Cargando…

Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3)

BACKGROUND: Gene expression is regulated through a complex interplay of different transcription factors (TFs) which can enhance or inhibit gene transcription. ArcA is a global regulator that regulates genes involved in different metabolic pathways, while IclR as a local regulator, controls the trans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waegeman, Hendrik, Beauprez, Joeri, Moens, Helena, Maertens, Jo, De Mey, Marjan, Foulquié-Moreno, Maria R, Heijnen, Joseph J, Charlier, Daniel, Soetaert, Wim
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21481254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-70
_version_ 1782203514598981632
author Waegeman, Hendrik
Beauprez, Joeri
Moens, Helena
Maertens, Jo
De Mey, Marjan
Foulquié-Moreno, Maria R
Heijnen, Joseph J
Charlier, Daniel
Soetaert, Wim
author_facet Waegeman, Hendrik
Beauprez, Joeri
Moens, Helena
Maertens, Jo
De Mey, Marjan
Foulquié-Moreno, Maria R
Heijnen, Joseph J
Charlier, Daniel
Soetaert, Wim
author_sort Waegeman, Hendrik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gene expression is regulated through a complex interplay of different transcription factors (TFs) which can enhance or inhibit gene transcription. ArcA is a global regulator that regulates genes involved in different metabolic pathways, while IclR as a local regulator, controls the transcription of the glyoxylate pathway genes of the aceBAK operon. This study investigates the physiological and metabolic consequences of arcA and iclR deletions on E. coli K12 MG1655 under glucose abundant and limiting conditions and compares the results with the metabolic characteristics of E. coli BL21 (DE3). RESULTS: The deletion of arcA and iclR results in an increase in the biomass yield both under glucose abundant and limiting conditions, approaching the maximum theoretical yield of 0.65 c-mole/c-mole glucose under glucose abundant conditions. This can be explained by the lower flux through several CO(2 )producing pathways in the E. coli K12 ΔarcAΔiclR double knockout strain. Due to iclR gene deletion, the glyoxylate pathway is activated resulting in a redirection of 30% of the isocitrate molecules directly to succinate and malate without CO(2 )production. Furthermore, a higher flux at the entrance of the TCA was noticed due to arcA gene deletion, resulting in a reduced production of acetate and less carbon loss. Under glucose limiting conditions the flux through the glyoxylate pathway is further increased in the ΔiclR knockout strain, but this effect was not observed in the double knockout strain. Also a striking correlation between the glyoxylate flux data and the isocitrate lyase activity was observed for almost all strains and under both growth conditions, illustrating the transcriptional control of this pathway. Finally, similar central metabolic fluxes were observed in E. coli K12 ΔarcA ΔiclR compared to the industrially relevant E. coli BL21 (DE3), especially with respect to the pentose pathway, the glyoxylate pathway, and the TCA fluxes. In addition, a comparison of the genome sequences of the two strains showed that BL21 possesses two mutations in the promoter region of iclR and rare codons are present in arcA implying a lower tRNA acceptance. Both phenomena presumably result in a reduced ArcA and IclR synthesis in BL21, which contributes to the similar physiology as observed in E. coli K12 ΔarcAΔiclR. CONCLUSIONS: The deletion of arcA results in a decrease of repression on transcription of TCA cycle genes under glucose abundant conditions, without significantly affecting the glyoxylate pathway activity. IclR clearly represses transcription of glyoxylate pathway genes under glucose abundance, a condition in which Crp activation is absent. Under glucose limitation, Crp is responsible for the high glyoxylate flux, but IclR still represses transcription. Finally, in E. coli BL21 (DE3), ArcA and IclR are poorly expressed, explaining the similar fluxes observed compared to the ΔarcAΔiclR strain.
format Text
id pubmed-3094197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30941972011-05-14 Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) Waegeman, Hendrik Beauprez, Joeri Moens, Helena Maertens, Jo De Mey, Marjan Foulquié-Moreno, Maria R Heijnen, Joseph J Charlier, Daniel Soetaert, Wim BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Gene expression is regulated through a complex interplay of different transcription factors (TFs) which can enhance or inhibit gene transcription. ArcA is a global regulator that regulates genes involved in different metabolic pathways, while IclR as a local regulator, controls the transcription of the glyoxylate pathway genes of the aceBAK operon. This study investigates the physiological and metabolic consequences of arcA and iclR deletions on E. coli K12 MG1655 under glucose abundant and limiting conditions and compares the results with the metabolic characteristics of E. coli BL21 (DE3). RESULTS: The deletion of arcA and iclR results in an increase in the biomass yield both under glucose abundant and limiting conditions, approaching the maximum theoretical yield of 0.65 c-mole/c-mole glucose under glucose abundant conditions. This can be explained by the lower flux through several CO(2 )producing pathways in the E. coli K12 ΔarcAΔiclR double knockout strain. Due to iclR gene deletion, the glyoxylate pathway is activated resulting in a redirection of 30% of the isocitrate molecules directly to succinate and malate without CO(2 )production. Furthermore, a higher flux at the entrance of the TCA was noticed due to arcA gene deletion, resulting in a reduced production of acetate and less carbon loss. Under glucose limiting conditions the flux through the glyoxylate pathway is further increased in the ΔiclR knockout strain, but this effect was not observed in the double knockout strain. Also a striking correlation between the glyoxylate flux data and the isocitrate lyase activity was observed for almost all strains and under both growth conditions, illustrating the transcriptional control of this pathway. Finally, similar central metabolic fluxes were observed in E. coli K12 ΔarcA ΔiclR compared to the industrially relevant E. coli BL21 (DE3), especially with respect to the pentose pathway, the glyoxylate pathway, and the TCA fluxes. In addition, a comparison of the genome sequences of the two strains showed that BL21 possesses two mutations in the promoter region of iclR and rare codons are present in arcA implying a lower tRNA acceptance. Both phenomena presumably result in a reduced ArcA and IclR synthesis in BL21, which contributes to the similar physiology as observed in E. coli K12 ΔarcAΔiclR. CONCLUSIONS: The deletion of arcA results in a decrease of repression on transcription of TCA cycle genes under glucose abundant conditions, without significantly affecting the glyoxylate pathway activity. IclR clearly represses transcription of glyoxylate pathway genes under glucose abundance, a condition in which Crp activation is absent. Under glucose limitation, Crp is responsible for the high glyoxylate flux, but IclR still represses transcription. Finally, in E. coli BL21 (DE3), ArcA and IclR are poorly expressed, explaining the similar fluxes observed compared to the ΔarcAΔiclR strain. BioMed Central 2011-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3094197/ /pubmed/21481254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-70 Text en Copyright ©2011 Waegeman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Waegeman, Hendrik
Beauprez, Joeri
Moens, Helena
Maertens, Jo
De Mey, Marjan
Foulquié-Moreno, Maria R
Heijnen, Joseph J
Charlier, Daniel
Soetaert, Wim
Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3)
title Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3)
title_full Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3)
title_fullStr Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3)
title_full_unstemmed Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3)
title_short Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3)
title_sort effect of iclr and arca knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in escherichia coli k12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of escherichia coli bl21 (de3)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21481254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-70
work_keys_str_mv AT waegemanhendrik effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3
AT beauprezjoeri effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3
AT moenshelena effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3
AT maertensjo effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3
AT demeymarjan effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3
AT foulquiemorenomariar effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3
AT heijnenjosephj effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3
AT charlierdaniel effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3
AT soetaertwim effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3