Cargando…
Is Fibreoptic Percutaneous Tracheostomy in ICU A Breakthrough
BACKGROUND: In ICUs, bedside percutaneous tracheostomy (pct) is commonly performed, but it is associated with certain drawbacks as paratracheal placement, posterior tracheal wall injury and tracheoesophageal fistula. To address these fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB) guided PCT was introduced. We aimed...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3087259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21547181 |
_version_ | 1782202754730557440 |
---|---|
author | Agarwal, Ankit Singh, DK |
author_facet | Agarwal, Ankit Singh, DK |
author_sort | Agarwal, Ankit |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In ICUs, bedside percutaneous tracheostomy (pct) is commonly performed, but it is associated with certain drawbacks as paratracheal placement, posterior tracheal wall injury and tracheoesophageal fistula. To address these fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB) guided PCT was introduced. We aimed to compare both these methods. PATIENTS & METHODS: We compared 60 age & sex matched patients into two groups of 30 each. In group 1 tracheostomy was performed by the conventional Ciaglia's method. In group 2, a fibreoptic bronchoscope was used in addition with the aid of an assistant. RESULTS: The fiberoptic method took more time than the conventional method. (18±3min vs 15±2min (p=0.001)). The average no. of attempts at insertion of needle was 2.4 in group 1 and 1.2 in group 2 (p=0.001). The fall in SpO2 to <90% was seen in 1 patient in group 1 and in 6 patients in group 2, so much so that the procedure had to be abandoned in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: FOB though definitely advantageous over CPCT in terms of lesser complications and being highly useful in the obese, short necked, and those with scar marks, is not without drawbacks such as requirement of additional staff and increased expenditure. The main being inability to be used in patients with low respiratory reserve. Overall it would be complimentary for any ICU to have FOB facility and must be used in select group of patients. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3087259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30872592011-05-05 Is Fibreoptic Percutaneous Tracheostomy in ICU A Breakthrough Agarwal, Ankit Singh, DK J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Research Paper BACKGROUND: In ICUs, bedside percutaneous tracheostomy (pct) is commonly performed, but it is associated with certain drawbacks as paratracheal placement, posterior tracheal wall injury and tracheoesophageal fistula. To address these fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB) guided PCT was introduced. We aimed to compare both these methods. PATIENTS & METHODS: We compared 60 age & sex matched patients into two groups of 30 each. In group 1 tracheostomy was performed by the conventional Ciaglia's method. In group 2, a fibreoptic bronchoscope was used in addition with the aid of an assistant. RESULTS: The fiberoptic method took more time than the conventional method. (18±3min vs 15±2min (p=0.001)). The average no. of attempts at insertion of needle was 2.4 in group 1 and 1.2 in group 2 (p=0.001). The fall in SpO2 to <90% was seen in 1 patient in group 1 and in 6 patients in group 2, so much so that the procedure had to be abandoned in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: FOB though definitely advantageous over CPCT in terms of lesser complications and being highly useful in the obese, short necked, and those with scar marks, is not without drawbacks such as requirement of additional staff and increased expenditure. The main being inability to be used in patients with low respiratory reserve. Overall it would be complimentary for any ICU to have FOB facility and must be used in select group of patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3087259/ /pubmed/21547181 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Agarwal, Ankit Singh, DK Is Fibreoptic Percutaneous Tracheostomy in ICU A Breakthrough |
title | Is Fibreoptic Percutaneous Tracheostomy in ICU A Breakthrough |
title_full | Is Fibreoptic Percutaneous Tracheostomy in ICU A Breakthrough |
title_fullStr | Is Fibreoptic Percutaneous Tracheostomy in ICU A Breakthrough |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Fibreoptic Percutaneous Tracheostomy in ICU A Breakthrough |
title_short | Is Fibreoptic Percutaneous Tracheostomy in ICU A Breakthrough |
title_sort | is fibreoptic percutaneous tracheostomy in icu a breakthrough |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3087259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21547181 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agarwalankit isfibreopticpercutaneoustracheostomyinicuabreakthrough AT singhdk isfibreopticpercutaneoustracheostomyinicuabreakthrough |