Cargando…
Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a challenge because the clinical signs and symptoms lack both sensitivity and specificity and the selection of microbiologic diagnostic procedure is still a matter of debate. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To study the role of various b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21633541 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.78218 |
_version_ | 1782203832818728960 |
---|---|
author | Khilnani, G. C. Arafath, T. K. Luqman Hadda, Vijay Kapil, Arti Sood, Seema Sharma, S. K. |
author_facet | Khilnani, G. C. Arafath, T. K. Luqman Hadda, Vijay Kapil, Arti Sood, Seema Sharma, S. K. |
author_sort | Khilnani, G. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a challenge because the clinical signs and symptoms lack both sensitivity and specificity and the selection of microbiologic diagnostic procedure is still a matter of debate. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To study the role of various bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic diagnostic techniques for diagnosis of VAP. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This prospective comparative study was conducted in a medical ICU of a tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients, clinically diagnosed with VAP, were evaluated by bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic procedures for diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of various bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques were calculated, taking clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) of ≥6 as reference standard. RESULTS: Our study has shown that for the diagnosis of VAP, bronchoscopic brush had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 94.9% [confidence interval (CI): 70.6–99.7], 57.1% (CI: 13.4–86.1), 85% (CI: 61.1–96) and 80% (CI: 21.9–98.7), respectively. Bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 77.8% (CI: 51.9–92.6), 71.8% (CI: 24.1–94), 87.3% (CI: 60.4–97.8) and 55.5% (CI: 17.4–82.6), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for non–bronchoscopic BAL (NBAL) were 83.3% (CI: 57.7–95.6), 71.43% (CI: 24.1–94), 88.2% (CI: 62.3–97.4) and 62.5% (CI: 20.2–88.2), respectively. Endotracheal aspirate (ETA) yield was only 52% and showed poor concordance with BAL (κ-0.351; P-0.064) and NBAL (k-0.272; P-0.161). There was a good microbiologic concordance among different bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic distal airway sampling techniques. CONCLUSION: NBAL is an inexpensive, easy, and useful technique for microbiologic diagnosis of VAP. Our findings, if verified, might simplify the approach for the diagnosis of VAP. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3097537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30975372011-06-01 Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia Khilnani, G. C. Arafath, T. K. Luqman Hadda, Vijay Kapil, Arti Sood, Seema Sharma, S. K. Indian J Crit Care Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a challenge because the clinical signs and symptoms lack both sensitivity and specificity and the selection of microbiologic diagnostic procedure is still a matter of debate. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To study the role of various bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic diagnostic techniques for diagnosis of VAP. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This prospective comparative study was conducted in a medical ICU of a tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients, clinically diagnosed with VAP, were evaluated by bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic procedures for diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of various bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques were calculated, taking clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) of ≥6 as reference standard. RESULTS: Our study has shown that for the diagnosis of VAP, bronchoscopic brush had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 94.9% [confidence interval (CI): 70.6–99.7], 57.1% (CI: 13.4–86.1), 85% (CI: 61.1–96) and 80% (CI: 21.9–98.7), respectively. Bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 77.8% (CI: 51.9–92.6), 71.8% (CI: 24.1–94), 87.3% (CI: 60.4–97.8) and 55.5% (CI: 17.4–82.6), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for non–bronchoscopic BAL (NBAL) were 83.3% (CI: 57.7–95.6), 71.43% (CI: 24.1–94), 88.2% (CI: 62.3–97.4) and 62.5% (CI: 20.2–88.2), respectively. Endotracheal aspirate (ETA) yield was only 52% and showed poor concordance with BAL (κ-0.351; P-0.064) and NBAL (k-0.272; P-0.161). There was a good microbiologic concordance among different bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic distal airway sampling techniques. CONCLUSION: NBAL is an inexpensive, easy, and useful technique for microbiologic diagnosis of VAP. Our findings, if verified, might simplify the approach for the diagnosis of VAP. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3097537/ /pubmed/21633541 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.78218 Text en © Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Khilnani, G. C. Arafath, T. K. Luqman Hadda, Vijay Kapil, Arti Sood, Seema Sharma, S. K. Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia |
title | Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia |
title_full | Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia |
title_fullStr | Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia |
title_short | Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia |
title_sort | comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21633541 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.78218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khilnanigc comparisonofbronchoscopicandnonbronchoscopictechniquesfordiagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT arafathtkluqman comparisonofbronchoscopicandnonbronchoscopictechniquesfordiagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT haddavijay comparisonofbronchoscopicandnonbronchoscopictechniquesfordiagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT kapilarti comparisonofbronchoscopicandnonbronchoscopictechniquesfordiagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT soodseema comparisonofbronchoscopicandnonbronchoscopictechniquesfordiagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia AT sharmask comparisonofbronchoscopicandnonbronchoscopictechniquesfordiagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia |