Cargando…

Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel

BACKGROUND: Today, more than 70% of patients with primary node-negative breast cancer are cured by local therapy alone. Many patients receive overtreatment by adjuvant chemotherapy due to inadequate risk assessment. So far, few clinical trials have prospectively evaluated tumor biology based prognos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kantelhardt, Eva J, Vetter, Martina, Schmidt, Marcus, Veyret, Corinne, Augustin, Doris, Hanf, Volker, Meisner, Christoph, Paepke, Daniela, Schmitt, Manfred, Sweep, Fred, von Minckwitz, Gunter, Martin, Pierre-Marie, Jaenicke, Fritz, Thomssen, Christoph, Harbeck, Nadia
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3089797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-140
_version_ 1782203080939405312
author Kantelhardt, Eva J
Vetter, Martina
Schmidt, Marcus
Veyret, Corinne
Augustin, Doris
Hanf, Volker
Meisner, Christoph
Paepke, Daniela
Schmitt, Manfred
Sweep, Fred
von Minckwitz, Gunter
Martin, Pierre-Marie
Jaenicke, Fritz
Thomssen, Christoph
Harbeck, Nadia
author_facet Kantelhardt, Eva J
Vetter, Martina
Schmidt, Marcus
Veyret, Corinne
Augustin, Doris
Hanf, Volker
Meisner, Christoph
Paepke, Daniela
Schmitt, Manfred
Sweep, Fred
von Minckwitz, Gunter
Martin, Pierre-Marie
Jaenicke, Fritz
Thomssen, Christoph
Harbeck, Nadia
author_sort Kantelhardt, Eva J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Today, more than 70% of patients with primary node-negative breast cancer are cured by local therapy alone. Many patients receive overtreatment by adjuvant chemotherapy due to inadequate risk assessment. So far, few clinical trials have prospectively evaluated tumor biology based prognostic factors. Risk assessment by a biological algorithm including invasion factors urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) will assess up to 35-55% of node-negative patients as low-risk and thus avoid chemotherapy. In contrast, a clinical-pathological algorithm will only classify 20-40% of patients as low-risk. High-risk node-negative patients should receive chemotherapy. Anthracycline-based regimens are accepted as a standard, the additional benefit of taxanes remains an open question. METHODS/DESIGN: The international NNBC3 ("Node Negative Breast Cancer 3-Europe") trial compares biological risk assessment (UP) using invasion factors uPA/PAI-1 with a clinical-pathological algorithm (CP). In this trial, the type of risk assessment (CP or UP) was chosen upfront by each center for its patients. Fresh frozen tissue was obtained to determine uPA/PAI-1 using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Patients assessed as high-risk were stratified by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and then randomised to receive anthracycline-containing chemotherapy 5-Fluorouracil (F)/Epirubicin (E)/Cyclophosphymide (C) or an anthracycline-taxane sequence (FE(100)C*6 versus FE(100)C*3 followed by Docetaxel(100)*3). DISCUSSION: In this trial, 4,149 node-negative patients with operable breast cancer from 153 centers in Germany and France were included since 2002. Measurement of uPA/PAI-1 by ELISA was performed with standardised central quality assurance for 2,497 patients (60%) from 56 "UP"-centers. The NNBC 3-Europe trial showed that inclusion of patients into a clinical phase III trial is feasible based on biological testing of fresh frozen tumor material. In addition, 2,661 patients were classified as high-risk and thus received chemotherapy. As adjuvant chemotherapy, 1,334 high-risk patients received FE(100)C-Docetaxel(100), and 1,327 received French FE(100)C. No unexpected toxicities were observed. Chemotherapy efficacy and comparison of UP with CP will be evaluated after longer follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinical Trials.gov NCT01222052.
format Text
id pubmed-3089797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30897972011-05-08 Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel Kantelhardt, Eva J Vetter, Martina Schmidt, Marcus Veyret, Corinne Augustin, Doris Hanf, Volker Meisner, Christoph Paepke, Daniela Schmitt, Manfred Sweep, Fred von Minckwitz, Gunter Martin, Pierre-Marie Jaenicke, Fritz Thomssen, Christoph Harbeck, Nadia BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Today, more than 70% of patients with primary node-negative breast cancer are cured by local therapy alone. Many patients receive overtreatment by adjuvant chemotherapy due to inadequate risk assessment. So far, few clinical trials have prospectively evaluated tumor biology based prognostic factors. Risk assessment by a biological algorithm including invasion factors urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) will assess up to 35-55% of node-negative patients as low-risk and thus avoid chemotherapy. In contrast, a clinical-pathological algorithm will only classify 20-40% of patients as low-risk. High-risk node-negative patients should receive chemotherapy. Anthracycline-based regimens are accepted as a standard, the additional benefit of taxanes remains an open question. METHODS/DESIGN: The international NNBC3 ("Node Negative Breast Cancer 3-Europe") trial compares biological risk assessment (UP) using invasion factors uPA/PAI-1 with a clinical-pathological algorithm (CP). In this trial, the type of risk assessment (CP or UP) was chosen upfront by each center for its patients. Fresh frozen tissue was obtained to determine uPA/PAI-1 using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Patients assessed as high-risk were stratified by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and then randomised to receive anthracycline-containing chemotherapy 5-Fluorouracil (F)/Epirubicin (E)/Cyclophosphymide (C) or an anthracycline-taxane sequence (FE(100)C*6 versus FE(100)C*3 followed by Docetaxel(100)*3). DISCUSSION: In this trial, 4,149 node-negative patients with operable breast cancer from 153 centers in Germany and France were included since 2002. Measurement of uPA/PAI-1 by ELISA was performed with standardised central quality assurance for 2,497 patients (60%) from 56 "UP"-centers. The NNBC 3-Europe trial showed that inclusion of patients into a clinical phase III trial is feasible based on biological testing of fresh frozen tumor material. In addition, 2,661 patients were classified as high-risk and thus received chemotherapy. As adjuvant chemotherapy, 1,334 high-risk patients received FE(100)C-Docetaxel(100), and 1,327 received French FE(100)C. No unexpected toxicities were observed. Chemotherapy efficacy and comparison of UP with CP will be evaluated after longer follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinical Trials.gov NCT01222052. BioMed Central 2011-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3089797/ /pubmed/21496284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-140 Text en Copyright ©2011 Kantelhardt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kantelhardt, Eva J
Vetter, Martina
Schmidt, Marcus
Veyret, Corinne
Augustin, Doris
Hanf, Volker
Meisner, Christoph
Paepke, Daniela
Schmitt, Manfred
Sweep, Fred
von Minckwitz, Gunter
Martin, Pierre-Marie
Jaenicke, Fritz
Thomssen, Christoph
Harbeck, Nadia
Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel
title Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel
title_full Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel
title_fullStr Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel
title_full_unstemmed Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel
title_short Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO, GBG, EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel
title_sort prospective evaluation of prognostic factors upa/pai-1 in node-negative breast cancer: phase iii nnbc3-europe trial (ago, gbg, eortc-pbg) comparing 6 × fec versus 3 × fec/3 × docetaxel
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3089797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-140
work_keys_str_mv AT kantelhardtevaj prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT vettermartina prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT schmidtmarcus prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT veyretcorinne prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT augustindoris prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT hanfvolker prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT meisnerchristoph prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT paepkedaniela prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT schmittmanfred prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT sweepfred prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT vonminckwitzgunter prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT martinpierremarie prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT jaenickefritz prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT thomssenchristoph prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel
AT harbecknadia prospectiveevaluationofprognosticfactorsupapai1innodenegativebreastcancerphaseiiinnbc3europetrialagogbgeortcpbgcomparing6fecversus3fec3docetaxel