Cargando…

A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval is often performed under local anaesthesia on an outpatient basis. The objective of this study was to compare the overall pain experience of a newly designed reduced needle (RN) compared with a thicker standard needle (SN). METHODS: A prosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wikland, M., Blad, S., Bungum, L., Hillensjö, T., Karlström, P.O., Nilsson, S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21467200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der100
_version_ 1782203724373950464
author Wikland, M.
Blad, S.
Bungum, L.
Hillensjö, T.
Karlström, P.O.
Nilsson, S.
author_facet Wikland, M.
Blad, S.
Bungum, L.
Hillensjö, T.
Karlström, P.O.
Nilsson, S.
author_sort Wikland, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval is often performed under local anaesthesia on an outpatient basis. The objective of this study was to compare the overall pain experience of a newly designed reduced needle (RN) compared with a thicker standard needle (SN). METHODS: A prospective, randomized, multi-centre study was performed at four different clinics from June to December 2009. The oocyte aspiration was performed under local anaesthesia, either with a needle with a reduced diameter (0.9 mm) for the last 50 mm from the tip (RN) or with a SN (1.4 mm). A total of 257 patients were randomized (RN: n = 129; SN: n = 128). The primary endpoint was the overall pain experience self-assessed and registered by the patient on a visual analogue scale (VAS 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = unbearable pain) immediately after the oocyte retrieval. Secondary end-points such as vaginal bleeding and several embryological parameters were also registered. RESULTS: The overall pain during the oocyte retrieval procedure was significantly lower in the RN group than in the SN group (mean 21.0 mm, SD 17.5 mm and median 19.0 mm versus mean 26.0 mm, SD 19.9 mm and median 24.0 mm; P = 0.040, difference between groups mean−5.0 mm, 95% CI: 9.7 to−0.4). This was also true when adjusting for baseline characteristics such as number of follicles, number of previous oocyte pick-up, body mass index and age, by a multiple linear regression analysis. Significantly more patients (40 of 126) had less than expected vaginal bleeding in the RN group when compared with the SN group (24 of 124; 32 versus 19%; P = 0.03 and 95% CI 1.7–23.0%). No differences were found between the two needles with regard to additional i.v. analgesia, aspiration time, oocyte recovery, fertilization, cleavage rate, number of good quality embryos, number of embryos for freezing and pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: Oocyte aspiration performed with the newly designed thinner-tipped needle resulted in significantly less overall pain and less vaginal bleeding, without prolonging the retrieval procedure or influence the oocyte recovery rate, when compared with a SN. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00924885
format Text
id pubmed-3096561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30965612011-05-18 A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration Wikland, M. Blad, S. Bungum, L. Hillensjö, T. Karlström, P.O. Nilsson, S. Hum Reprod Original Articles BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval is often performed under local anaesthesia on an outpatient basis. The objective of this study was to compare the overall pain experience of a newly designed reduced needle (RN) compared with a thicker standard needle (SN). METHODS: A prospective, randomized, multi-centre study was performed at four different clinics from June to December 2009. The oocyte aspiration was performed under local anaesthesia, either with a needle with a reduced diameter (0.9 mm) for the last 50 mm from the tip (RN) or with a SN (1.4 mm). A total of 257 patients were randomized (RN: n = 129; SN: n = 128). The primary endpoint was the overall pain experience self-assessed and registered by the patient on a visual analogue scale (VAS 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = unbearable pain) immediately after the oocyte retrieval. Secondary end-points such as vaginal bleeding and several embryological parameters were also registered. RESULTS: The overall pain during the oocyte retrieval procedure was significantly lower in the RN group than in the SN group (mean 21.0 mm, SD 17.5 mm and median 19.0 mm versus mean 26.0 mm, SD 19.9 mm and median 24.0 mm; P = 0.040, difference between groups mean−5.0 mm, 95% CI: 9.7 to−0.4). This was also true when adjusting for baseline characteristics such as number of follicles, number of previous oocyte pick-up, body mass index and age, by a multiple linear regression analysis. Significantly more patients (40 of 126) had less than expected vaginal bleeding in the RN group when compared with the SN group (24 of 124; 32 versus 19%; P = 0.03 and 95% CI 1.7–23.0%). No differences were found between the two needles with regard to additional i.v. analgesia, aspiration time, oocyte recovery, fertilization, cleavage rate, number of good quality embryos, number of embryos for freezing and pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: Oocyte aspiration performed with the newly designed thinner-tipped needle resulted in significantly less overall pain and less vaginal bleeding, without prolonging the retrieval procedure or influence the oocyte recovery rate, when compared with a SN. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00924885 Oxford University Press 2011-06 2011-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3096561/ /pubmed/21467200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der100 Text en © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wikland, M.
Blad, S.
Bungum, L.
Hillensjö, T.
Karlström, P.O.
Nilsson, S.
A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration
title A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration
title_full A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration
title_fullStr A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration
title_short A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration
title_sort randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21467200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der100
work_keys_str_mv AT wiklandm arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration
AT blads arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration
AT bunguml arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration
AT hillensjot arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration
AT karlstrompo arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration
AT nilssons arandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration
AT wiklandm randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration
AT blads randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration
AT bunguml randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration
AT hillensjot randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration
AT karlstrompo randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration
AT nilssons randomizedcontrolledstudycomparingpainexperiencebetweenanewlydesignedneedlewithathintipandastandardneedleforoocyteaspiration