Cargando…

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Attentional Feedback to Area V1 during Serial Visual Search

Visual search tasks have been used to understand how, where and when attention influences visual processing. Current theories suggest the involvement of a high-level “saliency map” that selects a candidate location to focus attentional resources. For a parallel (or “pop-out”) task, the first chosen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dugué, Laura, Marque, Philippe, VanRullen, Rufin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21611188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019712
_version_ 1782203739928526848
author Dugué, Laura
Marque, Philippe
VanRullen, Rufin
author_facet Dugué, Laura
Marque, Philippe
VanRullen, Rufin
author_sort Dugué, Laura
collection PubMed
description Visual search tasks have been used to understand how, where and when attention influences visual processing. Current theories suggest the involvement of a high-level “saliency map” that selects a candidate location to focus attentional resources. For a parallel (or “pop-out”) task, the first chosen location is systematically the target, but for a serial (or “difficult”) task, the system may cycle on a few distractors before finally focusing on the target. This implies that attentional effects upon early visual areas, involving feedback from higher areas, should be visible at longer latencies during serial search. A previous study from Juan & Walsh (2003) had used Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to support this conclusion; however, only a few post-stimulus delays were compared, and no control TMS location was used. Here we applied TMS double-pulses (sub-threshold) to induce a transient inhibition of area V1 at every post-stimulus delay between 100 ms and 500 ms (50 ms steps). The search array was presented either at the location affected by the TMS pulses (previously identified by applying several pulses at supra-threshold intensity to induce phosphene perception), or in the opposite hemifield, which served as a retinotopically-defined control location. Two search tasks were used: a parallel (+ among Ls) and a serial one (T among Ls). TMS specifically impaired the serial, but not the parallel search. We highlight an involvement of V1 in serial search 300 ms after the onset; conversely, V1 did not contribute to parallel search at delays beyond 100 ms. This study supports the idea that serial search differs from parallel search by the presence of additional cycles of a select-and-focus iterative loop between V1 and higher-level areas.
format Text
id pubmed-3096634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30966342011-05-24 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Attentional Feedback to Area V1 during Serial Visual Search Dugué, Laura Marque, Philippe VanRullen, Rufin PLoS One Research Article Visual search tasks have been used to understand how, where and when attention influences visual processing. Current theories suggest the involvement of a high-level “saliency map” that selects a candidate location to focus attentional resources. For a parallel (or “pop-out”) task, the first chosen location is systematically the target, but for a serial (or “difficult”) task, the system may cycle on a few distractors before finally focusing on the target. This implies that attentional effects upon early visual areas, involving feedback from higher areas, should be visible at longer latencies during serial search. A previous study from Juan & Walsh (2003) had used Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to support this conclusion; however, only a few post-stimulus delays were compared, and no control TMS location was used. Here we applied TMS double-pulses (sub-threshold) to induce a transient inhibition of area V1 at every post-stimulus delay between 100 ms and 500 ms (50 ms steps). The search array was presented either at the location affected by the TMS pulses (previously identified by applying several pulses at supra-threshold intensity to induce phosphene perception), or in the opposite hemifield, which served as a retinotopically-defined control location. Two search tasks were used: a parallel (+ among Ls) and a serial one (T among Ls). TMS specifically impaired the serial, but not the parallel search. We highlight an involvement of V1 in serial search 300 ms after the onset; conversely, V1 did not contribute to parallel search at delays beyond 100 ms. This study supports the idea that serial search differs from parallel search by the presence of additional cycles of a select-and-focus iterative loop between V1 and higher-level areas. Public Library of Science 2011-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3096634/ /pubmed/21611188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019712 Text en Dugué et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dugué, Laura
Marque, Philippe
VanRullen, Rufin
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Attentional Feedback to Area V1 during Serial Visual Search
title Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Attentional Feedback to Area V1 during Serial Visual Search
title_full Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Attentional Feedback to Area V1 during Serial Visual Search
title_fullStr Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Attentional Feedback to Area V1 during Serial Visual Search
title_full_unstemmed Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Attentional Feedback to Area V1 during Serial Visual Search
title_short Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Attentional Feedback to Area V1 during Serial Visual Search
title_sort transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals attentional feedback to area v1 during serial visual search
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21611188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019712
work_keys_str_mv AT duguelaura transcranialmagneticstimulationrevealsattentionalfeedbacktoareav1duringserialvisualsearch
AT marquephilippe transcranialmagneticstimulationrevealsattentionalfeedbacktoareav1duringserialvisualsearch
AT vanrullenrufin transcranialmagneticstimulationrevealsattentionalfeedbacktoareav1duringserialvisualsearch