Cargando…
Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3)
BACKGROUND: Gene expression is regulated through a complex interplay of different transcription factors (TFs) which can enhance or inhibit gene transcription. ArcA is a global regulator that regulates genes involved in different metabolic pathways, while IclR as a local regulator, controls the trans...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21481254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-70 |
_version_ | 1782203514598981632 |
---|---|
author | Waegeman, Hendrik Beauprez, Joeri Moens, Helena Maertens, Jo De Mey, Marjan Foulquié-Moreno, Maria R Heijnen, Joseph J Charlier, Daniel Soetaert, Wim |
author_facet | Waegeman, Hendrik Beauprez, Joeri Moens, Helena Maertens, Jo De Mey, Marjan Foulquié-Moreno, Maria R Heijnen, Joseph J Charlier, Daniel Soetaert, Wim |
author_sort | Waegeman, Hendrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gene expression is regulated through a complex interplay of different transcription factors (TFs) which can enhance or inhibit gene transcription. ArcA is a global regulator that regulates genes involved in different metabolic pathways, while IclR as a local regulator, controls the transcription of the glyoxylate pathway genes of the aceBAK operon. This study investigates the physiological and metabolic consequences of arcA and iclR deletions on E. coli K12 MG1655 under glucose abundant and limiting conditions and compares the results with the metabolic characteristics of E. coli BL21 (DE3). RESULTS: The deletion of arcA and iclR results in an increase in the biomass yield both under glucose abundant and limiting conditions, approaching the maximum theoretical yield of 0.65 c-mole/c-mole glucose under glucose abundant conditions. This can be explained by the lower flux through several CO(2 )producing pathways in the E. coli K12 ΔarcAΔiclR double knockout strain. Due to iclR gene deletion, the glyoxylate pathway is activated resulting in a redirection of 30% of the isocitrate molecules directly to succinate and malate without CO(2 )production. Furthermore, a higher flux at the entrance of the TCA was noticed due to arcA gene deletion, resulting in a reduced production of acetate and less carbon loss. Under glucose limiting conditions the flux through the glyoxylate pathway is further increased in the ΔiclR knockout strain, but this effect was not observed in the double knockout strain. Also a striking correlation between the glyoxylate flux data and the isocitrate lyase activity was observed for almost all strains and under both growth conditions, illustrating the transcriptional control of this pathway. Finally, similar central metabolic fluxes were observed in E. coli K12 ΔarcA ΔiclR compared to the industrially relevant E. coli BL21 (DE3), especially with respect to the pentose pathway, the glyoxylate pathway, and the TCA fluxes. In addition, a comparison of the genome sequences of the two strains showed that BL21 possesses two mutations in the promoter region of iclR and rare codons are present in arcA implying a lower tRNA acceptance. Both phenomena presumably result in a reduced ArcA and IclR synthesis in BL21, which contributes to the similar physiology as observed in E. coli K12 ΔarcAΔiclR. CONCLUSIONS: The deletion of arcA results in a decrease of repression on transcription of TCA cycle genes under glucose abundant conditions, without significantly affecting the glyoxylate pathway activity. IclR clearly represses transcription of glyoxylate pathway genes under glucose abundance, a condition in which Crp activation is absent. Under glucose limitation, Crp is responsible for the high glyoxylate flux, but IclR still represses transcription. Finally, in E. coli BL21 (DE3), ArcA and IclR are poorly expressed, explaining the similar fluxes observed compared to the ΔarcAΔiclR strain. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3094197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30941972011-05-14 Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) Waegeman, Hendrik Beauprez, Joeri Moens, Helena Maertens, Jo De Mey, Marjan Foulquié-Moreno, Maria R Heijnen, Joseph J Charlier, Daniel Soetaert, Wim BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Gene expression is regulated through a complex interplay of different transcription factors (TFs) which can enhance or inhibit gene transcription. ArcA is a global regulator that regulates genes involved in different metabolic pathways, while IclR as a local regulator, controls the transcription of the glyoxylate pathway genes of the aceBAK operon. This study investigates the physiological and metabolic consequences of arcA and iclR deletions on E. coli K12 MG1655 under glucose abundant and limiting conditions and compares the results with the metabolic characteristics of E. coli BL21 (DE3). RESULTS: The deletion of arcA and iclR results in an increase in the biomass yield both under glucose abundant and limiting conditions, approaching the maximum theoretical yield of 0.65 c-mole/c-mole glucose under glucose abundant conditions. This can be explained by the lower flux through several CO(2 )producing pathways in the E. coli K12 ΔarcAΔiclR double knockout strain. Due to iclR gene deletion, the glyoxylate pathway is activated resulting in a redirection of 30% of the isocitrate molecules directly to succinate and malate without CO(2 )production. Furthermore, a higher flux at the entrance of the TCA was noticed due to arcA gene deletion, resulting in a reduced production of acetate and less carbon loss. Under glucose limiting conditions the flux through the glyoxylate pathway is further increased in the ΔiclR knockout strain, but this effect was not observed in the double knockout strain. Also a striking correlation between the glyoxylate flux data and the isocitrate lyase activity was observed for almost all strains and under both growth conditions, illustrating the transcriptional control of this pathway. Finally, similar central metabolic fluxes were observed in E. coli K12 ΔarcA ΔiclR compared to the industrially relevant E. coli BL21 (DE3), especially with respect to the pentose pathway, the glyoxylate pathway, and the TCA fluxes. In addition, a comparison of the genome sequences of the two strains showed that BL21 possesses two mutations in the promoter region of iclR and rare codons are present in arcA implying a lower tRNA acceptance. Both phenomena presumably result in a reduced ArcA and IclR synthesis in BL21, which contributes to the similar physiology as observed in E. coli K12 ΔarcAΔiclR. CONCLUSIONS: The deletion of arcA results in a decrease of repression on transcription of TCA cycle genes under glucose abundant conditions, without significantly affecting the glyoxylate pathway activity. IclR clearly represses transcription of glyoxylate pathway genes under glucose abundance, a condition in which Crp activation is absent. Under glucose limitation, Crp is responsible for the high glyoxylate flux, but IclR still represses transcription. Finally, in E. coli BL21 (DE3), ArcA and IclR are poorly expressed, explaining the similar fluxes observed compared to the ΔarcAΔiclR strain. BioMed Central 2011-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3094197/ /pubmed/21481254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-70 Text en Copyright ©2011 Waegeman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Waegeman, Hendrik Beauprez, Joeri Moens, Helena Maertens, Jo De Mey, Marjan Foulquié-Moreno, Maria R Heijnen, Joseph J Charlier, Daniel Soetaert, Wim Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) |
title | Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) |
title_full | Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) |
title_fullStr | Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) |
title_short | Effect of iclR and arcA knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) |
title_sort | effect of iclr and arca knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in escherichia coli k12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of escherichia coli bl21 (de3) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21481254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-70 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waegemanhendrik effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3 AT beauprezjoeri effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3 AT moenshelena effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3 AT maertensjo effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3 AT demeymarjan effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3 AT foulquiemorenomariar effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3 AT heijnenjosephj effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3 AT charlierdaniel effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3 AT soetaertwim effectoficlrandarcaknockoutsonbiomassformationandmetabolicfluxesinescherichiacolik12anditsimplicationsonunderstandingthemetabolismofescherichiacolibl21de3 |