Cargando…
Meta-analyses of Adverse Effects Data Derived from Randomised Controlled Trials as Compared to Observational Studies: Methodological Overview
BACKGROUND: There is considerable debate as to the relative merits of using randomised controlled trial (RCT) data as opposed to observational data in systematic reviews of adverse effects. This meta-analysis of meta-analyses aimed to assess the level of agreement or disagreement in the estimates of...
Autores principales: | Golder, Su, Loke, Yoon K., Bland, Martin |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3086872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21559325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001026 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of Pooled Risk Estimates for Adverse Effects from Different Observational Study Designs: Methodological Overview
por: Golder, Su, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Overview of systematic reviews of therapeutic ranges: methodologies and recommendations for practice
por: Cooney, Lewis, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The development of search filters for adverse effects of surgical interventions in medline and Embase
por: Golder, Su, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The feasibility of a search filter for the adverse effects of nondrug interventions in MEDLINE and Embase
por: Golder, Su, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions
por: Golder, Su, et al.
Publicado: (2006)