Cargando…

An assessment of mental health policy in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of the countries in the African Region had a mental health policy by 2005, but little is known about quality of mental health policies in Africa and globally. This paper reports the results of an assessment of the mental health policies of Ghana, South Africa, Uganda a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faydi, Edwige, Funk, Michelle, Kleintjes, Sharon, Ofori-Atta, Angela, Ssbunnya, Joshua, Mwanza, Jason, Kim, Caroline, Flisher, Alan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3090369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21477285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-9-17
_version_ 1782203146800463872
author Faydi, Edwige
Funk, Michelle
Kleintjes, Sharon
Ofori-Atta, Angela
Ssbunnya, Joshua
Mwanza, Jason
Kim, Caroline
Flisher, Alan
author_facet Faydi, Edwige
Funk, Michelle
Kleintjes, Sharon
Ofori-Atta, Angela
Ssbunnya, Joshua
Mwanza, Jason
Kim, Caroline
Flisher, Alan
author_sort Faydi, Edwige
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately half of the countries in the African Region had a mental health policy by 2005, but little is known about quality of mental health policies in Africa and globally. This paper reports the results of an assessment of the mental health policies of Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia. METHODS: The WHO Mental Health Policy Checklist was used to evaluate the most current mental health policy in each country. Assessments were completed and reviewed by a specially constituted national committee as well as an independent WHO team. Results of each country evaluation were discussed until consensus was reached. RESULTS: All four policies received a high level mandate. Each policy addressed community-based services, the integration of mental health into general health care, promotion of mental health and rehabilitation. Prevention was addressed in the South African and Ugandan policies only. Use of evidence for policy development varied considerably. Consultations were mainly held with the mental health sector. Only the Zambian policy presented a clear vision, while three of four countries spelt out values and principles, the need to establish a coordinating body for mental health, and to protect the human rights of people with mental health problems. None included all the basic elements of a policy, nor specified sources and levels of funding for implementation. Deinstitutionalisation and the provision of essential psychotropic medicines were insufficiently addressed. Advocacy, empowerment of users and families and intersectoral collaboration were inadequately addressed. Only Uganda sufficiently outlined a mental health information system, research and evaluation, while only Ghana comprehensively addressed human resources and training requirements. No country had an accompanying strategic mental health plan to allow the development and implementation of concrete strategies and activities. CONCLUSIONS: Six gaps which could impact on the policies' effect on countries' mental health systems were: lack of internal consistency of structure and content of policies, superficiality of key international concepts, lack of evidence on which to base policy directions, inadequate political support, poor integration of mental health policies within the overall national policy and legislative framework, and lack of financial specificity. Three strategies to address these concerns emerged, namely strengthening capacity of key stakeholders in public (mental) health and policy development, creation of a culture of inclusive and dynamic policy development, and coordinated action to optimize use of available resources.
format Text
id pubmed-3090369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30903692011-05-10 An assessment of mental health policy in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia Faydi, Edwige Funk, Michelle Kleintjes, Sharon Ofori-Atta, Angela Ssbunnya, Joshua Mwanza, Jason Kim, Caroline Flisher, Alan Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Approximately half of the countries in the African Region had a mental health policy by 2005, but little is known about quality of mental health policies in Africa and globally. This paper reports the results of an assessment of the mental health policies of Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia. METHODS: The WHO Mental Health Policy Checklist was used to evaluate the most current mental health policy in each country. Assessments were completed and reviewed by a specially constituted national committee as well as an independent WHO team. Results of each country evaluation were discussed until consensus was reached. RESULTS: All four policies received a high level mandate. Each policy addressed community-based services, the integration of mental health into general health care, promotion of mental health and rehabilitation. Prevention was addressed in the South African and Ugandan policies only. Use of evidence for policy development varied considerably. Consultations were mainly held with the mental health sector. Only the Zambian policy presented a clear vision, while three of four countries spelt out values and principles, the need to establish a coordinating body for mental health, and to protect the human rights of people with mental health problems. None included all the basic elements of a policy, nor specified sources and levels of funding for implementation. Deinstitutionalisation and the provision of essential psychotropic medicines were insufficiently addressed. Advocacy, empowerment of users and families and intersectoral collaboration were inadequately addressed. Only Uganda sufficiently outlined a mental health information system, research and evaluation, while only Ghana comprehensively addressed human resources and training requirements. No country had an accompanying strategic mental health plan to allow the development and implementation of concrete strategies and activities. CONCLUSIONS: Six gaps which could impact on the policies' effect on countries' mental health systems were: lack of internal consistency of structure and content of policies, superficiality of key international concepts, lack of evidence on which to base policy directions, inadequate political support, poor integration of mental health policies within the overall national policy and legislative framework, and lack of financial specificity. Three strategies to address these concerns emerged, namely strengthening capacity of key stakeholders in public (mental) health and policy development, creation of a culture of inclusive and dynamic policy development, and coordinated action to optimize use of available resources. BioMed Central 2011-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3090369/ /pubmed/21477285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-9-17 Text en Copyright ©2011 Faydi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Faydi, Edwige
Funk, Michelle
Kleintjes, Sharon
Ofori-Atta, Angela
Ssbunnya, Joshua
Mwanza, Jason
Kim, Caroline
Flisher, Alan
An assessment of mental health policy in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia
title An assessment of mental health policy in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia
title_full An assessment of mental health policy in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia
title_fullStr An assessment of mental health policy in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of mental health policy in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia
title_short An assessment of mental health policy in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia
title_sort assessment of mental health policy in ghana, south africa, uganda and zambia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3090369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21477285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-9-17
work_keys_str_mv AT faydiedwige anassessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT funkmichelle anassessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT kleintjessharon anassessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT oforiattaangela anassessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT ssbunnyajoshua anassessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT mwanzajason anassessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT kimcaroline anassessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT flisheralan anassessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT faydiedwige assessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT funkmichelle assessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT kleintjessharon assessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT oforiattaangela assessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT ssbunnyajoshua assessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT mwanzajason assessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT kimcaroline assessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia
AT flisheralan assessmentofmentalhealthpolicyinghanasouthafricaugandaandzambia