Cargando…
Factors predicting completion and time to publication of Cochrane reviews
BACKGROUND: Cochrane reviews are regarded as scientifically rigorous, yet a review’s time to publication can be affected by factors such as the statistical significance of the findings. When this happens, misrepresentation of the literature and subsequent inappropriate decisions may result. We aimed...
Autores principales: | Tricco, Andrea C, Moher, David, Chen, Maggie H, Daniel, Raymond |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Open Medicine Publications, Inc.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3090115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21688757 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Time to Update and Quantitative Changes in the Results of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews
por: Jaidee, Wanlop, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review(a)
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Publication of reviews synthesizing child health evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to identify factors associated with publication in Cochrane and non-Cochrane sources
por: Hartling, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2016)