Cargando…

Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool

OBJECTIVE: To describe the process of developing and validating the Canadian Association of Paediatric Health Centres Trigger Tool (CPTT). METHODS: Five existing trigger tools were consolidated with duplicate triggers eliminated. After a risk analysis and modified Delphi process, the tool was reduce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matlow, Anne G, Cronin, Catherine M G, Flintoft, Virginia, Nijssen-Jordan, Cheri, Fleming, Mark, Brady-Fryer, Barbara, Hiltz, Mary-Ann, Orrbine, Elaine, Baker, G Ross
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3088437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21242527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.041152
_version_ 1782202892245008384
author Matlow, Anne G
Cronin, Catherine M G
Flintoft, Virginia
Nijssen-Jordan, Cheri
Fleming, Mark
Brady-Fryer, Barbara
Hiltz, Mary-Ann
Orrbine, Elaine
Baker, G Ross
author_facet Matlow, Anne G
Cronin, Catherine M G
Flintoft, Virginia
Nijssen-Jordan, Cheri
Fleming, Mark
Brady-Fryer, Barbara
Hiltz, Mary-Ann
Orrbine, Elaine
Baker, G Ross
author_sort Matlow, Anne G
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe the process of developing and validating the Canadian Association of Paediatric Health Centres Trigger Tool (CPTT). METHODS: Five existing trigger tools were consolidated with duplicate triggers eliminated. After a risk analysis and modified Delphi process, the tool was reduced from 94 to 47 triggers. Feasibility of use was tested, reviewing 40 charts in three hospitals. For validation, charts were randomly selected across four age groups, half medical/half surgical diagnoses, from six paediatric academic health sciences centres. 591 charts were reviewed by six nurses (for triggers and adverse events (AEs)) and three physicians (for AEs only). The incidence of trigger- and AE-positive charts was documented, and the sensitivity and specificity of the tool to identify charts with AEs were determined. Identification of AEs by nurses and physicians was compared. The positive predictive value (PPV) of each trigger was calculated and the ratio of false- to true-positive AE predictors analysed for each trigger. RESULTS: Nurses rated the CPTT easy to use and identified triggers in 61.1% (361/591; 95% CI 57.2 to 65.0) of patient charts; physicians identified AEs in 15.1% (89/ 591, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.43). Over a third of patients with AEs were neonates. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.88 and 0.44, respectively. Nurse and physician AE assessments correlated poorly. The PPV for each trigger ranged from 0 to 88.3%. Triggers with a false/true-positive ratio of >0.7 were eliminated, resulting in the final 35-trigger CPTT. CONCLUSIONS: The CPTT is the first validated, comprehensive trigger tool available to detect AEs in children hospitalised in acute care facilities.
format Text
id pubmed-3088437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30884372011-05-16 Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool Matlow, Anne G Cronin, Catherine M G Flintoft, Virginia Nijssen-Jordan, Cheri Fleming, Mark Brady-Fryer, Barbara Hiltz, Mary-Ann Orrbine, Elaine Baker, G Ross BMJ Qual Saf Original Research OBJECTIVE: To describe the process of developing and validating the Canadian Association of Paediatric Health Centres Trigger Tool (CPTT). METHODS: Five existing trigger tools were consolidated with duplicate triggers eliminated. After a risk analysis and modified Delphi process, the tool was reduced from 94 to 47 triggers. Feasibility of use was tested, reviewing 40 charts in three hospitals. For validation, charts were randomly selected across four age groups, half medical/half surgical diagnoses, from six paediatric academic health sciences centres. 591 charts were reviewed by six nurses (for triggers and adverse events (AEs)) and three physicians (for AEs only). The incidence of trigger- and AE-positive charts was documented, and the sensitivity and specificity of the tool to identify charts with AEs were determined. Identification of AEs by nurses and physicians was compared. The positive predictive value (PPV) of each trigger was calculated and the ratio of false- to true-positive AE predictors analysed for each trigger. RESULTS: Nurses rated the CPTT easy to use and identified triggers in 61.1% (361/591; 95% CI 57.2 to 65.0) of patient charts; physicians identified AEs in 15.1% (89/ 591, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.43). Over a third of patients with AEs were neonates. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.88 and 0.44, respectively. Nurse and physician AE assessments correlated poorly. The PPV for each trigger ranged from 0 to 88.3%. Triggers with a false/true-positive ratio of >0.7 were eliminated, resulting in the final 35-trigger CPTT. CONCLUSIONS: The CPTT is the first validated, comprehensive trigger tool available to detect AEs in children hospitalised in acute care facilities. BMJ Group 2011-01-17 2011-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3088437/ /pubmed/21242527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.041152 Text en © 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Original Research
Matlow, Anne G
Cronin, Catherine M G
Flintoft, Virginia
Nijssen-Jordan, Cheri
Fleming, Mark
Brady-Fryer, Barbara
Hiltz, Mary-Ann
Orrbine, Elaine
Baker, G Ross
Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool
title Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool
title_full Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool
title_fullStr Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool
title_full_unstemmed Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool
title_short Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool
title_sort description of the development and validation of the canadian paediatric trigger tool
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3088437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21242527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.041152
work_keys_str_mv AT matlowanneg descriptionofthedevelopmentandvalidationofthecanadianpaediatrictriggertool
AT cronincatherinemg descriptionofthedevelopmentandvalidationofthecanadianpaediatrictriggertool
AT flintoftvirginia descriptionofthedevelopmentandvalidationofthecanadianpaediatrictriggertool
AT nijssenjordancheri descriptionofthedevelopmentandvalidationofthecanadianpaediatrictriggertool
AT flemingmark descriptionofthedevelopmentandvalidationofthecanadianpaediatrictriggertool
AT bradyfryerbarbara descriptionofthedevelopmentandvalidationofthecanadianpaediatrictriggertool
AT hiltzmaryann descriptionofthedevelopmentandvalidationofthecanadianpaediatrictriggertool
AT orrbineelaine descriptionofthedevelopmentandvalidationofthecanadianpaediatrictriggertool
AT bakergross descriptionofthedevelopmentandvalidationofthecanadianpaediatrictriggertool