Cargando…

Protocol Dependence of Sequencing-Based Gene Expression Measurements

RNA Seq provides unparalleled levels of information about the transcriptome including precise expression levels over a wide dynamic range. It is essential to understand how technical variation impacts the quality and interpretability of results, how potential errors could be introduced by the protoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raz, Tal, Kapranov, Philipp, Lipson, Doron, Letovsky, Stan, Milos, Patrice M., Thompson, John F.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3089619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21573114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019287
_version_ 1782203064265998336
author Raz, Tal
Kapranov, Philipp
Lipson, Doron
Letovsky, Stan
Milos, Patrice M.
Thompson, John F.
author_facet Raz, Tal
Kapranov, Philipp
Lipson, Doron
Letovsky, Stan
Milos, Patrice M.
Thompson, John F.
author_sort Raz, Tal
collection PubMed
description RNA Seq provides unparalleled levels of information about the transcriptome including precise expression levels over a wide dynamic range. It is essential to understand how technical variation impacts the quality and interpretability of results, how potential errors could be introduced by the protocol, how the source of RNA affects transcript detection, and how all of these variations can impact the conclusions drawn. Multiple human RNA samples were used to assess RNA fragmentation, RNA fractionation, cDNA synthesis, and single versus multiple tag counting. Though protocols employing polyA RNA selection generate the highest number of non-ribosomal reads and the most precise measurements for coding transcripts, such protocols were found to detect only a fraction of the non-ribosomal RNA in human cells. PolyA RNA excludes thousands of annotated and even more unannotated transcripts, resulting in an incomplete view of the transcriptome. Ribosomal-depleted RNA provides a more cost-effective method for generating complete transcriptome coverage. Expression measurements using single tag counting provided advantages for assessing gene expression and for detecting short RNAs relative to multi-read protocols. Detection of short RNAs was also hampered by RNA fragmentation. Thus, this work will help researchers choose from among a range of options when analyzing gene expression, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.
format Text
id pubmed-3089619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30896192011-05-13 Protocol Dependence of Sequencing-Based Gene Expression Measurements Raz, Tal Kapranov, Philipp Lipson, Doron Letovsky, Stan Milos, Patrice M. Thompson, John F. PLoS One Research Article RNA Seq provides unparalleled levels of information about the transcriptome including precise expression levels over a wide dynamic range. It is essential to understand how technical variation impacts the quality and interpretability of results, how potential errors could be introduced by the protocol, how the source of RNA affects transcript detection, and how all of these variations can impact the conclusions drawn. Multiple human RNA samples were used to assess RNA fragmentation, RNA fractionation, cDNA synthesis, and single versus multiple tag counting. Though protocols employing polyA RNA selection generate the highest number of non-ribosomal reads and the most precise measurements for coding transcripts, such protocols were found to detect only a fraction of the non-ribosomal RNA in human cells. PolyA RNA excludes thousands of annotated and even more unannotated transcripts, resulting in an incomplete view of the transcriptome. Ribosomal-depleted RNA provides a more cost-effective method for generating complete transcriptome coverage. Expression measurements using single tag counting provided advantages for assessing gene expression and for detecting short RNAs relative to multi-read protocols. Detection of short RNAs was also hampered by RNA fragmentation. Thus, this work will help researchers choose from among a range of options when analyzing gene expression, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Public Library of Science 2011-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3089619/ /pubmed/21573114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019287 Text en Raz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Raz, Tal
Kapranov, Philipp
Lipson, Doron
Letovsky, Stan
Milos, Patrice M.
Thompson, John F.
Protocol Dependence of Sequencing-Based Gene Expression Measurements
title Protocol Dependence of Sequencing-Based Gene Expression Measurements
title_full Protocol Dependence of Sequencing-Based Gene Expression Measurements
title_fullStr Protocol Dependence of Sequencing-Based Gene Expression Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Protocol Dependence of Sequencing-Based Gene Expression Measurements
title_short Protocol Dependence of Sequencing-Based Gene Expression Measurements
title_sort protocol dependence of sequencing-based gene expression measurements
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3089619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21573114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019287
work_keys_str_mv AT raztal protocoldependenceofsequencingbasedgeneexpressionmeasurements
AT kapranovphilipp protocoldependenceofsequencingbasedgeneexpressionmeasurements
AT lipsondoron protocoldependenceofsequencingbasedgeneexpressionmeasurements
AT letovskystan protocoldependenceofsequencingbasedgeneexpressionmeasurements
AT milospatricem protocoldependenceofsequencingbasedgeneexpressionmeasurements
AT thompsonjohnf protocoldependenceofsequencingbasedgeneexpressionmeasurements