Cargando…

Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate intra-fraction setup variability in hypo-fractionated cranial and body radiotherapy; this is achieved by means of integrated infrared optical localization and stereoscopic kV X-ray imaging. METHOD AND MATERIALS: We analyzed data coming from 87...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spadea, Maria Francesca, Tagaste, Barbara, Riboldi, Marco, Preve, Eleonora, Alterio, Daniela, Piperno, Gaia, Garibaldi, Cristina, Orecchia, Roberto, Pedotti, Antonio, Baroni, Guido
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-38
_version_ 1782203765054504960
author Spadea, Maria Francesca
Tagaste, Barbara
Riboldi, Marco
Preve, Eleonora
Alterio, Daniela
Piperno, Gaia
Garibaldi, Cristina
Orecchia, Roberto
Pedotti, Antonio
Baroni, Guido
author_facet Spadea, Maria Francesca
Tagaste, Barbara
Riboldi, Marco
Preve, Eleonora
Alterio, Daniela
Piperno, Gaia
Garibaldi, Cristina
Orecchia, Roberto
Pedotti, Antonio
Baroni, Guido
author_sort Spadea, Maria Francesca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate intra-fraction setup variability in hypo-fractionated cranial and body radiotherapy; this is achieved by means of integrated infrared optical localization and stereoscopic kV X-ray imaging. METHOD AND MATERIALS: We analyzed data coming from 87 patients treated with hypo-fractionated radiotherapy at cranial and extra-cranial sites. Patient setup was realized through the ExacTrac X-ray 6D system (BrainLAB, Germany), consisting of 2 infrared TV cameras for external fiducial localization and X-ray imaging in double projection for image registration. Before irradiation, patients were pre-aligned relying on optical marker localization. Patient position was refined through the automatic matching of X-ray images to digitally reconstructed radiographs, providing 6 corrective parameters that were automatically applied using a robotic couch. Infrared patient localization and X-ray imaging were performed at the end of treatment, thus providing independent measures of intra-fraction motion. RESULTS: According to optical measurements, the size of intra-fraction motion was (median ± quartile) 0.3 ± 0.3 mm, 0.6 ± 0.6 mm, 0.7 ± 0.6 mm for cranial, abdominal and lung patients, respectively. X-ray image registration estimated larger intra-fraction motion, equal to 0.9 ± 0.8 mm, 1.3 ± 1.2 mm, 1.8 ± 2.2 mm, correspondingly. CONCLUSION: Optical tracking highlighted negligible intra-fraction motion at both cranial and extra-cranial sites. The larger motion detected by X-ray image registration showed significant inter-patient variability, in contrast to infrared optical tracking measurement. Infrared localization is put forward as the optimal strategy to monitor intra-fraction motion, featuring robustness, flexibility and less invasivity with respect to X-ray based techniques.
format Text
id pubmed-3096920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30969202011-05-19 Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population Spadea, Maria Francesca Tagaste, Barbara Riboldi, Marco Preve, Eleonora Alterio, Daniela Piperno, Gaia Garibaldi, Cristina Orecchia, Roberto Pedotti, Antonio Baroni, Guido Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate intra-fraction setup variability in hypo-fractionated cranial and body radiotherapy; this is achieved by means of integrated infrared optical localization and stereoscopic kV X-ray imaging. METHOD AND MATERIALS: We analyzed data coming from 87 patients treated with hypo-fractionated radiotherapy at cranial and extra-cranial sites. Patient setup was realized through the ExacTrac X-ray 6D system (BrainLAB, Germany), consisting of 2 infrared TV cameras for external fiducial localization and X-ray imaging in double projection for image registration. Before irradiation, patients were pre-aligned relying on optical marker localization. Patient position was refined through the automatic matching of X-ray images to digitally reconstructed radiographs, providing 6 corrective parameters that were automatically applied using a robotic couch. Infrared patient localization and X-ray imaging were performed at the end of treatment, thus providing independent measures of intra-fraction motion. RESULTS: According to optical measurements, the size of intra-fraction motion was (median ± quartile) 0.3 ± 0.3 mm, 0.6 ± 0.6 mm, 0.7 ± 0.6 mm for cranial, abdominal and lung patients, respectively. X-ray image registration estimated larger intra-fraction motion, equal to 0.9 ± 0.8 mm, 1.3 ± 1.2 mm, 1.8 ± 2.2 mm, correspondingly. CONCLUSION: Optical tracking highlighted negligible intra-fraction motion at both cranial and extra-cranial sites. The larger motion detected by X-ray image registration showed significant inter-patient variability, in contrast to infrared optical tracking measurement. Infrared localization is put forward as the optimal strategy to monitor intra-fraction motion, featuring robustness, flexibility and less invasivity with respect to X-ray based techniques. BioMed Central 2011-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3096920/ /pubmed/21496255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-38 Text en Copyright ©2011 Spadea et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Spadea, Maria Francesca
Tagaste, Barbara
Riboldi, Marco
Preve, Eleonora
Alterio, Daniela
Piperno, Gaia
Garibaldi, Cristina
Orecchia, Roberto
Pedotti, Antonio
Baroni, Guido
Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population
title Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population
title_full Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population
title_fullStr Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population
title_full_unstemmed Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population
title_short Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population
title_sort intra-fraction setup variability: ir optical localization vs. x-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-38
work_keys_str_mv AT spadeamariafrancesca intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation
AT tagastebarbara intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation
AT riboldimarco intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation
AT preveeleonora intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation
AT alteriodaniela intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation
AT pipernogaia intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation
AT garibaldicristina intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation
AT orecchiaroberto intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation
AT pedottiantonio intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation
AT baroniguido intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation