Cargando…
The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification
Purpose. Striatal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of the dopaminergic system is becoming increasingly used for clinical and research studies. The question about the value of nonuniform attenuation correction has become more relevant with the increasing availability of hybr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21603235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/195037 |
_version_ | 1782203602972966912 |
---|---|
author | Warwick, J. M. Rubow, S. du Toit, M. Beetge, E. Carey, P. Dupont, P. |
author_facet | Warwick, J. M. Rubow, S. du Toit, M. Beetge, E. Carey, P. Dupont, P. |
author_sort | Warwick, J. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. Striatal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of the dopaminergic system is becoming increasingly used for clinical and research studies. The question about the value of nonuniform attenuation correction has become more relevant with the increasing availability of hybrid SPECT-CT scanners. In this study, the value of nonuniform attenuation correction and correction for collimator blurring were determined using both phantom data and patient data. Methods. SPECT imaging was performed using 7 anthropomorphic phantom measurements, and 14 patient studies using [I-123]-FP-CIT (DATSCAN). SPECT reconstruction was performed using uniform and nonuniform attenuation correction and collimator blurring corrections. Recovery values (phantom data) or average-specific uptake ratios (patient data) for the different reconstructions were compared at similar noise levels. Results. For the phantom data, improved recovery was found with nonuniform attenuation correction and collimator blurring corrections, with further improvement when performed together. However, for patient data the highest average specific uptake ratio was obtained using collimator blurring correction without nonuniform attenuation correction, probably due to subtle SPECT-CT misregistration. Conclusions. This study suggests that an optimal brain SPECT reconstruction (in terms of the lowest bias) in patients would include a correction for collimator blurring and uniform attenuation correction. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3094814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30948142011-05-20 The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification Warwick, J. M. Rubow, S. du Toit, M. Beetge, E. Carey, P. Dupont, P. Int J Mol Imaging Research Article Purpose. Striatal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of the dopaminergic system is becoming increasingly used for clinical and research studies. The question about the value of nonuniform attenuation correction has become more relevant with the increasing availability of hybrid SPECT-CT scanners. In this study, the value of nonuniform attenuation correction and correction for collimator blurring were determined using both phantom data and patient data. Methods. SPECT imaging was performed using 7 anthropomorphic phantom measurements, and 14 patient studies using [I-123]-FP-CIT (DATSCAN). SPECT reconstruction was performed using uniform and nonuniform attenuation correction and collimator blurring corrections. Recovery values (phantom data) or average-specific uptake ratios (patient data) for the different reconstructions were compared at similar noise levels. Results. For the phantom data, improved recovery was found with nonuniform attenuation correction and collimator blurring corrections, with further improvement when performed together. However, for patient data the highest average specific uptake ratio was obtained using collimator blurring correction without nonuniform attenuation correction, probably due to subtle SPECT-CT misregistration. Conclusions. This study suggests that an optimal brain SPECT reconstruction (in terms of the lowest bias) in patients would include a correction for collimator blurring and uniform attenuation correction. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3094814/ /pubmed/21603235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/195037 Text en Copyright © 2011 J. M. Warwick et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Warwick, J. M. Rubow, S. du Toit, M. Beetge, E. Carey, P. Dupont, P. The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification |
title | The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification |
title_full | The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification |
title_fullStr | The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification |
title_short | The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification |
title_sort | role of ct-based attenuation correction and collimator blurring correction in striatal spect quantification |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21603235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/195037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT warwickjm theroleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification AT rubows theroleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification AT dutoitm theroleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification AT beetgee theroleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification AT careyp theroleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification AT dupontp theroleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification AT warwickjm roleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification AT rubows roleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification AT dutoitm roleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification AT beetgee roleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification AT careyp roleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification AT dupontp roleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification |