Cargando…

Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus

BACKGROUND: Flexible genomes facilitate bacterial evolution and are classically organized into polymorphic strain-specific segments called regions of genomic plasticity (RGPs). Using a new web tool, RGPFinder, we investigated plasticity units in bacterial genomes, by exhaustive description of the RG...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogier, Jean-Claude, Calteau, Alexandra, Forst, Steve, Goodrich-Blair, Heidi, Roche, David, Rouy, Zoé, Suen, Garret, Zumbihl, Robert, Givaudan, Alain, Tailliez, Patrick, Médigue, Claudine, Gaudriault, Sophie
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3091717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20950463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-568
_version_ 1782203311292678144
author Ogier, Jean-Claude
Calteau, Alexandra
Forst, Steve
Goodrich-Blair, Heidi
Roche, David
Rouy, Zoé
Suen, Garret
Zumbihl, Robert
Givaudan, Alain
Tailliez, Patrick
Médigue, Claudine
Gaudriault, Sophie
author_facet Ogier, Jean-Claude
Calteau, Alexandra
Forst, Steve
Goodrich-Blair, Heidi
Roche, David
Rouy, Zoé
Suen, Garret
Zumbihl, Robert
Givaudan, Alain
Tailliez, Patrick
Médigue, Claudine
Gaudriault, Sophie
author_sort Ogier, Jean-Claude
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Flexible genomes facilitate bacterial evolution and are classically organized into polymorphic strain-specific segments called regions of genomic plasticity (RGPs). Using a new web tool, RGPFinder, we investigated plasticity units in bacterial genomes, by exhaustive description of the RGPs in two Photorhabdus and two Xenorhabdus strains, belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae and interacting with invertebrates (insects and nematodes). RESULTS: RGPs account for about 60% of the genome in each of the four genomes studied. We classified RGPs into genomic islands (GIs), prophages and two new classes of RGP without the features of classical mobile genetic elements (MGEs) but harboring genes encoding enzymes catalyzing DNA recombination (RGP(mob)), or with no remarkable feature (RGP(none)). These new classes accounted for most of the RGPs and are probably hypervariable regions, ancient MGEs with degraded mobilization machinery or non canonical MGEs for which the mobility mechanism has yet to be described. We provide evidence that not only the GIs and the prophages, but also RGP(mob )and RGP(none), have a mosaic structure consisting of modules. A module is a block of genes, 0.5 to 60 kb in length, displaying a conserved genomic organization among the different Enterobacteriaceae. Modules are functional units involved in host/environment interactions (22-31%), metabolism (22-27%), intracellular or intercellular DNA mobility (13-30%), drug resistance (4-5%) and antibiotic synthesis (3-6%). Finally, in silico comparisons and PCR multiplex analysis indicated that these modules served as plasticity units within the bacterial genome during genome speciation and as deletion units in clonal variants of Photorhabdus. CONCLUSIONS: This led us to consider the modules, rather than the entire RGP, as the true unit of plasticity in bacterial genomes, during both short-term and long-term genome evolution.
format Text
id pubmed-3091717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30917172011-05-11 Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus Ogier, Jean-Claude Calteau, Alexandra Forst, Steve Goodrich-Blair, Heidi Roche, David Rouy, Zoé Suen, Garret Zumbihl, Robert Givaudan, Alain Tailliez, Patrick Médigue, Claudine Gaudriault, Sophie BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Flexible genomes facilitate bacterial evolution and are classically organized into polymorphic strain-specific segments called regions of genomic plasticity (RGPs). Using a new web tool, RGPFinder, we investigated plasticity units in bacterial genomes, by exhaustive description of the RGPs in two Photorhabdus and two Xenorhabdus strains, belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae and interacting with invertebrates (insects and nematodes). RESULTS: RGPs account for about 60% of the genome in each of the four genomes studied. We classified RGPs into genomic islands (GIs), prophages and two new classes of RGP without the features of classical mobile genetic elements (MGEs) but harboring genes encoding enzymes catalyzing DNA recombination (RGP(mob)), or with no remarkable feature (RGP(none)). These new classes accounted for most of the RGPs and are probably hypervariable regions, ancient MGEs with degraded mobilization machinery or non canonical MGEs for which the mobility mechanism has yet to be described. We provide evidence that not only the GIs and the prophages, but also RGP(mob )and RGP(none), have a mosaic structure consisting of modules. A module is a block of genes, 0.5 to 60 kb in length, displaying a conserved genomic organization among the different Enterobacteriaceae. Modules are functional units involved in host/environment interactions (22-31%), metabolism (22-27%), intracellular or intercellular DNA mobility (13-30%), drug resistance (4-5%) and antibiotic synthesis (3-6%). Finally, in silico comparisons and PCR multiplex analysis indicated that these modules served as plasticity units within the bacterial genome during genome speciation and as deletion units in clonal variants of Photorhabdus. CONCLUSIONS: This led us to consider the modules, rather than the entire RGP, as the true unit of plasticity in bacterial genomes, during both short-term and long-term genome evolution. BioMed Central 2010-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3091717/ /pubmed/20950463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-568 Text en Copyright ©2010 Ogier et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ogier, Jean-Claude
Calteau, Alexandra
Forst, Steve
Goodrich-Blair, Heidi
Roche, David
Rouy, Zoé
Suen, Garret
Zumbihl, Robert
Givaudan, Alain
Tailliez, Patrick
Médigue, Claudine
Gaudriault, Sophie
Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus
title Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus
title_full Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus
title_fullStr Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus
title_full_unstemmed Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus
title_short Units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus
title_sort units of plasticity in bacterial genomes: new insight from the comparative genomics of two bacteria interacting with invertebrates, photorhabdus and xenorhabdus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3091717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20950463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-568
work_keys_str_mv AT ogierjeanclaude unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus
AT calteaualexandra unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus
AT forststeve unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus
AT goodrichblairheidi unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus
AT rochedavid unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus
AT rouyzoe unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus
AT suengarret unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus
AT zumbihlrobert unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus
AT givaudanalain unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus
AT tailliezpatrick unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus
AT medigueclaudine unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus
AT gaudriaultsophie unitsofplasticityinbacterialgenomesnewinsightfromthecomparativegenomicsoftwobacteriainteractingwithinvertebratesphotorhabdusandxenorhabdus