Cargando…

Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma

BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy of the EX-PRESS(®) glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma up to five years after surgery. METHODS: Patients from a previously reported randomized, open-label, parallel-arm clinical trial in which 78 patients received...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Jong, Leo, Lafuma, Antoine, Aguadé, Anne-Sophie, Berdeaux, Gilles
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21607021
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S18565
_version_ 1782203735454253056
author de Jong, Leo
Lafuma, Antoine
Aguadé, Anne-Sophie
Berdeaux, Gilles
author_facet de Jong, Leo
Lafuma, Antoine
Aguadé, Anne-Sophie
Berdeaux, Gilles
author_sort de Jong, Leo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy of the EX-PRESS(®) glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma up to five years after surgery. METHODS: Patients from a previously reported randomized, open-label, parallel-arm clinical trial in which 78 patients received either the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device or underwent a trabeculectomy were followed for up to an additional four years (five total) beyond the original study (39 eyes per treatment group). Risk-benefit data were obtained for up to five years after glaucoma surgery. Outcome variables were intraocular pressures and intraocular pressure medications. Complete success was denoted by intraocular pressure values ≤ 18 mmHg without medication. RESULTS: The EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device controlled intraocular pressure more effectively without medication for more patients from year 1 (86.8% versus 61.5%, P = 0.01) to year 3 (66.7% versus 41.0%, P = 0.02) than trabeculectomy. At year 1, only 12.8% of patients required intraocular pressure medication after EX-PRESS implantation, compared with 35.9% after trabeculectomy. The proportions became closer at year 5 (41% versus 53.9%). The responder rate was higher with EX-PRESS and time to failure was longer. In addition, surgical interventions for complications were fewer after EX-PRESS implantation. CONCLUSION: This five-year analysis confirmed and extended the results reported after one year. Compared with trabeculectomy, EX-PRESS provided better intraocular pressure control in the first three years, and patients required fewer intraocular pressure medications and fewer surgical interventions during the five-year study period. For patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device, implanted under a superficial scleral flap, produced significantly higher success rates than trabeculectomy. EX-PRESS is an effective device for long-term treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma.
format Text
id pubmed-3096614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30966142011-05-23 Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma de Jong, Leo Lafuma, Antoine Aguadé, Anne-Sophie Berdeaux, Gilles Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy of the EX-PRESS(®) glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma up to five years after surgery. METHODS: Patients from a previously reported randomized, open-label, parallel-arm clinical trial in which 78 patients received either the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device or underwent a trabeculectomy were followed for up to an additional four years (five total) beyond the original study (39 eyes per treatment group). Risk-benefit data were obtained for up to five years after glaucoma surgery. Outcome variables were intraocular pressures and intraocular pressure medications. Complete success was denoted by intraocular pressure values ≤ 18 mmHg without medication. RESULTS: The EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device controlled intraocular pressure more effectively without medication for more patients from year 1 (86.8% versus 61.5%, P = 0.01) to year 3 (66.7% versus 41.0%, P = 0.02) than trabeculectomy. At year 1, only 12.8% of patients required intraocular pressure medication after EX-PRESS implantation, compared with 35.9% after trabeculectomy. The proportions became closer at year 5 (41% versus 53.9%). The responder rate was higher with EX-PRESS and time to failure was longer. In addition, surgical interventions for complications were fewer after EX-PRESS implantation. CONCLUSION: This five-year analysis confirmed and extended the results reported after one year. Compared with trabeculectomy, EX-PRESS provided better intraocular pressure control in the first three years, and patients required fewer intraocular pressure medications and fewer surgical interventions during the five-year study period. For patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device, implanted under a superficial scleral flap, produced significantly higher success rates than trabeculectomy. EX-PRESS is an effective device for long-term treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3096614/ /pubmed/21607021 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S18565 Text en © 2011 de Jong et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
de Jong, Leo
Lafuma, Antoine
Aguadé, Anne-Sophie
Berdeaux, Gilles
Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma
title Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma
title_full Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma
title_fullStr Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma
title_short Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma
title_sort five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the ex-press glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21607021
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S18565
work_keys_str_mv AT dejongleo fiveyearextensionofaclinicaltrialcomparingtheexpressglaucomafiltrationdeviceandtrabeculectomyinprimaryopenangleglaucoma
AT lafumaantoine fiveyearextensionofaclinicaltrialcomparingtheexpressglaucomafiltrationdeviceandtrabeculectomyinprimaryopenangleglaucoma
AT aguadeannesophie fiveyearextensionofaclinicaltrialcomparingtheexpressglaucomafiltrationdeviceandtrabeculectomyinprimaryopenangleglaucoma
AT berdeauxgilles fiveyearextensionofaclinicaltrialcomparingtheexpressglaucomafiltrationdeviceandtrabeculectomyinprimaryopenangleglaucoma