Cargando…

Validation of the treatment identification strategy of the HEDIS addiction quality measures: concordance with medical record review

BACKGROUND: Strategies to accurately identify the occurrence of specific health care events in administrative data is central to many quality improvement and research efforts. Many health care quality measures have treatment identification strategies based on diagnosis and procedure codes - an appro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Alex HS, Reeder, Rachelle N, Ellerbe, Laura S, Bowe, Thomas R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3090320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21481264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-73
_version_ 1782203135594332160
author Harris, Alex HS
Reeder, Rachelle N
Ellerbe, Laura S
Bowe, Thomas R
author_facet Harris, Alex HS
Reeder, Rachelle N
Ellerbe, Laura S
Bowe, Thomas R
author_sort Harris, Alex HS
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Strategies to accurately identify the occurrence of specific health care events in administrative data is central to many quality improvement and research efforts. Many health care quality measures have treatment identification strategies based on diagnosis and procedure codes - an approach that is inexpensive and feasible but usually of unknown validity. In this study, we examined if the diagnosis/procedure code combinations used in the 2006 HEDIS Initiation and Engagement quality measures to identify instances of addiction treatment have high concordance with documentation of addiction treatment in clinical progress notes. METHODS: Four type of records were randomly sampled from VHA electronic medical data: (a) Outpatient records from a substance use disorder (SUD) specialty clinic with a HEDIS-qualified substance use disorder (SUD) diagnosis/CPT code combination (n = 700), (b) Outpatient records from a non-SUD setting with a HEDIS-qualified SUD diagnosis/CPT code combination (n = 592), (c) Specialty SUD Inpatient/residential records that included a SUD diagnosis (n = 700), and (d) Non-SUD specialty Inpatient/residential records that included a SUD diagnosis (n = 700). Clinical progress notes for the sampled records were extracted and two raters classified each as documenting or not documenting addiction treatment. Rates of concordance between the HEDIS addiction treatment identification strategy and the raters' judgments were calculated for each record type. RESULTS: Within SUD outpatient clinics and SUD inpatient specialty units, 92% and 98% of sampled records had chart evidence of addiction treatment. Of outpatient encounters with a qualifying diagnosis/procedure code combination outside of SUD clinics, 63% had chart evidence of addiction treatment. Within non-SUD specialty inpatient units, only 46% of sampled records had chart evidence of addiction treatment. CONCLUSIONS: For records generated in SUD specialty settings, the HEDIS strategy of identifying SUD treatment with diagnosis and procedure codes has a high concordance with chart review. The concordance rate outside of SUD specialty settings is much lower and highly variable between facilities. Therefore, some patients may be counted as meeting the 2006 HEDIS Initiation and Engagement criteria without having received the specified amount (or any) addiction treatment.
format Text
id pubmed-3090320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30903202011-05-10 Validation of the treatment identification strategy of the HEDIS addiction quality measures: concordance with medical record review Harris, Alex HS Reeder, Rachelle N Ellerbe, Laura S Bowe, Thomas R BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Strategies to accurately identify the occurrence of specific health care events in administrative data is central to many quality improvement and research efforts. Many health care quality measures have treatment identification strategies based on diagnosis and procedure codes - an approach that is inexpensive and feasible but usually of unknown validity. In this study, we examined if the diagnosis/procedure code combinations used in the 2006 HEDIS Initiation and Engagement quality measures to identify instances of addiction treatment have high concordance with documentation of addiction treatment in clinical progress notes. METHODS: Four type of records were randomly sampled from VHA electronic medical data: (a) Outpatient records from a substance use disorder (SUD) specialty clinic with a HEDIS-qualified substance use disorder (SUD) diagnosis/CPT code combination (n = 700), (b) Outpatient records from a non-SUD setting with a HEDIS-qualified SUD diagnosis/CPT code combination (n = 592), (c) Specialty SUD Inpatient/residential records that included a SUD diagnosis (n = 700), and (d) Non-SUD specialty Inpatient/residential records that included a SUD diagnosis (n = 700). Clinical progress notes for the sampled records were extracted and two raters classified each as documenting or not documenting addiction treatment. Rates of concordance between the HEDIS addiction treatment identification strategy and the raters' judgments were calculated for each record type. RESULTS: Within SUD outpatient clinics and SUD inpatient specialty units, 92% and 98% of sampled records had chart evidence of addiction treatment. Of outpatient encounters with a qualifying diagnosis/procedure code combination outside of SUD clinics, 63% had chart evidence of addiction treatment. Within non-SUD specialty inpatient units, only 46% of sampled records had chart evidence of addiction treatment. CONCLUSIONS: For records generated in SUD specialty settings, the HEDIS strategy of identifying SUD treatment with diagnosis and procedure codes has a high concordance with chart review. The concordance rate outside of SUD specialty settings is much lower and highly variable between facilities. Therefore, some patients may be counted as meeting the 2006 HEDIS Initiation and Engagement criteria without having received the specified amount (or any) addiction treatment. BioMed Central 2011-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3090320/ /pubmed/21481264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-73 Text en Copyright ©2011 Harris et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harris, Alex HS
Reeder, Rachelle N
Ellerbe, Laura S
Bowe, Thomas R
Validation of the treatment identification strategy of the HEDIS addiction quality measures: concordance with medical record review
title Validation of the treatment identification strategy of the HEDIS addiction quality measures: concordance with medical record review
title_full Validation of the treatment identification strategy of the HEDIS addiction quality measures: concordance with medical record review
title_fullStr Validation of the treatment identification strategy of the HEDIS addiction quality measures: concordance with medical record review
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the treatment identification strategy of the HEDIS addiction quality measures: concordance with medical record review
title_short Validation of the treatment identification strategy of the HEDIS addiction quality measures: concordance with medical record review
title_sort validation of the treatment identification strategy of the hedis addiction quality measures: concordance with medical record review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3090320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21481264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-73
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisalexhs validationofthetreatmentidentificationstrategyofthehedisaddictionqualitymeasuresconcordancewithmedicalrecordreview
AT reederrachellen validationofthetreatmentidentificationstrategyofthehedisaddictionqualitymeasuresconcordancewithmedicalrecordreview
AT ellerbelauras validationofthetreatmentidentificationstrategyofthehedisaddictionqualitymeasuresconcordancewithmedicalrecordreview
AT bowethomasr validationofthetreatmentidentificationstrategyofthehedisaddictionqualitymeasuresconcordancewithmedicalrecordreview