Cargando…

Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: a multicentre implementation study

BACKGROUND: The Xpert MTB/RIF test (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) can detect tuberculosis and its multidrug-resistant form with very high sensitivity and specificity in controlled studies, but no performance data exist from district and subdistrict health facilities in tuberculosis-endemic countries....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boehme, Catharina C, Nicol, Mark P, Nabeta, Pamela, Michael, Joy S, Gotuzzo, Eduardo, Tahirli, Rasim, Gler, Ma Tarcela, Blakemore, Robert, Worodria, William, Gray, Christen, Huang, Laurence, Caceres, Tatiana, Mehdiyev, Rafail, Raymond, Lawrence, Whitelaw, Andrew, Sagadevan, Kalaiselvan, Alexander, Heather, Albert, Heidi, Cobelens, Frank, Cox, Helen, Alland, David, Perkins, Mark D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lancet Publishing Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3085933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21507477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60438-8
_version_ 1782202667199627264
author Boehme, Catharina C
Nicol, Mark P
Nabeta, Pamela
Michael, Joy S
Gotuzzo, Eduardo
Tahirli, Rasim
Gler, Ma Tarcela
Blakemore, Robert
Worodria, William
Gray, Christen
Huang, Laurence
Caceres, Tatiana
Mehdiyev, Rafail
Raymond, Lawrence
Whitelaw, Andrew
Sagadevan, Kalaiselvan
Alexander, Heather
Albert, Heidi
Cobelens, Frank
Cox, Helen
Alland, David
Perkins, Mark D
author_facet Boehme, Catharina C
Nicol, Mark P
Nabeta, Pamela
Michael, Joy S
Gotuzzo, Eduardo
Tahirli, Rasim
Gler, Ma Tarcela
Blakemore, Robert
Worodria, William
Gray, Christen
Huang, Laurence
Caceres, Tatiana
Mehdiyev, Rafail
Raymond, Lawrence
Whitelaw, Andrew
Sagadevan, Kalaiselvan
Alexander, Heather
Albert, Heidi
Cobelens, Frank
Cox, Helen
Alland, David
Perkins, Mark D
author_sort Boehme, Catharina C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Xpert MTB/RIF test (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) can detect tuberculosis and its multidrug-resistant form with very high sensitivity and specificity in controlled studies, but no performance data exist from district and subdistrict health facilities in tuberculosis-endemic countries. We aimed to assess operational feasibility, accuracy, and effectiveness of implementation in such settings. METHODS: We assessed adults (≥18 years) with suspected tuberculosis or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis consecutively presenting with cough lasting at least 2 weeks to urban health centres in South Africa, Peru, and India, drug-resistance screening facilities in Azerbaijan and the Philippines, and an emergency room in Uganda. Patients were excluded from the main analyses if their second sputum sample was collected more than 1 week after the first sample, or if no valid reference standard or MTB/RIF test was available. We compared one-off direct MTB/RIF testing in nine microscopy laboratories adjacent to study sites with 2–3 sputum smears and 1–3 cultures, dependent on site, and drug-susceptibility testing. We assessed indicators of robustness including indeterminate rate and between-site performance, and compared time to detection, reporting, and treatment, and patient dropouts for the techniques used. FINDINGS: We enrolled 6648 participants between Aug 11, 2009, and June 26, 2010. One-off MTB/RIF testing detected 933 (90·3%) of 1033 culture-confirmed cases of tuberculosis, compared with 699 (67·1%) of 1041 for microscopy. MTB/RIF test sensitivity was 76·9% in smear-negative, culture-positive patients (296 of 385 samples), and 99·0% specific (2846 of 2876 non-tuberculosis samples). MTB/RIF test sensitivity for rifampicin resistance was 94·4% (236 of 250) and specificity was 98·3% (796 of 810). Unlike microscopy, MTB/RIF test sensitivity was not significantly lower in patients with HIV co-infection. Median time to detection of tuberculosis for the MTB/RIF test was 0 days (IQR 0–1), compared with 1 day (0–1) for microscopy, 30 days (23–43) for solid culture, and 16 days (13–21) for liquid culture. Median time to detection of resistance was 20 days (10–26) for line-probe assay and 106 days (30–124) for conventional drug-susceptibility testing. Use of the MTB/RIF test reduced median time to treatment for smear-negative tuberculosis from 56 days (39–81) to 5 days (2–8). The indeterminate rate of MTB/RIF testing was 2·4% (126 of 5321 samples) compared with 4·6% (441 of 9690) for cultures. INTERPRETATION: The MTB/RIF test can effectively be used in low-resource settings to simplify patients' access to early and accurate diagnosis, thereby potentially decreasing morbidity associated with diagnostic delay, dropout and mistreatment. FUNDING: Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (TA2007.40200.009), Wellcome Trust (085251/B/08/Z), and UK Department for International Development.
format Text
id pubmed-3085933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Lancet Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30859332011-07-12 Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: a multicentre implementation study Boehme, Catharina C Nicol, Mark P Nabeta, Pamela Michael, Joy S Gotuzzo, Eduardo Tahirli, Rasim Gler, Ma Tarcela Blakemore, Robert Worodria, William Gray, Christen Huang, Laurence Caceres, Tatiana Mehdiyev, Rafail Raymond, Lawrence Whitelaw, Andrew Sagadevan, Kalaiselvan Alexander, Heather Albert, Heidi Cobelens, Frank Cox, Helen Alland, David Perkins, Mark D Lancet Fast track — Articles BACKGROUND: The Xpert MTB/RIF test (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) can detect tuberculosis and its multidrug-resistant form with very high sensitivity and specificity in controlled studies, but no performance data exist from district and subdistrict health facilities in tuberculosis-endemic countries. We aimed to assess operational feasibility, accuracy, and effectiveness of implementation in such settings. METHODS: We assessed adults (≥18 years) with suspected tuberculosis or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis consecutively presenting with cough lasting at least 2 weeks to urban health centres in South Africa, Peru, and India, drug-resistance screening facilities in Azerbaijan and the Philippines, and an emergency room in Uganda. Patients were excluded from the main analyses if their second sputum sample was collected more than 1 week after the first sample, or if no valid reference standard or MTB/RIF test was available. We compared one-off direct MTB/RIF testing in nine microscopy laboratories adjacent to study sites with 2–3 sputum smears and 1–3 cultures, dependent on site, and drug-susceptibility testing. We assessed indicators of robustness including indeterminate rate and between-site performance, and compared time to detection, reporting, and treatment, and patient dropouts for the techniques used. FINDINGS: We enrolled 6648 participants between Aug 11, 2009, and June 26, 2010. One-off MTB/RIF testing detected 933 (90·3%) of 1033 culture-confirmed cases of tuberculosis, compared with 699 (67·1%) of 1041 for microscopy. MTB/RIF test sensitivity was 76·9% in smear-negative, culture-positive patients (296 of 385 samples), and 99·0% specific (2846 of 2876 non-tuberculosis samples). MTB/RIF test sensitivity for rifampicin resistance was 94·4% (236 of 250) and specificity was 98·3% (796 of 810). Unlike microscopy, MTB/RIF test sensitivity was not significantly lower in patients with HIV co-infection. Median time to detection of tuberculosis for the MTB/RIF test was 0 days (IQR 0–1), compared with 1 day (0–1) for microscopy, 30 days (23–43) for solid culture, and 16 days (13–21) for liquid culture. Median time to detection of resistance was 20 days (10–26) for line-probe assay and 106 days (30–124) for conventional drug-susceptibility testing. Use of the MTB/RIF test reduced median time to treatment for smear-negative tuberculosis from 56 days (39–81) to 5 days (2–8). The indeterminate rate of MTB/RIF testing was 2·4% (126 of 5321 samples) compared with 4·6% (441 of 9690) for cultures. INTERPRETATION: The MTB/RIF test can effectively be used in low-resource settings to simplify patients' access to early and accurate diagnosis, thereby potentially decreasing morbidity associated with diagnostic delay, dropout and mistreatment. FUNDING: Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (TA2007.40200.009), Wellcome Trust (085251/B/08/Z), and UK Department for International Development. Lancet Publishing Group 2011-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3085933/ /pubmed/21507477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60438-8 Text en © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authorsview.authors/supplementalterms1.0) .
spellingShingle Fast track — Articles
Boehme, Catharina C
Nicol, Mark P
Nabeta, Pamela
Michael, Joy S
Gotuzzo, Eduardo
Tahirli, Rasim
Gler, Ma Tarcela
Blakemore, Robert
Worodria, William
Gray, Christen
Huang, Laurence
Caceres, Tatiana
Mehdiyev, Rafail
Raymond, Lawrence
Whitelaw, Andrew
Sagadevan, Kalaiselvan
Alexander, Heather
Albert, Heidi
Cobelens, Frank
Cox, Helen
Alland, David
Perkins, Mark D
Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: a multicentre implementation study
title Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: a multicentre implementation study
title_full Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: a multicentre implementation study
title_fullStr Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: a multicentre implementation study
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: a multicentre implementation study
title_short Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: a multicentre implementation study
title_sort feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the xpert mtb/rif test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: a multicentre implementation study
topic Fast track — Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3085933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21507477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60438-8
work_keys_str_mv AT boehmecatharinac feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT nicolmarkp feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT nabetapamela feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT michaeljoys feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT gotuzzoeduardo feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT tahirlirasim feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT glermatarcela feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT blakemorerobert feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT worodriawilliam feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT graychristen feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT huanglaurence feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT cacerestatiana feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT mehdiyevrafail feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT raymondlawrence feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT whitelawandrew feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT sagadevankalaiselvan feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT alexanderheather feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT albertheidi feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT cobelensfrank feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT coxhelen feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT allanddavid feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy
AT perkinsmarkd feasibilitydiagnosticaccuracyandeffectivenessofdecentraliseduseofthexpertmtbriftestfordiagnosisoftuberculosisandmultidrugresistanceamulticentreimplementationstudy