Cargando…

The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle

SUMMARY: Hyperkyphosis is implicated in a mounting list of negative outcomes, including higher mortality. Hyperkyphosis research is hindered due to difficulties inherent in its measurement. By showing that three clinical measures of kyphosis are suitable for use in large scale, longitudinal, hyperky...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greendale, G. A., Nili, N. S., Huang, M.-H., Seeger, L., Karlamangla, A. S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3092935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20938766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1422-z
_version_ 1782203412998258688
author Greendale, G. A.
Nili, N. S.
Huang, M.-H.
Seeger, L.
Karlamangla, A. S.
author_facet Greendale, G. A.
Nili, N. S.
Huang, M.-H.
Seeger, L.
Karlamangla, A. S.
author_sort Greendale, G. A.
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: Hyperkyphosis is implicated in a mounting list of negative outcomes, including higher mortality. Hyperkyphosis research is hindered due to difficulties inherent in its measurement. By showing that three clinical measures of kyphosis are suitable for use in large scale, longitudinal, hyperkyphosis studies, we will facilitate much needed research in this field. INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to describe the reliability of three non-radiological kyphosis measures (Debrunner kyphosis angle, flexicurve kyphosis index, and flexicurve kyphosis angle) and their validity compared to the Cobb angle and to approximate a Cobb angle from non-radiological kyphosis measures. METHODS: We analyzed data from 113 participants aged ≥60 years with kyphosis angle ≥40°. Cobb angle was measured on a standing lateral thoracolumbar radiograph using bounds at T4 and T12. Non-radiological measures of kyphosis were made three times by a single rater and a 4th time by a blinded second rater. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities for non-radiological assessments were high (intra-class correlations of 0.96 to 0.98) and did not differ from each other. Pearson correlations, estimating validity, ranged from 0.62 to 0.69 and did not differ. The Debrunner angle was close to the Cobb angle, with scaling factor of 1.067 and an offset of 5°. The Flexicurve kyphosis angle had to be scaled by 1.53 to obtain the equivalent Cobb angle. The scaling factor for the Flexicurve kyphosis index to Cobb angle was 315, with an offset of 5°. Compared to the measured Cobb angle, Cobb angles predicted using the non-radiological measures had similar magnitude errors (standard deviations of the differences ranging between 10.24 and 11.26). CONCLUSIONS: Each non-radiological measurement had similar reliability and validity. Low cost, ease of use, and robustness to variations in spine contour argue for the Flexicurve in longitudinal kyphosis assessments. The approximate conversion factors provided will permit translation of non-radiological measures to Cobb angles.
format Text
id pubmed-3092935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30929352011-06-07 The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle Greendale, G. A. Nili, N. S. Huang, M.-H. Seeger, L. Karlamangla, A. S. Osteoporos Int Original Article SUMMARY: Hyperkyphosis is implicated in a mounting list of negative outcomes, including higher mortality. Hyperkyphosis research is hindered due to difficulties inherent in its measurement. By showing that three clinical measures of kyphosis are suitable for use in large scale, longitudinal, hyperkyphosis studies, we will facilitate much needed research in this field. INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to describe the reliability of three non-radiological kyphosis measures (Debrunner kyphosis angle, flexicurve kyphosis index, and flexicurve kyphosis angle) and their validity compared to the Cobb angle and to approximate a Cobb angle from non-radiological kyphosis measures. METHODS: We analyzed data from 113 participants aged ≥60 years with kyphosis angle ≥40°. Cobb angle was measured on a standing lateral thoracolumbar radiograph using bounds at T4 and T12. Non-radiological measures of kyphosis were made three times by a single rater and a 4th time by a blinded second rater. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities for non-radiological assessments were high (intra-class correlations of 0.96 to 0.98) and did not differ from each other. Pearson correlations, estimating validity, ranged from 0.62 to 0.69 and did not differ. The Debrunner angle was close to the Cobb angle, with scaling factor of 1.067 and an offset of 5°. The Flexicurve kyphosis angle had to be scaled by 1.53 to obtain the equivalent Cobb angle. The scaling factor for the Flexicurve kyphosis index to Cobb angle was 315, with an offset of 5°. Compared to the measured Cobb angle, Cobb angles predicted using the non-radiological measures had similar magnitude errors (standard deviations of the differences ranging between 10.24 and 11.26). CONCLUSIONS: Each non-radiological measurement had similar reliability and validity. Low cost, ease of use, and robustness to variations in spine contour argue for the Flexicurve in longitudinal kyphosis assessments. The approximate conversion factors provided will permit translation of non-radiological measures to Cobb angles. Springer-Verlag 2010-10-12 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3092935/ /pubmed/20938766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1422-z Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Greendale, G. A.
Nili, N. S.
Huang, M.-H.
Seeger, L.
Karlamangla, A. S.
The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle
title The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle
title_full The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle
title_fullStr The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle
title_full_unstemmed The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle
title_short The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle
title_sort reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological cobb angle
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3092935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20938766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1422-z
work_keys_str_mv AT greendalega thereliabilityandvalidityofthreenonradiologicalmeasuresofthoracickyphosisandtheirrelationstothestandingradiologicalcobbangle
AT nilins thereliabilityandvalidityofthreenonradiologicalmeasuresofthoracickyphosisandtheirrelationstothestandingradiologicalcobbangle
AT huangmh thereliabilityandvalidityofthreenonradiologicalmeasuresofthoracickyphosisandtheirrelationstothestandingradiologicalcobbangle
AT seegerl thereliabilityandvalidityofthreenonradiologicalmeasuresofthoracickyphosisandtheirrelationstothestandingradiologicalcobbangle
AT karlamanglaas thereliabilityandvalidityofthreenonradiologicalmeasuresofthoracickyphosisandtheirrelationstothestandingradiologicalcobbangle
AT greendalega reliabilityandvalidityofthreenonradiologicalmeasuresofthoracickyphosisandtheirrelationstothestandingradiologicalcobbangle
AT nilins reliabilityandvalidityofthreenonradiologicalmeasuresofthoracickyphosisandtheirrelationstothestandingradiologicalcobbangle
AT huangmh reliabilityandvalidityofthreenonradiologicalmeasuresofthoracickyphosisandtheirrelationstothestandingradiologicalcobbangle
AT seegerl reliabilityandvalidityofthreenonradiologicalmeasuresofthoracickyphosisandtheirrelationstothestandingradiologicalcobbangle
AT karlamanglaas reliabilityandvalidityofthreenonradiologicalmeasuresofthoracickyphosisandtheirrelationstothestandingradiologicalcobbangle