Cargando…
A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval is often performed under local anaesthesia on an outpatient basis. The objective of this study was to compare the overall pain experience of a newly designed reduced needle (RN) compared with a thicker standard needle (SN). METHODS: A prosp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21467200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der100 |
_version_ | 1782203724373950464 |
---|---|
author | Wikland, M. Blad, S. Bungum, L. Hillensjö, T. Karlström, P.O. Nilsson, S. |
author_facet | Wikland, M. Blad, S. Bungum, L. Hillensjö, T. Karlström, P.O. Nilsson, S. |
author_sort | Wikland, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval is often performed under local anaesthesia on an outpatient basis. The objective of this study was to compare the overall pain experience of a newly designed reduced needle (RN) compared with a thicker standard needle (SN). METHODS: A prospective, randomized, multi-centre study was performed at four different clinics from June to December 2009. The oocyte aspiration was performed under local anaesthesia, either with a needle with a reduced diameter (0.9 mm) for the last 50 mm from the tip (RN) or with a SN (1.4 mm). A total of 257 patients were randomized (RN: n = 129; SN: n = 128). The primary endpoint was the overall pain experience self-assessed and registered by the patient on a visual analogue scale (VAS 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = unbearable pain) immediately after the oocyte retrieval. Secondary end-points such as vaginal bleeding and several embryological parameters were also registered. RESULTS: The overall pain during the oocyte retrieval procedure was significantly lower in the RN group than in the SN group (mean 21.0 mm, SD 17.5 mm and median 19.0 mm versus mean 26.0 mm, SD 19.9 mm and median 24.0 mm; P = 0.040, difference between groups mean−5.0 mm, 95% CI: 9.7 to−0.4). This was also true when adjusting for baseline characteristics such as number of follicles, number of previous oocyte pick-up, body mass index and age, by a multiple linear regression analysis. Significantly more patients (40 of 126) had less than expected vaginal bleeding in the RN group when compared with the SN group (24 of 124; 32 versus 19%; P = 0.03 and 95% CI 1.7–23.0%). No differences were found between the two needles with regard to additional i.v. analgesia, aspiration time, oocyte recovery, fertilization, cleavage rate, number of good quality embryos, number of embryos for freezing and pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: Oocyte aspiration performed with the newly designed thinner-tipped needle resulted in significantly less overall pain and less vaginal bleeding, without prolonging the retrieval procedure or influence the oocyte recovery rate, when compared with a SN. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00924885 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3096561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30965612011-05-18 A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration Wikland, M. Blad, S. Bungum, L. Hillensjö, T. Karlström, P.O. Nilsson, S. Hum Reprod Original Articles BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval is often performed under local anaesthesia on an outpatient basis. The objective of this study was to compare the overall pain experience of a newly designed reduced needle (RN) compared with a thicker standard needle (SN). METHODS: A prospective, randomized, multi-centre study was performed at four different clinics from June to December 2009. The oocyte aspiration was performed under local anaesthesia, either with a needle with a reduced diameter (0.9 mm) for the last 50 mm from the tip (RN) or with a SN (1.4 mm). A total of 257 patients were randomized (RN: n = 129; SN: n = 128). The primary endpoint was the overall pain experience self-assessed and registered by the patient on a visual analogue scale (VAS 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = unbearable pain) immediately after the oocyte retrieval. Secondary end-points such as vaginal bleeding and several embryological parameters were also registered. RESULTS: The overall pain during the oocyte retrieval procedure was significantly lower in the RN group than in the SN group (mean 21.0 mm, SD 17.5 mm and median 19.0 mm versus mean 26.0 mm, SD 19.9 mm and median 24.0 mm; P = 0.040, difference between groups mean−5.0 mm, 95% CI: 9.7 to−0.4). This was also true when adjusting for baseline characteristics such as number of follicles, number of previous oocyte pick-up, body mass index and age, by a multiple linear regression analysis. Significantly more patients (40 of 126) had less than expected vaginal bleeding in the RN group when compared with the SN group (24 of 124; 32 versus 19%; P = 0.03 and 95% CI 1.7–23.0%). No differences were found between the two needles with regard to additional i.v. analgesia, aspiration time, oocyte recovery, fertilization, cleavage rate, number of good quality embryos, number of embryos for freezing and pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: Oocyte aspiration performed with the newly designed thinner-tipped needle resulted in significantly less overall pain and less vaginal bleeding, without prolonging the retrieval procedure or influence the oocyte recovery rate, when compared with a SN. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00924885 Oxford University Press 2011-06 2011-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3096561/ /pubmed/21467200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der100 Text en © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Wikland, M. Blad, S. Bungum, L. Hillensjö, T. Karlström, P.O. Nilsson, S. A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration |
title | A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration |
title_full | A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration |
title_fullStr | A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration |
title_short | A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration |
title_sort | randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21467200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiklandm arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration AT blads arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration AT bunguml arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration AT hillensjot arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration AT karlstrompo arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration AT nilssons arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration AT wiklandm randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration AT blads randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration AT bunguml randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration AT hillensjot randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration AT karlstrompo randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration AT nilssons randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration |