human Stroke Correct: from STAIRs to High Hurdles?
title_sort are underlying assumptions of current animal models of human stroke correct: from stairs to high hurdles?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3085747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21654913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12975-011-0067-3
work_keys_str_mv AT turnerreneej areunderlyingassumptionsofcurrentanimalmodelsofhumanstrokecorrectfromstairstohighhurdles
AT jicklingglenc areunderlyingassumptionsofcurrentanimalmodelsofhumanstrokecorrectfromstairstohighhurdles
AT sharpfrankr areunderlyingassumptionsofcurrentanimalmodelsofhumanstrokecorrectfromstairstohighhurdles