Cargando…

Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades

BACKGROUND: To assess patterns of use of abdominal imaging in the emergency department (ED) from 1990 to 2009. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data on adult ED patients treated between 1990 and 2009 at our university-affiliated quaternary care institution. Examinations were coded by abdominal i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raja, Ali S, Mortele, Koenraad J, Hanson, Richard, Sodickson, Aaron D, Zane, Richard, Khorasani, Ramin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21584210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-4-19
_version_ 1782203552557432832
author Raja, Ali S
Mortele, Koenraad J
Hanson, Richard
Sodickson, Aaron D
Zane, Richard
Khorasani, Ramin
author_facet Raja, Ali S
Mortele, Koenraad J
Hanson, Richard
Sodickson, Aaron D
Zane, Richard
Khorasani, Ramin
author_sort Raja, Ali S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess patterns of use of abdominal imaging in the emergency department (ED) from 1990 to 2009. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data on adult ED patients treated between 1990 and 2009 at our university-affiliated quaternary care institution. Examinations were coded by abdominal imaging modality: x-ray, sonography, CT, or MRI. Proportional costs for each imaging modality were evaluated using relative value units (RVUs). Chi-square tests were used to assess for significant trends. RESULTS: The intensity of abdominal imaging per 1,000 ED visits increased 19.3% from 1990-2009 (p = 0.0050). The number of abdominal CT scans per 1,000 ED visits increased 17.5-fold (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the number of abdominal MRIs per 1,000 ED visits increased from 0 to 1.0 (p < 0.0001), and the number of abdominal sonographs per 1,000 ED visits increased 51.6% (p = 0.0198). However, the number of x-ray examinations per 1,000 ED visits decreased 81.6% (p < 0.0001). Abdominal imaging RVUs per 1,000 ED visits increased 2.7-fold (p < 0.0001), due primarily to CT imaging, which accounted for 14% of RVUs in 1990 and 76% of RVUs in 2009. CONCLUSIONS: The intensity of abdominal imaging examinations per 1,000 ED visits and the number of abdominal imaging RVUs increased significantly over a 20-year period. CT replaced x-ray as the most common abdominal imaging modality for evaluation of ED patients. In light of these increasing costs as well as the increased radiation exposure of CT, clinical decision rules and computerized decision support may be needed to ensure appropriate utilization of abdominal CT in the ED.
format Text
id pubmed-3094362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30943622011-05-16 Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades Raja, Ali S Mortele, Koenraad J Hanson, Richard Sodickson, Aaron D Zane, Richard Khorasani, Ramin Int J Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: To assess patterns of use of abdominal imaging in the emergency department (ED) from 1990 to 2009. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data on adult ED patients treated between 1990 and 2009 at our university-affiliated quaternary care institution. Examinations were coded by abdominal imaging modality: x-ray, sonography, CT, or MRI. Proportional costs for each imaging modality were evaluated using relative value units (RVUs). Chi-square tests were used to assess for significant trends. RESULTS: The intensity of abdominal imaging per 1,000 ED visits increased 19.3% from 1990-2009 (p = 0.0050). The number of abdominal CT scans per 1,000 ED visits increased 17.5-fold (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the number of abdominal MRIs per 1,000 ED visits increased from 0 to 1.0 (p < 0.0001), and the number of abdominal sonographs per 1,000 ED visits increased 51.6% (p = 0.0198). However, the number of x-ray examinations per 1,000 ED visits decreased 81.6% (p < 0.0001). Abdominal imaging RVUs per 1,000 ED visits increased 2.7-fold (p < 0.0001), due primarily to CT imaging, which accounted for 14% of RVUs in 1990 and 76% of RVUs in 2009. CONCLUSIONS: The intensity of abdominal imaging examinations per 1,000 ED visits and the number of abdominal imaging RVUs increased significantly over a 20-year period. CT replaced x-ray as the most common abdominal imaging modality for evaluation of ED patients. In light of these increasing costs as well as the increased radiation exposure of CT, clinical decision rules and computerized decision support may be needed to ensure appropriate utilization of abdominal CT in the ED. Springer 2011-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3094362/ /pubmed/21584210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-4-19 Text en Copyright ©2011 Raja et al; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Raja, Ali S
Mortele, Koenraad J
Hanson, Richard
Sodickson, Aaron D
Zane, Richard
Khorasani, Ramin
Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades
title Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades
title_full Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades
title_fullStr Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades
title_full_unstemmed Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades
title_short Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades
title_sort abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21584210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-4-19
work_keys_str_mv AT rajaalis abdominalimagingutilizationintheemergencydepartmenttrendsovertwodecades
AT mortelekoenraadj abdominalimagingutilizationintheemergencydepartmenttrendsovertwodecades
AT hansonrichard abdominalimagingutilizationintheemergencydepartmenttrendsovertwodecades
AT sodicksonaarond abdominalimagingutilizationintheemergencydepartmenttrendsovertwodecades
AT zanerichard abdominalimagingutilizationintheemergencydepartmenttrendsovertwodecades
AT khorasaniramin abdominalimagingutilizationintheemergencydepartmenttrendsovertwodecades