Cargando…
Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus
BACKGROUND: Flexible genomes facilitate bacterial evolution and are classically organized into polymorphic strain-specific segments called regions of genomic plasticity (RGPs). Using a new web tool, RGPFinder, we investigated plasticity units in bacterial genomes, by exhaustive description of the RG...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3091717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20950463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-568 |
_version_ | 1782203311292678144 |
---|---|
author | Ogier, Jean-Claude Calteau, Alexandra Forst, Steve Goodrich-Blair, Heidi Roche, David Rouy, Zoé Suen, Garret Zumbihl, Robert Givaudan, Alain Tailliez, Patrick Médigue, Claudine Gaudriault, Sophie |
author_facet | Ogier, Jean-Claude Calteau, Alexandra Forst, Steve Goodrich-Blair, Heidi Roche, David Rouy, Zoé Suen, Garret Zumbihl, Robert Givaudan, Alain Tailliez, Patrick Médigue, Claudine Gaudriault, Sophie |
author_sort | Ogier, Jean-Claude |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Flexible genomes facilitate bacterial evolution and are classically organized into polymorphic strain-specific segments called regions of genomic plasticity (RGPs). Using a new web tool, RGPFinder, we investigated plasticity units in bacterial genomes, by exhaustive description of the RGPs in two Photorhabdus and two Xenorhabdus strains, belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae and interacting with invertebrates (insects and nematodes). RESULTS: RGPs account for about 60% of the genome in each of the four genomes studied. We classified RGPs into genomic islands (GIs), prophages and two new classes of RGP without the features of classical mobile genetic elements (MGEs) but harboring genes encoding enzymes catalyzing DNA recombination (RGP(mob)), or with no remarkable feature (RGP(none)). These new classes accounted for most of the RGPs and are probably hypervariable regions, ancient MGEs with degraded mobilization machinery or non canonical MGEs for which the mobility mechanism has yet to be described. We provide evidence that not only the GIs and the prophages, but also RGP(mob )and RGP(none), have a mosaic structure consisting of modules. A module is a block of genes, 0.5 to 60 kb in length, displaying a conserved genomic organization among the different Enterobacteriaceae. Modules are functional units involved in host/environment interactions (22-31%), metabolism (22-27%), intracellular or intercellular DNA mobility (13-30%), drug resistance (4-5%) and antibiotic synthesis (3-6%). Finally, in silico comparisons and PCR multiplex analysis indicated that these modules served as plasticity units within the bacterial genome during genome speciation and as deletion units in clonal variants of Photorhabdus. CONCLUSIONS: This led us to consider the modules, rather than the entire RGP, as the true unit of plasticity in bacterial genomes, during both short-term and long-term genome evolution. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3091717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30917172011-05-11 Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus Ogier, Jean-Claude Calteau, Alexandra Forst, Steve Goodrich-Blair, Heidi Roche, David Rouy, Zoé Suen, Garret Zumbihl, Robert Givaudan, Alain Tailliez, Patrick Médigue, Claudine Gaudriault, Sophie BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Flexible genomes facilitate bacterial evolution and are classically organized into polymorphic strain-specific segments called regions of genomic plasticity (RGPs). Using a new web tool, RGPFinder, we investigated plasticity units in bacterial genomes, by exhaustive description of the RGPs in two Photorhabdus and two Xenorhabdus strains, belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae and interacting with invertebrates (insects and nematodes). RESULTS: RGPs account for about 60% of the genome in each of the four genomes studied. We classified RGPs into genomic islands (GIs), prophages and two new classes of RGP without the features of classical mobile genetic elements (MGEs) but harboring genes encoding enzymes catalyzing DNA recombination (RGP(mob)), or with no remarkable feature (RGP(none)). These new classes accounted for most of the RGPs and are probably hypervariable regions, ancient MGEs with degraded mobilization machinery or non canonical MGEs for which the mobility mechanism has yet to be described. We provide evidence that not only the GIs and the prophages, but also RGP(mob )and RGP(none), have a mosaic structure consisting of modules. A module is a block of genes, 0.5 to 60 kb in length, displaying a conserved genomic organization among the different Enterobacteriaceae. Modules are functional units involved in host/environment interactions (22-31%), metabolism (22-27%), intracellular or intercellular DNA mobility (13-30%), drug resistance (4-5%) and antibiotic synthesis (3-6%). Finally, in silico comparisons and PCR multiplex analysis indicated that these modules served as plasticity units within the bacterial genome during genome speciation and as deletion units in clonal variants of Photorhabdus. CONCLUSIONS: This led us to consider the modules, rather than the entire RGP, as the true unit of plasticity in bacterial genomes, during both short-term and long-term genome evolution. BioMed Central 2010-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3091717/ /pubmed/20950463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-568 Text en Copyright ©2010 Ogier et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ogier, Jean-Claude Calteau, Alexandra Forst, Steve Goodrich-Blair, Heidi Roche, David Rouy, Zoé Suen, Garret Zumbihl, Robert Givaudan, Alain Tailliez, Patrick Médigue, Claudine Gaudriault, Sophie Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus |
title | Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus |
title_full | Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus |
title_fullStr | Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus |
title_full_unstemmed | Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus |
title_short | Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus |
title_sort | units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, photorhabdus and xenorhabdus |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3091717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20950463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-568 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogierjeanclaude unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus AT calteaualexandra unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus AT forststeve unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus AT goodrichblairheidi unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus AT rochedavid unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus AT rouyzoe unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus AT suengarret unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus AT zumbihlrobert unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus AT givaudanalain unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus AT tailliezpatrick unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus AT medigueclaudine unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus AT gaudriaultsophie unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus |