Cargando…

Do differences in understory light contribute to species distributions along a tropical rainfall gradient?

In tropical forests, regional differences in annual rainfall correlate with differences in plant species composition. Although water availability is clearly one factor determining species distribution, other environmental variables that covary with rainfall may contribute to distributions. One such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brenes-Arguedas, T., Roddy, A. B., Coley, P. D., Kursar, Thomas A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21120671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1832-9
_version_ 1782203578978402304
author Brenes-Arguedas, T.
Roddy, A. B.
Coley, P. D.
Kursar, Thomas A.
author_facet Brenes-Arguedas, T.
Roddy, A. B.
Coley, P. D.
Kursar, Thomas A.
author_sort Brenes-Arguedas, T.
collection PubMed
description In tropical forests, regional differences in annual rainfall correlate with differences in plant species composition. Although water availability is clearly one factor determining species distribution, other environmental variables that covary with rainfall may contribute to distributions. One such variable is light availability in the understory, which decreases towards wetter forests due to differences in canopy density and phenology. We established common garden experiments in three sites along a rainfall gradient across the Isthmus of Panama in order to measure the differences in understory light availability, and to evaluate their influence on the performance of 24 shade-tolerant species with contrasting distributions. Within sites, the effect of understory light availability on species performance depended strongly on water availability. When water was not limiting, either naturally in the wetter site or through water supplementation in drier sites, seedling performance improved at higher light. In contrast, when water was limiting at the drier sites, seedling performance was reduced at higher light, presumably due to an increase in water stress that affected mostly wet-distribution species. Although wetter forest understories were on average darker, wet-distribution species were not more shade-tolerant than dry-distribution species. Instead, wet-distribution species had higher absolute growth rates and, when water was not limiting, were better able to take advantage of small increases in light than dry-distribution species. Our results suggest that in wet forests the ability to grow fast during temporary increases in light may be a key trait for successful recruitment. The slower growth rates of the dry-distribution species, possibly due to trade-offs associated with greater drought tolerance, may exclude these species from wetter forests. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00442-010-1832-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Text
id pubmed-3094538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30945382011-07-07 Do differences in understory light contribute to species distributions along a tropical rainfall gradient? Brenes-Arguedas, T. Roddy, A. B. Coley, P. D. Kursar, Thomas A. Oecologia Community ecology - Original Paper In tropical forests, regional differences in annual rainfall correlate with differences in plant species composition. Although water availability is clearly one factor determining species distribution, other environmental variables that covary with rainfall may contribute to distributions. One such variable is light availability in the understory, which decreases towards wetter forests due to differences in canopy density and phenology. We established common garden experiments in three sites along a rainfall gradient across the Isthmus of Panama in order to measure the differences in understory light availability, and to evaluate their influence on the performance of 24 shade-tolerant species with contrasting distributions. Within sites, the effect of understory light availability on species performance depended strongly on water availability. When water was not limiting, either naturally in the wetter site or through water supplementation in drier sites, seedling performance improved at higher light. In contrast, when water was limiting at the drier sites, seedling performance was reduced at higher light, presumably due to an increase in water stress that affected mostly wet-distribution species. Although wetter forest understories were on average darker, wet-distribution species were not more shade-tolerant than dry-distribution species. Instead, wet-distribution species had higher absolute growth rates and, when water was not limiting, were better able to take advantage of small increases in light than dry-distribution species. Our results suggest that in wet forests the ability to grow fast during temporary increases in light may be a key trait for successful recruitment. The slower growth rates of the dry-distribution species, possibly due to trade-offs associated with greater drought tolerance, may exclude these species from wetter forests. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00442-010-1832-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2010-12-01 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3094538/ /pubmed/21120671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1832-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Community ecology - Original Paper
Brenes-Arguedas, T.
Roddy, A. B.
Coley, P. D.
Kursar, Thomas A.
Do differences in understory light contribute to species distributions along a tropical rainfall gradient?
title Do differences in understory light contribute to species distributions along a tropical rainfall gradient?
title_full Do differences in understory light contribute to species distributions along a tropical rainfall gradient?
title_fullStr Do differences in understory light contribute to species distributions along a tropical rainfall gradient?
title_full_unstemmed Do differences in understory light contribute to species distributions along a tropical rainfall gradient?
title_short Do differences in understory light contribute to species distributions along a tropical rainfall gradient?
title_sort do differences in understory light contribute to species distributions along a tropical rainfall gradient?
topic Community ecology - Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21120671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1832-9
work_keys_str_mv AT brenesarguedast dodifferencesinunderstorylightcontributetospeciesdistributionsalongatropicalrainfallgradient
AT roddyab dodifferencesinunderstorylightcontributetospeciesdistributionsalongatropicalrainfallgradient
AT coleypd dodifferencesinunderstorylightcontributetospeciesdistributionsalongatropicalrainfallgradient
AT kursarthomasa dodifferencesinunderstorylightcontributetospeciesdistributionsalongatropicalrainfallgradient