Cargando…
Risk of infection in patients with lymphoma receiving rituximab: systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The addition of Rituximab (R) to standard chemotherapy (C) has been reported to improve the end of treatment outcome in patients affected by CD-20 positive malignant lymphomas (CD20+ ML). Nevertheless, given the profound and prolonged immunosuppression produced by R there are concerns th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21481281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-36 |
_version_ | 1782203523481468928 |
---|---|
author | Lanini, Simone Molloy, Aoife C Fine, Paul E Prentice, Archibald G Ippolito, Giuseppe Kibbler, Christopher C |
author_facet | Lanini, Simone Molloy, Aoife C Fine, Paul E Prentice, Archibald G Ippolito, Giuseppe Kibbler, Christopher C |
author_sort | Lanini, Simone |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The addition of Rituximab (R) to standard chemotherapy (C) has been reported to improve the end of treatment outcome in patients affected by CD-20 positive malignant lymphomas (CD20+ ML). Nevertheless, given the profound and prolonged immunosuppression produced by R there are concerns that severe infections may arise. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine whether or not the addition of R to C may increase the risk of severe infections in adults undergoing induction therapy for CD20+ ML. METHODS: Only randomised controlled trials comparing R-C to C standard alone in adult patients with CD20+ ML were included. Meta-analysis was performed on overall incidence of severe infection, risk of dying as the consequence of infection, risk of febrile neutropenia, risk of severe leucopenia, risk of severe granulocytopenia and overall response assuming a fixed effect model. Heterogeneity was investigated, if present and I(2 )>20%, according to several predefined baseline characteristics of the study populations. RESULTS: Several relevant results have emerged. First, the addition of R to standard C does not increase the overall risk of severe infections (RR = 1.00; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.14) nor does it increase the risk of dying as a consequence of infection (RR = 1.60; 95% CI 0.68 to 3.75). Second, we confirmed that the addition of R to standard C increases the proportion of overall response (RR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.15), but it also increases the risk of severe leucopenia (RR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.37) and granulocytopenia (RR = 1.07; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.12). CONCLUSIONS: R-C is superior to standard C in terms of overall response and it does not increase the overall incidence of severe infection. However, data on special groups of patients (for example, HIV positive subjects and HBV carriers) are lacking. In our opinion more studies are needed to explore the potential effect of R on silent and chronic viral infections. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3094236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30942362011-05-14 Risk of infection in patients with lymphoma receiving rituximab: systematic review and meta-analysis Lanini, Simone Molloy, Aoife C Fine, Paul E Prentice, Archibald G Ippolito, Giuseppe Kibbler, Christopher C BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The addition of Rituximab (R) to standard chemotherapy (C) has been reported to improve the end of treatment outcome in patients affected by CD-20 positive malignant lymphomas (CD20+ ML). Nevertheless, given the profound and prolonged immunosuppression produced by R there are concerns that severe infections may arise. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine whether or not the addition of R to C may increase the risk of severe infections in adults undergoing induction therapy for CD20+ ML. METHODS: Only randomised controlled trials comparing R-C to C standard alone in adult patients with CD20+ ML were included. Meta-analysis was performed on overall incidence of severe infection, risk of dying as the consequence of infection, risk of febrile neutropenia, risk of severe leucopenia, risk of severe granulocytopenia and overall response assuming a fixed effect model. Heterogeneity was investigated, if present and I(2 )>20%, according to several predefined baseline characteristics of the study populations. RESULTS: Several relevant results have emerged. First, the addition of R to standard C does not increase the overall risk of severe infections (RR = 1.00; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.14) nor does it increase the risk of dying as a consequence of infection (RR = 1.60; 95% CI 0.68 to 3.75). Second, we confirmed that the addition of R to standard C increases the proportion of overall response (RR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.15), but it also increases the risk of severe leucopenia (RR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.37) and granulocytopenia (RR = 1.07; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.12). CONCLUSIONS: R-C is superior to standard C in terms of overall response and it does not increase the overall incidence of severe infection. However, data on special groups of patients (for example, HIV positive subjects and HBV carriers) are lacking. In our opinion more studies are needed to explore the potential effect of R on silent and chronic viral infections. BioMed Central 2011-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3094236/ /pubmed/21481281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-36 Text en Copyright ©2011 Lanini et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lanini, Simone Molloy, Aoife C Fine, Paul E Prentice, Archibald G Ippolito, Giuseppe Kibbler, Christopher C Risk of infection in patients with lymphoma receiving rituximab: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Risk of infection in patients with lymphoma receiving rituximab: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Risk of infection in patients with lymphoma receiving rituximab: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Risk of infection in patients with lymphoma receiving rituximab: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk of infection in patients with lymphoma receiving rituximab: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Risk of infection in patients with lymphoma receiving rituximab: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | risk of infection in patients with lymphoma receiving rituximab: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21481281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-36 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laninisimone riskofinfectioninpatientswithlymphomareceivingrituximabsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT molloyaoifec riskofinfectioninpatientswithlymphomareceivingrituximabsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT finepaule riskofinfectioninpatientswithlymphomareceivingrituximabsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT prenticearchibaldg riskofinfectioninpatientswithlymphomareceivingrituximabsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ippolitogiuseppe riskofinfectioninpatientswithlymphomareceivingrituximabsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kibblerchristopherc riskofinfectioninpatientswithlymphomareceivingrituximabsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |