Cargando…
Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel
BACKGROUND: Today, more than 70% of patients with primary node-negative breast cancer are cured by local therapy alone. Many patients receive overtreatment by adjuvant chemotherapy due to inadequate risk assessment. So far, few clinical trials have prospectively evaluated tumor biology based prognos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3089797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-140 |
_version_ | 1782203080939405312 |
---|---|
author | Kantelhardt, Eva J Vetter, Martina Schmidt, Marcus Veyret, Corinne Augustin, Doris Hanf, Volker Meisner, Christoph Paepke, Daniela Schmitt, Manfred Sweep, Fred von Minckwitz, Gunter Martin, Pierre-Marie Jaenicke, Fritz Thomssen, Christoph Harbeck, Nadia |
author_facet | Kantelhardt, Eva J Vetter, Martina Schmidt, Marcus Veyret, Corinne Augustin, Doris Hanf, Volker Meisner, Christoph Paepke, Daniela Schmitt, Manfred Sweep, Fred von Minckwitz, Gunter Martin, Pierre-Marie Jaenicke, Fritz Thomssen, Christoph Harbeck, Nadia |
author_sort | Kantelhardt, Eva J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Today, more than 70% of patients with primary node-negative breast cancer are cured by local therapy alone. Many patients receive overtreatment by adjuvant chemotherapy due to inadequate risk assessment. So far, few clinical trials have prospectively evaluated tumor biology based prognostic factors. Risk assessment by a biological algorithm including invasion factors urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) will assess up to 35-55% of node-negative patients as low-risk and thus avoid chemotherapy. In contrast, a clinical-pathological algorithm will only classify 20-40% of patients as low-risk. High-risk node-negative patients should receive chemotherapy. Anthracycline-based regimens are accepted as a standard, the additional benefit of taxanes remains an open question. METHODS/DESIGN: The international NNBC3 ("Node Negative Breast Cancer 3-Europe") trial compares biological risk assessment (UP) using invasion factors uPA/PAI-1 with a clinical-pathological algorithm (CP). In this trial, the type of risk assessment (CP or UP) was chosen upfront by each center for its patients. Fresh frozen tissue was obtained to determine uPA/PAI-1 using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Patients assessed as high-risk were stratified by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and then randomised to receive anthracycline-containing chemotherapy 5-Fluorouracil (F)/Epirubicin (E)/Cyclophosphymide (C) or an anthracycline-taxane sequence (FE(100)C*6 versus FE(100)C*3 followed by Docetaxel(100)*3). DISCUSSION: In this trial, 4,149 node-negative patients with operable breast cancer from 153 centers in Germany and France were included since 2002. Measurement of uPA/PAI-1 by ELISA was performed with standardised central quality assurance for 2,497 patients (60%) from 56 "UP"-centers. The NNBC 3-Europe trial showed that inclusion of patients into a clinical phase III trial is feasible based on biological testing of fresh frozen tumor material. In addition, 2,661 patients were classified as high-risk and thus received chemotherapy. As adjuvant chemotherapy, 1,334 high-risk patients received FE(100)C-Docetaxel(100), and 1,327 received French FE(100)C. No unexpected toxicities were observed. Chemotherapy efficacy and comparison of UP with CP will be evaluated after longer follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinical Trials.gov NCT01222052. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3089797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30897972011-05-08 Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel Kantelhardt, Eva J Vetter, Martina Schmidt, Marcus Veyret, Corinne Augustin, Doris Hanf, Volker Meisner, Christoph Paepke, Daniela Schmitt, Manfred Sweep, Fred von Minckwitz, Gunter Martin, Pierre-Marie Jaenicke, Fritz Thomssen, Christoph Harbeck, Nadia BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Today, more than 70% of patients with primary node-negative breast cancer are cured by local therapy alone. Many patients receive overtreatment by adjuvant chemotherapy due to inadequate risk assessment. So far, few clinical trials have prospectively evaluated tumor biology based prognostic factors. Risk assessment by a biological algorithm including invasion factors urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) will assess up to 35-55% of node-negative patients as low-risk and thus avoid chemotherapy. In contrast, a clinical-pathological algorithm will only classify 20-40% of patients as low-risk. High-risk node-negative patients should receive chemotherapy. Anthracycline-based regimens are accepted as a standard, the additional benefit of taxanes remains an open question. METHODS/DESIGN: The international NNBC3 ("Node Negative Breast Cancer 3-Europe") trial compares biological risk assessment (UP) using invasion factors uPA/PAI-1 with a clinical-pathological algorithm (CP). In this trial, the type of risk assessment (CP or UP) was chosen upfront by each center for its patients. Fresh frozen tissue was obtained to determine uPA/PAI-1 using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Patients assessed as high-risk were stratified by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and then randomised to receive anthracycline-containing chemotherapy 5-Fluorouracil (F)/Epirubicin (E)/Cyclophosphymide (C) or an anthracycline-taxane sequence (FE(100)C*6 versus FE(100)C*3 followed by Docetaxel(100)*3). DISCUSSION: In this trial, 4,149 node-negative patients with operable breast cancer from 153 centers in Germany and France were included since 2002. Measurement of uPA/PAI-1 by ELISA was performed with standardised central quality assurance for 2,497 patients (60%) from 56 "UP"-centers. The NNBC 3-Europe trial showed that inclusion of patients into a clinical phase III trial is feasible based on biological testing of fresh frozen tumor material. In addition, 2,661 patients were classified as high-risk and thus received chemotherapy. As adjuvant chemotherapy, 1,334 high-risk patients received FE(100)C-Docetaxel(100), and 1,327 received French FE(100)C. No unexpected toxicities were observed. Chemotherapy efficacy and comparison of UP with CP will be evaluated after longer follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinical Trials.gov NCT01222052. BioMed Central 2011-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3089797/ /pubmed/21496284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-140 Text en Copyright ©2011 Kantelhardt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Kantelhardt, Eva J Vetter, Martina Schmidt, Marcus Veyret, Corinne Augustin, Doris Hanf, Volker Meisner, Christoph Paepke, Daniela Schmitt, Manfred Sweep, Fred von Minckwitz, Gunter Martin, Pierre-Marie Jaenicke, Fritz Thomssen, Christoph Harbeck, Nadia Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel |
title | Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel |
title_full | Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel |
title_fullStr | Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel |
title_short | Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel |
title_sort | prospective evaluation of prognostic factors upa/pai-1 in node-negative breast cancer: phase iii nnbc3-europe trial (ago, gbg, eortc-pbg) comparing 6 × fec versus 3 × fec/3 × docetaxel |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3089797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kantelhardtevaj prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT vettermartina prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT schmidtmarcus prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT veyretcorinne prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT augustindoris prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT hanfvolker prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT meisnerchristoph prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT paepkedaniela prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT schmittmanfred prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT sweepfred prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT vonminckwitzgunter prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT martinpierremarie prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT jaenickefritz prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT thomssenchristoph prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel AT harbecknadia prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel |