Cargando…
Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma
BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy of the EX-PRESS(®) glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma up to five years after surgery. METHODS: Patients from a previously reported randomized, open-label, parallel-arm clinical trial in which 78 patients received...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21607021 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S18565 |
_version_ | 1782203735454253056 |
---|---|
author | de Jong, Leo Lafuma, Antoine Aguadé, Anne-Sophie Berdeaux, Gilles |
author_facet | de Jong, Leo Lafuma, Antoine Aguadé, Anne-Sophie Berdeaux, Gilles |
author_sort | de Jong, Leo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy of the EX-PRESS(®) glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma up to five years after surgery. METHODS: Patients from a previously reported randomized, open-label, parallel-arm clinical trial in which 78 patients received either the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device or underwent a trabeculectomy were followed for up to an additional four years (five total) beyond the original study (39 eyes per treatment group). Risk-benefit data were obtained for up to five years after glaucoma surgery. Outcome variables were intraocular pressures and intraocular pressure medications. Complete success was denoted by intraocular pressure values ≤ 18 mmHg without medication. RESULTS: The EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device controlled intraocular pressure more effectively without medication for more patients from year 1 (86.8% versus 61.5%, P = 0.01) to year 3 (66.7% versus 41.0%, P = 0.02) than trabeculectomy. At year 1, only 12.8% of patients required intraocular pressure medication after EX-PRESS implantation, compared with 35.9% after trabeculectomy. The proportions became closer at year 5 (41% versus 53.9%). The responder rate was higher with EX-PRESS and time to failure was longer. In addition, surgical interventions for complications were fewer after EX-PRESS implantation. CONCLUSION: This five-year analysis confirmed and extended the results reported after one year. Compared with trabeculectomy, EX-PRESS provided better intraocular pressure control in the first three years, and patients required fewer intraocular pressure medications and fewer surgical interventions during the five-year study period. For patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device, implanted under a superficial scleral flap, produced significantly higher success rates than trabeculectomy. EX-PRESS is an effective device for long-term treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3096614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30966142011-05-23 Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma de Jong, Leo Lafuma, Antoine Aguadé, Anne-Sophie Berdeaux, Gilles Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy of the EX-PRESS(®) glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma up to five years after surgery. METHODS: Patients from a previously reported randomized, open-label, parallel-arm clinical trial in which 78 patients received either the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device or underwent a trabeculectomy were followed for up to an additional four years (five total) beyond the original study (39 eyes per treatment group). Risk-benefit data were obtained for up to five years after glaucoma surgery. Outcome variables were intraocular pressures and intraocular pressure medications. Complete success was denoted by intraocular pressure values ≤ 18 mmHg without medication. RESULTS: The EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device controlled intraocular pressure more effectively without medication for more patients from year 1 (86.8% versus 61.5%, P = 0.01) to year 3 (66.7% versus 41.0%, P = 0.02) than trabeculectomy. At year 1, only 12.8% of patients required intraocular pressure medication after EX-PRESS implantation, compared with 35.9% after trabeculectomy. The proportions became closer at year 5 (41% versus 53.9%). The responder rate was higher with EX-PRESS and time to failure was longer. In addition, surgical interventions for complications were fewer after EX-PRESS implantation. CONCLUSION: This five-year analysis confirmed and extended the results reported after one year. Compared with trabeculectomy, EX-PRESS provided better intraocular pressure control in the first three years, and patients required fewer intraocular pressure medications and fewer surgical interventions during the five-year study period. For patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device, implanted under a superficial scleral flap, produced significantly higher success rates than trabeculectomy. EX-PRESS is an effective device for long-term treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3096614/ /pubmed/21607021 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S18565 Text en © 2011 de Jong et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research de Jong, Leo Lafuma, Antoine Aguadé, Anne-Sophie Berdeaux, Gilles Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma |
title | Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma |
title_full | Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma |
title_fullStr | Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma |
title_short | Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma |
title_sort | five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the ex-press glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21607021 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S18565 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dejongleo fiveyearextensionofaclinicaltrialcomparingtheexpressglaucomafiltrationdeviceandtrabeculectomyinprimaryopenangleglaucoma AT lafumaantoine fiveyearextensionofaclinicaltrialcomparingtheexpressglaucomafiltrationdeviceandtrabeculectomyinprimaryopenangleglaucoma AT aguadeannesophie fiveyearextensionofaclinicaltrialcomparingtheexpressglaucomafiltrationdeviceandtrabeculectomyinprimaryopenangleglaucoma AT berdeauxgilles fiveyearextensionofaclinicaltrialcomparingtheexpressglaucomafiltrationdeviceandtrabeculectomyinprimaryopenangleglaucoma |