Cargando…

The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence of residual or recurrent disease after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix. METHODS: Medical records of 99 patients with a histologically diagnosis of AIS of the uterine cervix by conization between 1991 and 2008 were reviewed retro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Mi-La, Hahn, Ho-Suap, Lim, Kyung-Taek, Lee, Ki-Heon, Kim, Hy-Sook, Hong, Sung-Ran, Kim, Tae-Jin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21607092
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2011.22.1.25
_version_ 1782203811957309440
author Kim, Mi-La
Hahn, Ho-Suap
Lim, Kyung-Taek
Lee, Ki-Heon
Kim, Hy-Sook
Hong, Sung-Ran
Kim, Tae-Jin
author_facet Kim, Mi-La
Hahn, Ho-Suap
Lim, Kyung-Taek
Lee, Ki-Heon
Kim, Hy-Sook
Hong, Sung-Ran
Kim, Tae-Jin
author_sort Kim, Mi-La
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence of residual or recurrent disease after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix. METHODS: Medical records of 99 patients with a histologically diagnosis of AIS of the uterine cervix by conization between 1991 and 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Seventy eight of 99 patients (78.8%) had negative and 18 (18.2%) had positive resection margins of the conization specimen, and 3 (3.0%) had unknown margin status. Of the 78 patients with negative margins, 45 underwent subsequent hysterectomy and residual AIS were present in 4.4% (2/45) of patients. Ten of the 18 patients with positive margins received subsequent hysterectomy and 3 patients (30%) had residual AIS. Twenty-eight patients had conservative treatment and during the median follow-up time of 23.5 months (range, 7 to 124 months), only one patient (3.6%) had recurrent AIS and was treated with a simple hysterectomy. Eight patients became pregnant after conization, 4 of them delivered healthy babies, one had a spontaneous abortion and 3 were ongoing pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Patients with positive resection margins after conization for AIS of the uterine cervix are significantly more likely to have residual disease. However, negative resection margin carries a lower risk for residual AIS, therefore conservative management with careful surveillance seems to be feasible in women who wish to preserve their fertility.
format Text
id pubmed-3097330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30973302011-05-23 The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix Kim, Mi-La Hahn, Ho-Suap Lim, Kyung-Taek Lee, Ki-Heon Kim, Hy-Sook Hong, Sung-Ran Kim, Tae-Jin J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence of residual or recurrent disease after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix. METHODS: Medical records of 99 patients with a histologically diagnosis of AIS of the uterine cervix by conization between 1991 and 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Seventy eight of 99 patients (78.8%) had negative and 18 (18.2%) had positive resection margins of the conization specimen, and 3 (3.0%) had unknown margin status. Of the 78 patients with negative margins, 45 underwent subsequent hysterectomy and residual AIS were present in 4.4% (2/45) of patients. Ten of the 18 patients with positive margins received subsequent hysterectomy and 3 patients (30%) had residual AIS. Twenty-eight patients had conservative treatment and during the median follow-up time of 23.5 months (range, 7 to 124 months), only one patient (3.6%) had recurrent AIS and was treated with a simple hysterectomy. Eight patients became pregnant after conization, 4 of them delivered healthy babies, one had a spontaneous abortion and 3 were ongoing pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Patients with positive resection margins after conization for AIS of the uterine cervix are significantly more likely to have residual disease. However, negative resection margin carries a lower risk for residual AIS, therefore conservative management with careful surveillance seems to be feasible in women who wish to preserve their fertility. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy 2011-03-31 2011-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3097330/ /pubmed/21607092 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2011.22.1.25 Text en Copyright © 2011. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Mi-La
Hahn, Ho-Suap
Lim, Kyung-Taek
Lee, Ki-Heon
Kim, Hy-Sook
Hong, Sung-Ran
Kim, Tae-Jin
The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix
title The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix
title_full The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix
title_fullStr The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix
title_full_unstemmed The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix
title_short The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix
title_sort safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21607092
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2011.22.1.25
work_keys_str_mv AT kimmila thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix
AT hahnhosuap thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix
AT limkyungtaek thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix
AT leekiheon thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix
AT kimhysook thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix
AT hongsungran thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix
AT kimtaejin thesafetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix
AT kimmila safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix
AT hahnhosuap safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix
AT limkyungtaek safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix
AT leekiheon safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix
AT kimhysook safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix
AT hongsungran safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix
AT kimtaejin safetyofconizationinthemanagementofadenocarcinomainsituoftheuterinecervix