Cargando…
Comparison of (111)In Leakage from Labeled Endocardial and Epicardial Cells: Impact on Modeling Viability of Cells to Be Transplanted into Myocardium
Introduction. Previously we proposed a cellular imaging technique to determine the surviving fraction of transplanted cells in vivo. Epicardial kinetics using Indium-111 determined the Debris Impulse Response Function (DIRF) and leakage coefficient parameters. Convolution-based modeling which correc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21603238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/472375 |
_version_ | 1782203604379107328 |
---|---|
author | Blackwood, Kimberley J. Sykes, Jane Deans, Lela Wisenberg, Gerald Prato, Frank S. |
author_facet | Blackwood, Kimberley J. Sykes, Jane Deans, Lela Wisenberg, Gerald Prato, Frank S. |
author_sort | Blackwood, Kimberley J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. Previously we proposed a cellular imaging technique to determine the surviving fraction of transplanted cells in vivo. Epicardial kinetics using Indium-111 determined the Debris Impulse Response Function (DIRF) and leakage coefficient parameters. Convolution-based modeling which corrected for these signal contributions indicated that (111)In activity was quantitative of cell viability with half-lives within 20 hrs to 37 days. We determine if the 37-day upper limit remains valid for endocardial injections by comparing previous epicardial cell leakage parameter estimates to those for endocardial cells. Methods. Normal canine myocardium was injected ((111)In-tropolone) epicardially (9 injections) or endocardially (10 injections). Continuous whole body and SPECT scans for 5 hours were acquired with three weekly follow-up imaging sessions up to 20–26 days. Time-activity curves evaluated each injection type. Results. The epicardial and endocardial kinetics were not significantly different (Epi: 1286 ± 253; Endo: 1567 ± 470 hours P = .62). Conclusion. The original epicardial estimate of leakage kinetics has been validated for use in endocardial injections. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3094859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30948592011-05-20 Comparison of (111)In Leakage from Labeled Endocardial and Epicardial Cells: Impact on Modeling Viability of Cells to Be Transplanted into Myocardium Blackwood, Kimberley J. Sykes, Jane Deans, Lela Wisenberg, Gerald Prato, Frank S. Int J Mol Imaging Research Article Introduction. Previously we proposed a cellular imaging technique to determine the surviving fraction of transplanted cells in vivo. Epicardial kinetics using Indium-111 determined the Debris Impulse Response Function (DIRF) and leakage coefficient parameters. Convolution-based modeling which corrected for these signal contributions indicated that (111)In activity was quantitative of cell viability with half-lives within 20 hrs to 37 days. We determine if the 37-day upper limit remains valid for endocardial injections by comparing previous epicardial cell leakage parameter estimates to those for endocardial cells. Methods. Normal canine myocardium was injected ((111)In-tropolone) epicardially (9 injections) or endocardially (10 injections). Continuous whole body and SPECT scans for 5 hours were acquired with three weekly follow-up imaging sessions up to 20–26 days. Time-activity curves evaluated each injection type. Results. The epicardial and endocardial kinetics were not significantly different (Epi: 1286 ± 253; Endo: 1567 ± 470 hours P = .62). Conclusion. The original epicardial estimate of leakage kinetics has been validated for use in endocardial injections. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3094859/ /pubmed/21603238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/472375 Text en Copyright © 2011 Kimberley J. Blackwood et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Blackwood, Kimberley J. Sykes, Jane Deans, Lela Wisenberg, Gerald Prato, Frank S. Comparison of (111)In Leakage from Labeled Endocardial and Epicardial Cells: Impact on Modeling Viability of Cells to Be Transplanted into Myocardium |
title | Comparison of (111)In Leakage from Labeled Endocardial and Epicardial Cells: Impact on Modeling Viability of Cells to Be Transplanted into Myocardium |
title_full | Comparison of (111)In Leakage from Labeled Endocardial and Epicardial Cells: Impact on Modeling Viability of Cells to Be Transplanted into Myocardium |
title_fullStr | Comparison of (111)In Leakage from Labeled Endocardial and Epicardial Cells: Impact on Modeling Viability of Cells to Be Transplanted into Myocardium |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of (111)In Leakage from Labeled Endocardial and Epicardial Cells: Impact on Modeling Viability of Cells to Be Transplanted into Myocardium |
title_short | Comparison of (111)In Leakage from Labeled Endocardial and Epicardial Cells: Impact on Modeling Viability of Cells to Be Transplanted into Myocardium |
title_sort | comparison of (111)in leakage from labeled endocardial and epicardial cells: impact on modeling viability of cells to be transplanted into myocardium |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3094859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21603238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/472375 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blackwoodkimberleyj comparisonof111inleakagefromlabeledendocardialandepicardialcellsimpactonmodelingviabilityofcellstobetransplantedintomyocardium AT sykesjane comparisonof111inleakagefromlabeledendocardialandepicardialcellsimpactonmodelingviabilityofcellstobetransplantedintomyocardium AT deanslela comparisonof111inleakagefromlabeledendocardialandepicardialcellsimpactonmodelingviabilityofcellstobetransplantedintomyocardium AT wisenberggerald comparisonof111inleakagefromlabeledendocardialandepicardialcellsimpactonmodelingviabilityofcellstobetransplantedintomyocardium AT pratofranks comparisonof111inleakagefromlabeledendocardialandepicardialcellsimpactonmodelingviabilityofcellstobetransplantedintomyocardium |