Cargando…
Endoscopic Bulking Materials for the Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Review of Our 20 Years of Experience and Review of the Literature
Purpose. We reviewed our 20 years of experience and the current literature regarding the long-term outcome of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) using the different tissue bulking substances with a special emphasis on the long-term efficacy. Material and Methods. Our own experience...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3095422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21603212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/309626 |
_version_ | 1782203650259550208 |
---|---|
author | Chertin, Boris Kocherov, Stanislav Chertin, Leonid Natsheh, Alaeddin Farkas, Amicur Shenfeld, Ofer Z. Halachmi, Sarel |
author_facet | Chertin, Boris Kocherov, Stanislav Chertin, Leonid Natsheh, Alaeddin Farkas, Amicur Shenfeld, Ofer Z. Halachmi, Sarel |
author_sort | Chertin, Boris |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. We reviewed our 20 years of experience and the current literature regarding the long-term outcome of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) using the different tissue bulking substances with a special emphasis on the long-term efficacy. Material and Methods. Our own experience and the current literature on the long-term results after endoscopic treatment using various bulking agents were reviewed. Results. Short-term data following endoscopic treatment of VUR is similar to the various substances and comparable in the majority of the series to the success rate following open surgery. Recently, a relatively high recurrence rate was noticed especially with the use of dextranomer hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA) as a tissue augmenting material which raises the need for further search for alternative substances. Conclusions. Unfortunately, there is a significant shortage of evidence-based literature on the long-term followup after endoscopic correction of reflux with various substances. No doubt, there is a high recurrence rate during long-term followup after Dx/HA injection, and there is probably lack of proper evaluation regarding the long-term efficacy of other bulking materials. These facts demand long-term close observation and long-term studies beyond the routine protocols following endoscopic treatment of VUR and the correct parental counseling upon the endoscopic correction. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3095422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30954222011-05-20 Endoscopic Bulking Materials for the Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Review of Our 20 Years of Experience and Review of the Literature Chertin, Boris Kocherov, Stanislav Chertin, Leonid Natsheh, Alaeddin Farkas, Amicur Shenfeld, Ofer Z. Halachmi, Sarel Adv Urol Research Article Purpose. We reviewed our 20 years of experience and the current literature regarding the long-term outcome of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) using the different tissue bulking substances with a special emphasis on the long-term efficacy. Material and Methods. Our own experience and the current literature on the long-term results after endoscopic treatment using various bulking agents were reviewed. Results. Short-term data following endoscopic treatment of VUR is similar to the various substances and comparable in the majority of the series to the success rate following open surgery. Recently, a relatively high recurrence rate was noticed especially with the use of dextranomer hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA) as a tissue augmenting material which raises the need for further search for alternative substances. Conclusions. Unfortunately, there is a significant shortage of evidence-based literature on the long-term followup after endoscopic correction of reflux with various substances. No doubt, there is a high recurrence rate during long-term followup after Dx/HA injection, and there is probably lack of proper evaluation regarding the long-term efficacy of other bulking materials. These facts demand long-term close observation and long-term studies beyond the routine protocols following endoscopic treatment of VUR and the correct parental counseling upon the endoscopic correction. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3095422/ /pubmed/21603212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/309626 Text en Copyright © 2011 Boris Chertin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chertin, Boris Kocherov, Stanislav Chertin, Leonid Natsheh, Alaeddin Farkas, Amicur Shenfeld, Ofer Z. Halachmi, Sarel Endoscopic Bulking Materials for the Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Review of Our 20 Years of Experience and Review of the Literature |
title | Endoscopic Bulking Materials for the Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Review of Our 20 Years of Experience and Review of the Literature |
title_full | Endoscopic Bulking Materials for the Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Review of Our 20 Years of Experience and Review of the Literature |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic Bulking Materials for the Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Review of Our 20 Years of Experience and Review of the Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic Bulking Materials for the Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Review of Our 20 Years of Experience and Review of the Literature |
title_short | Endoscopic Bulking Materials for the Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Review of Our 20 Years of Experience and Review of the Literature |
title_sort | endoscopic bulking materials for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux: a review of our 20 years of experience and review of the literature |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3095422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21603212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/309626 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chertinboris endoscopicbulkingmaterialsforthetreatmentofvesicoureteralrefluxareviewofour20yearsofexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT kocherovstanislav endoscopicbulkingmaterialsforthetreatmentofvesicoureteralrefluxareviewofour20yearsofexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT chertinleonid endoscopicbulkingmaterialsforthetreatmentofvesicoureteralrefluxareviewofour20yearsofexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT natshehalaeddin endoscopicbulkingmaterialsforthetreatmentofvesicoureteralrefluxareviewofour20yearsofexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT farkasamicur endoscopicbulkingmaterialsforthetreatmentofvesicoureteralrefluxareviewofour20yearsofexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT shenfeldoferz endoscopicbulkingmaterialsforthetreatmentofvesicoureteralrefluxareviewofour20yearsofexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT halachmisarel endoscopicbulkingmaterialsforthetreatmentofvesicoureteralrefluxareviewofour20yearsofexperienceandreviewoftheliterature |