Cargando…
Rethinking scientific responsibility
Researchers should be made co-responsible for the wider consequences of their research focus and the application of their findings. This paper describes a meta-reflection procedure that can be used as a tool to enhance scientific responsibility and reflective practice. The point of departure is that...
Autores principales: | Forssén, Annika, Meland, Eivind, Hetlevik, Irene, Strand, Roger |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3088477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21266389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.038828 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Ethics of scientific publication
por: Mandal, Jharna, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Ethics of authorship in scientific publications
por: Mandal, Jharna, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage
por: Sweeney, Lorna, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Public reporting of clinical trial findings as an ethical responsibility to participants: a qualitative study
por: Morrow, Richard L, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Legislation and Policy Recommendations on Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation From an International Consensus Forum
por: Toews, Maeghan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)