Cargando…
Earthquake-related pelvic crush fracture vs. non-earthquake fracture on digital radiography and MDCT: a comparative study
OBJECTIVE: To determine the features of earthquake-related pelvic crush fractures versus non-earthquake fractures with digital radiography and multidetector row computed tomography. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-seven survivors with pelvic crush fractures in the 2008 Sichuan earthquake were entered...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3093794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21655758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000400018 |
_version_ | 1782203499084251136 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Tian-wu Yang, Zhi-gang Dong, Zhi-hui Tang, Si-shi Chu, Zhi-gang Shao, Heng |
author_facet | Chen, Tian-wu Yang, Zhi-gang Dong, Zhi-hui Tang, Si-shi Chu, Zhi-gang Shao, Heng |
author_sort | Chen, Tian-wu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the features of earthquake-related pelvic crush fractures versus non-earthquake fractures with digital radiography and multidetector row computed tomography. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-seven survivors with pelvic crush fractures in the 2008 Sichuan earthquake were entered in our study as the earthquake-related group (139 underwent digital radiography, 28 underwent multidetector row computed tomography); 70 victims with non-earthquake pelvic fractures were enrolled into this study as the non-earthquake group (54 underwent digital radiography, 16 underwent multidetector row computed tomography). Data were reviewed retrospectively between groups, focusing on anatomic distributions, status of pelvic bone fractures, numbers of pelvic bones involved, and classification of pelvic ring fractures according to the Tile classification system. RESULTS: Pelvic fractures occurred more frequently in the pubis in the earthquake-related group than in the non-earthquake group (135/167, 81% vs. 48/70, 69%). In addition, comminuted fractures were more common in the earthquake-related group than in the non-earthquake group (55/167, 33% vs. 10/70, 14%). Multiple fractures were less common in the earthquake-related group than in the non-earthquake group (81/167, 49% vs. 46/70, 66%). Regarding the classification of pelvic ring fractures, Type C predominantly composed of subtype C3 occurred more frequently (64/167, 38% vs. 12/70, 17%), and Type A was less common in the earthquake-related group than in the non-earthquake group (31/167, 19% vs. 23/70, 32%). All differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). No difference was found in Type B fractures between the groups (72/167, 43% vs. 35/70, 50%). CONCLUSION: Earthquake-related pelvic crush fractures can be characterized by a high incidence of pelvic fractures occurring in the pubis, comminuted fractures, and Type C fractures predominantly composed by subtype C3, despite a low incidence of multiple fractures. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3093794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30937942011-05-17 Earthquake-related pelvic crush fracture vs. non-earthquake fracture on digital radiography and MDCT: a comparative study Chen, Tian-wu Yang, Zhi-gang Dong, Zhi-hui Tang, Si-shi Chu, Zhi-gang Shao, Heng Clinics (Sao Paulo) Clinical Science OBJECTIVE: To determine the features of earthquake-related pelvic crush fractures versus non-earthquake fractures with digital radiography and multidetector row computed tomography. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-seven survivors with pelvic crush fractures in the 2008 Sichuan earthquake were entered in our study as the earthquake-related group (139 underwent digital radiography, 28 underwent multidetector row computed tomography); 70 victims with non-earthquake pelvic fractures were enrolled into this study as the non-earthquake group (54 underwent digital radiography, 16 underwent multidetector row computed tomography). Data were reviewed retrospectively between groups, focusing on anatomic distributions, status of pelvic bone fractures, numbers of pelvic bones involved, and classification of pelvic ring fractures according to the Tile classification system. RESULTS: Pelvic fractures occurred more frequently in the pubis in the earthquake-related group than in the non-earthquake group (135/167, 81% vs. 48/70, 69%). In addition, comminuted fractures were more common in the earthquake-related group than in the non-earthquake group (55/167, 33% vs. 10/70, 14%). Multiple fractures were less common in the earthquake-related group than in the non-earthquake group (81/167, 49% vs. 46/70, 66%). Regarding the classification of pelvic ring fractures, Type C predominantly composed of subtype C3 occurred more frequently (64/167, 38% vs. 12/70, 17%), and Type A was less common in the earthquake-related group than in the non-earthquake group (31/167, 19% vs. 23/70, 32%). All differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). No difference was found in Type B fractures between the groups (72/167, 43% vs. 35/70, 50%). CONCLUSION: Earthquake-related pelvic crush fractures can be characterized by a high incidence of pelvic fractures occurring in the pubis, comminuted fractures, and Type C fractures predominantly composed by subtype C3, despite a low incidence of multiple fractures. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2011-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3093794/ /pubmed/21655758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000400018 Text en Copyright © 2011 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Chen, Tian-wu Yang, Zhi-gang Dong, Zhi-hui Tang, Si-shi Chu, Zhi-gang Shao, Heng Earthquake-related pelvic crush fracture vs. non-earthquake fracture on digital radiography and MDCT: a comparative study |
title | Earthquake-related pelvic crush fracture vs. non-earthquake fracture on digital radiography and MDCT: a comparative study |
title_full | Earthquake-related pelvic crush fracture vs. non-earthquake fracture on digital radiography and MDCT: a comparative study |
title_fullStr | Earthquake-related pelvic crush fracture vs. non-earthquake fracture on digital radiography and MDCT: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Earthquake-related pelvic crush fracture vs. non-earthquake fracture on digital radiography and MDCT: a comparative study |
title_short | Earthquake-related pelvic crush fracture vs. non-earthquake fracture on digital radiography and MDCT: a comparative study |
title_sort | earthquake-related pelvic crush fracture vs. non-earthquake fracture on digital radiography and mdct: a comparative study |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3093794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21655758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000400018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chentianwu earthquakerelatedpelviccrushfracturevsnonearthquakefractureondigitalradiographyandmdctacomparativestudy AT yangzhigang earthquakerelatedpelviccrushfracturevsnonearthquakefractureondigitalradiographyandmdctacomparativestudy AT dongzhihui earthquakerelatedpelviccrushfracturevsnonearthquakefractureondigitalradiographyandmdctacomparativestudy AT tangsishi earthquakerelatedpelviccrushfracturevsnonearthquakefractureondigitalradiographyandmdctacomparativestudy AT chuzhigang earthquakerelatedpelviccrushfracturevsnonearthquakefractureondigitalradiographyandmdctacomparativestudy AT shaoheng earthquakerelatedpelviccrushfracturevsnonearthquakefractureondigitalradiographyandmdctacomparativestudy |