Cargando…
The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence of residual or recurrent disease after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix. METHODS: Medical records of 99 patients with a histologically diagnosis of AIS of the uterine cervix by conization between 1991 and 2008 were reviewed retro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21607092 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2011.22.1.25 |
_version_ | 1782203811957309440 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Mi-La Hahn, Ho-Suap Lim, Kyung-Taek Lee, Ki-Heon Kim, Hy-Sook Hong, Sung-Ran Kim, Tae-Jin |
author_facet | Kim, Mi-La Hahn, Ho-Suap Lim, Kyung-Taek Lee, Ki-Heon Kim, Hy-Sook Hong, Sung-Ran Kim, Tae-Jin |
author_sort | Kim, Mi-La |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence of residual or recurrent disease after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix. METHODS: Medical records of 99 patients with a histologically diagnosis of AIS of the uterine cervix by conization between 1991 and 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Seventy eight of 99 patients (78.8%) had negative and 18 (18.2%) had positive resection margins of the conization specimen, and 3 (3.0%) had unknown margin status. Of the 78 patients with negative margins, 45 underwent subsequent hysterectomy and residual AIS were present in 4.4% (2/45) of patients. Ten of the 18 patients with positive margins received subsequent hysterectomy and 3 patients (30%) had residual AIS. Twenty-eight patients had conservative treatment and during the median follow-up time of 23.5 months (range, 7 to 124 months), only one patient (3.6%) had recurrent AIS and was treated with a simple hysterectomy. Eight patients became pregnant after conization, 4 of them delivered healthy babies, one had a spontaneous abortion and 3 were ongoing pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Patients with positive resection margins after conization for AIS of the uterine cervix are significantly more likely to have residual disease. However, negative resection margin carries a lower risk for residual AIS, therefore conservative management with careful surveillance seems to be feasible in women who wish to preserve their fertility. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3097330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30973302011-05-23 The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix Kim, Mi-La Hahn, Ho-Suap Lim, Kyung-Taek Lee, Ki-Heon Kim, Hy-Sook Hong, Sung-Ran Kim, Tae-Jin J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence of residual or recurrent disease after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix. METHODS: Medical records of 99 patients with a histologically diagnosis of AIS of the uterine cervix by conization between 1991 and 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Seventy eight of 99 patients (78.8%) had negative and 18 (18.2%) had positive resection margins of the conization specimen, and 3 (3.0%) had unknown margin status. Of the 78 patients with negative margins, 45 underwent subsequent hysterectomy and residual AIS were present in 4.4% (2/45) of patients. Ten of the 18 patients with positive margins received subsequent hysterectomy and 3 patients (30%) had residual AIS. Twenty-eight patients had conservative treatment and during the median follow-up time of 23.5 months (range, 7 to 124 months), only one patient (3.6%) had recurrent AIS and was treated with a simple hysterectomy. Eight patients became pregnant after conization, 4 of them delivered healthy babies, one had a spontaneous abortion and 3 were ongoing pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Patients with positive resection margins after conization for AIS of the uterine cervix are significantly more likely to have residual disease. However, negative resection margin carries a lower risk for residual AIS, therefore conservative management with careful surveillance seems to be feasible in women who wish to preserve their fertility. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy 2011-03-31 2011-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3097330/ /pubmed/21607092 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2011.22.1.25 Text en Copyright © 2011. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Mi-La Hahn, Ho-Suap Lim, Kyung-Taek Lee, Ki-Heon Kim, Hy-Sook Hong, Sung-Ran Kim, Tae-Jin The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix |
title | The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix |
title_full | The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix |
title_fullStr | The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix |
title_full_unstemmed | The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix |
title_short | The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix |
title_sort | safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21607092 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2011.22.1.25 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimmila thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix AT hahnhosuap thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix AT limkyungtaek thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix AT leekiheon thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix AT kimhysook thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix AT hongsungran thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix AT kimtaejin thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix AT kimmila safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix AT hahnhosuap safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix AT limkyungtaek safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix AT leekiheon safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix AT kimhysook safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix AT hongsungran safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix AT kimtaejin safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix |