Cargando…

The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification

Purpose. Striatal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of the dopaminergic system is becoming increasingly used for clinical and research studies. The question about the value of nonuniform attenuation correction has become more relevant with the increasing availability of hybr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warwick, J. M., Rubow, S., du Toit, M., Beetge, E., Carey, P., Dupont, P.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21603235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/195037
_version_ 1782203602972966912
author Warwick, J. M.
Rubow, S.
du Toit, M.
Beetge, E.
Carey, P.
Dupont, P.
author_facet Warwick, J. M.
Rubow, S.
du Toit, M.
Beetge, E.
Carey, P.
Dupont, P.
author_sort Warwick, J. M.
collection PubMed
description Purpose. Striatal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of the dopaminergic system is becoming increasingly used for clinical and research studies. The question about the value of nonuniform attenuation correction has become more relevant with the increasing availability of hybrid SPECT-CT scanners. In this study, the value of nonuniform attenuation correction and correction for collimator blurring were determined using both phantom data and patient data. Methods. SPECT imaging was performed using 7 anthropomorphic phantom measurements, and 14 patient studies using [I-123]-FP-CIT (DATSCAN). SPECT reconstruction was performed using uniform and nonuniform attenuation correction and collimator blurring corrections. Recovery values (phantom data) or average-specific uptake ratios (patient data) for the different reconstructions were compared at similar noise levels. Results. For the phantom data, improved recovery was found with nonuniform attenuation correction and collimator blurring corrections, with further improvement when performed together. However, for patient data the highest average specific uptake ratio was obtained using collimator blurring correction without nonuniform attenuation correction, probably due to subtle SPECT-CT misregistration. Conclusions. This study suggests that an optimal brain SPECT reconstruction (in terms of the lowest bias) in patients would include a correction for collimator blurring and uniform attenuation correction.
format Text
id pubmed-3094814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30948142011-05-20 The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification Warwick, J. M. Rubow, S. du Toit, M. Beetge, E. Carey, P. Dupont, P. Int J Mol Imaging Research Article Purpose. Striatal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of the dopaminergic system is becoming increasingly used for clinical and research studies. The question about the value of nonuniform attenuation correction has become more relevant with the increasing availability of hybrid SPECT-CT scanners. In this study, the value of nonuniform attenuation correction and correction for collimator blurring were determined using both phantom data and patient data. Methods. SPECT imaging was performed using 7 anthropomorphic phantom measurements, and 14 patient studies using [I-123]-FP-CIT (DATSCAN). SPECT reconstruction was performed using uniform and nonuniform attenuation correction and collimator blurring corrections. Recovery values (phantom data) or average-specific uptake ratios (patient data) for the different reconstructions were compared at similar noise levels. Results. For the phantom data, improved recovery was found with nonuniform attenuation correction and collimator blurring corrections, with further improvement when performed together. However, for patient data the highest average specific uptake ratio was obtained using collimator blurring correction without nonuniform attenuation correction, probably due to subtle SPECT-CT misregistration. Conclusions. This study suggests that an optimal brain SPECT reconstruction (in terms of the lowest bias) in patients would include a correction for collimator blurring and uniform attenuation correction. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3094814/ /pubmed/21603235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/195037 Text en Copyright © 2011 J. M. Warwick et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Warwick, J. M.
Rubow, S.
du Toit, M.
Beetge, E.
Carey, P.
Dupont, P.
The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification
title The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification
title_full The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification
title_fullStr The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification
title_full_unstemmed The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification
title_short The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification
title_sort role of ct-based attenuation correction and collimator blurring correction in striatal spect quantification
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21603235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/195037
work_keys_str_mv AT warwickjm theroleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification
AT rubows theroleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification
AT dutoitm theroleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification
AT beetgee theroleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification
AT careyp theroleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification
AT dupontp theroleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification
AT warwickjm roleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification
AT rubows roleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification
AT dutoitm roleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification
AT beetgee roleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification
AT careyp roleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification
AT dupontp roleofctbasedattenuationcorrectionandcollimatorblurringcorrectioninstriatalspectquantification