Cargando…

Meta-analysis of haplotype-association studies: comparison of methods and empirical evaluation of the literature

BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis is a popular methodology in several fields of medical research, including genetic association studies. However, the methods used for meta-analysis of association studies that report haplotypes have not been studied in detail. In this work, methods for performing meta-analys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bagos, Pantelis G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3087509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21247440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-12-8
_version_ 1782202789912379392
author Bagos, Pantelis G
author_facet Bagos, Pantelis G
author_sort Bagos, Pantelis G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis is a popular methodology in several fields of medical research, including genetic association studies. However, the methods used for meta-analysis of association studies that report haplotypes have not been studied in detail. In this work, methods for performing meta-analysis of haplotype association studies are summarized, compared and presented in a unified framework along with an empirical evaluation of the literature. RESULTS: We present multivariate methods that use summary-based data as well as methods that use binary and count data in a generalized linear mixed model framework (logistic regression, multinomial regression and Poisson regression). The methods presented here avoid the inflation of the type I error rate that could be the result of the traditional approach of comparing a haplotype against the remaining ones, whereas, they can be fitted using standard software. Moreover, formal global tests are presented for assessing the statistical significance of the overall association. Although the methods presented here assume that the haplotypes are directly observed, they can be easily extended to allow for such an uncertainty by weighting the haplotypes by their probability. CONCLUSIONS: An empirical evaluation of the published literature and a comparison against the meta-analyses that use single nucleotide polymorphisms, suggests that the studies reporting meta-analysis of haplotypes contain approximately half of the included studies and produce significant results twice more often. We show that this excess of statistically significant results, stems from the sub-optimal method of analysis used and, in approximately half of the cases, the statistical significance is refuted if the data are properly re-analyzed. Illustrative examples of code are given in Stata and it is anticipated that the methods developed in this work will be widely applied in the meta-analysis of haplotype association studies.
format Text
id pubmed-3087509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30875092011-07-08 Meta-analysis of haplotype-association studies: comparison of methods and empirical evaluation of the literature Bagos, Pantelis G BMC Genet Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis is a popular methodology in several fields of medical research, including genetic association studies. However, the methods used for meta-analysis of association studies that report haplotypes have not been studied in detail. In this work, methods for performing meta-analysis of haplotype association studies are summarized, compared and presented in a unified framework along with an empirical evaluation of the literature. RESULTS: We present multivariate methods that use summary-based data as well as methods that use binary and count data in a generalized linear mixed model framework (logistic regression, multinomial regression and Poisson regression). The methods presented here avoid the inflation of the type I error rate that could be the result of the traditional approach of comparing a haplotype against the remaining ones, whereas, they can be fitted using standard software. Moreover, formal global tests are presented for assessing the statistical significance of the overall association. Although the methods presented here assume that the haplotypes are directly observed, they can be easily extended to allow for such an uncertainty by weighting the haplotypes by their probability. CONCLUSIONS: An empirical evaluation of the published literature and a comparison against the meta-analyses that use single nucleotide polymorphisms, suggests that the studies reporting meta-analysis of haplotypes contain approximately half of the included studies and produce significant results twice more often. We show that this excess of statistically significant results, stems from the sub-optimal method of analysis used and, in approximately half of the cases, the statistical significance is refuted if the data are properly re-analyzed. Illustrative examples of code are given in Stata and it is anticipated that the methods developed in this work will be widely applied in the meta-analysis of haplotype association studies. BioMed Central 2011-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3087509/ /pubmed/21247440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-12-8 Text en Copyright ©2011 Bagos; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Bagos, Pantelis G
Meta-analysis of haplotype-association studies: comparison of methods and empirical evaluation of the literature
title Meta-analysis of haplotype-association studies: comparison of methods and empirical evaluation of the literature
title_full Meta-analysis of haplotype-association studies: comparison of methods and empirical evaluation of the literature
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of haplotype-association studies: comparison of methods and empirical evaluation of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of haplotype-association studies: comparison of methods and empirical evaluation of the literature
title_short Meta-analysis of haplotype-association studies: comparison of methods and empirical evaluation of the literature
title_sort meta-analysis of haplotype-association studies: comparison of methods and empirical evaluation of the literature
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3087509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21247440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-12-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bagospantelisg metaanalysisofhaplotypeassociationstudiescomparisonofmethodsandempiricalevaluationoftheliterature