Cargando…
Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate intra-fraction setup variability in hypo-fractionated cranial and body radiotherapy; this is achieved by means of integrated infrared optical localization and stereoscopic kV X-ray imaging. METHOD AND MATERIALS: We analyzed data coming from 87...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-38 |
_version_ | 1782203765054504960 |
---|---|
author | Spadea, Maria Francesca Tagaste, Barbara Riboldi, Marco Preve, Eleonora Alterio, Daniela Piperno, Gaia Garibaldi, Cristina Orecchia, Roberto Pedotti, Antonio Baroni, Guido |
author_facet | Spadea, Maria Francesca Tagaste, Barbara Riboldi, Marco Preve, Eleonora Alterio, Daniela Piperno, Gaia Garibaldi, Cristina Orecchia, Roberto Pedotti, Antonio Baroni, Guido |
author_sort | Spadea, Maria Francesca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate intra-fraction setup variability in hypo-fractionated cranial and body radiotherapy; this is achieved by means of integrated infrared optical localization and stereoscopic kV X-ray imaging. METHOD AND MATERIALS: We analyzed data coming from 87 patients treated with hypo-fractionated radiotherapy at cranial and extra-cranial sites. Patient setup was realized through the ExacTrac X-ray 6D system (BrainLAB, Germany), consisting of 2 infrared TV cameras for external fiducial localization and X-ray imaging in double projection for image registration. Before irradiation, patients were pre-aligned relying on optical marker localization. Patient position was refined through the automatic matching of X-ray images to digitally reconstructed radiographs, providing 6 corrective parameters that were automatically applied using a robotic couch. Infrared patient localization and X-ray imaging were performed at the end of treatment, thus providing independent measures of intra-fraction motion. RESULTS: According to optical measurements, the size of intra-fraction motion was (median ± quartile) 0.3 ± 0.3 mm, 0.6 ± 0.6 mm, 0.7 ± 0.6 mm for cranial, abdominal and lung patients, respectively. X-ray image registration estimated larger intra-fraction motion, equal to 0.9 ± 0.8 mm, 1.3 ± 1.2 mm, 1.8 ± 2.2 mm, correspondingly. CONCLUSION: Optical tracking highlighted negligible intra-fraction motion at both cranial and extra-cranial sites. The larger motion detected by X-ray image registration showed significant inter-patient variability, in contrast to infrared optical tracking measurement. Infrared localization is put forward as the optimal strategy to monitor intra-fraction motion, featuring robustness, flexibility and less invasivity with respect to X-ray based techniques. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3096920 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30969202011-05-19 Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population Spadea, Maria Francesca Tagaste, Barbara Riboldi, Marco Preve, Eleonora Alterio, Daniela Piperno, Gaia Garibaldi, Cristina Orecchia, Roberto Pedotti, Antonio Baroni, Guido Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate intra-fraction setup variability in hypo-fractionated cranial and body radiotherapy; this is achieved by means of integrated infrared optical localization and stereoscopic kV X-ray imaging. METHOD AND MATERIALS: We analyzed data coming from 87 patients treated with hypo-fractionated radiotherapy at cranial and extra-cranial sites. Patient setup was realized through the ExacTrac X-ray 6D system (BrainLAB, Germany), consisting of 2 infrared TV cameras for external fiducial localization and X-ray imaging in double projection for image registration. Before irradiation, patients were pre-aligned relying on optical marker localization. Patient position was refined through the automatic matching of X-ray images to digitally reconstructed radiographs, providing 6 corrective parameters that were automatically applied using a robotic couch. Infrared patient localization and X-ray imaging were performed at the end of treatment, thus providing independent measures of intra-fraction motion. RESULTS: According to optical measurements, the size of intra-fraction motion was (median ± quartile) 0.3 ± 0.3 mm, 0.6 ± 0.6 mm, 0.7 ± 0.6 mm for cranial, abdominal and lung patients, respectively. X-ray image registration estimated larger intra-fraction motion, equal to 0.9 ± 0.8 mm, 1.3 ± 1.2 mm, 1.8 ± 2.2 mm, correspondingly. CONCLUSION: Optical tracking highlighted negligible intra-fraction motion at both cranial and extra-cranial sites. The larger motion detected by X-ray image registration showed significant inter-patient variability, in contrast to infrared optical tracking measurement. Infrared localization is put forward as the optimal strategy to monitor intra-fraction motion, featuring robustness, flexibility and less invasivity with respect to X-ray based techniques. BioMed Central 2011-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3096920/ /pubmed/21496255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-38 Text en Copyright ©2011 Spadea et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Spadea, Maria Francesca Tagaste, Barbara Riboldi, Marco Preve, Eleonora Alterio, Daniela Piperno, Gaia Garibaldi, Cristina Orecchia, Roberto Pedotti, Antonio Baroni, Guido Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population |
title | Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population |
title_full | Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population |
title_fullStr | Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population |
title_full_unstemmed | Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population |
title_short | Intra-fraction setup variability: IR optical localization vs. X-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population |
title_sort | intra-fraction setup variability: ir optical localization vs. x-ray imaging in a hypofractionated patient population |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-38 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spadeamariafrancesca intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation AT tagastebarbara intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation AT riboldimarco intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation AT preveeleonora intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation AT alteriodaniela intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation AT pipernogaia intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation AT garibaldicristina intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation AT orecchiaroberto intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation AT pedottiantonio intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation AT baroniguido intrafractionsetupvariabilityiropticallocalizationvsxrayimaginginahypofractionatedpatientpopulation |