Cargando…

Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a challenge because the clinical signs and symptoms lack both sensitivity and specificity and the selection of microbiologic diagnostic procedure is still a matter of debate. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To study the role of various b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khilnani, G. C., Arafath, T. K. Luqman, Hadda, Vijay, Kapil, Arti, Sood, Seema, Sharma, S. K.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21633541
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.78218
_version_ 1782203832818728960
author Khilnani, G. C.
Arafath, T. K. Luqman
Hadda, Vijay
Kapil, Arti
Sood, Seema
Sharma, S. K.
author_facet Khilnani, G. C.
Arafath, T. K. Luqman
Hadda, Vijay
Kapil, Arti
Sood, Seema
Sharma, S. K.
author_sort Khilnani, G. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a challenge because the clinical signs and symptoms lack both sensitivity and specificity and the selection of microbiologic diagnostic procedure is still a matter of debate. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To study the role of various bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic diagnostic techniques for diagnosis of VAP. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This prospective comparative study was conducted in a medical ICU of a tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients, clinically diagnosed with VAP, were evaluated by bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic procedures for diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of various bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques were calculated, taking clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) of ≥6 as reference standard. RESULTS: Our study has shown that for the diagnosis of VAP, bronchoscopic brush had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 94.9% [confidence interval (CI): 70.6–99.7], 57.1% (CI: 13.4–86.1), 85% (CI: 61.1–96) and 80% (CI: 21.9–98.7), respectively. Bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 77.8% (CI: 51.9–92.6), 71.8% (CI: 24.1–94), 87.3% (CI: 60.4–97.8) and 55.5% (CI: 17.4–82.6), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for non–bronchoscopic BAL (NBAL) were 83.3% (CI: 57.7–95.6), 71.43% (CI: 24.1–94), 88.2% (CI: 62.3–97.4) and 62.5% (CI: 20.2–88.2), respectively. Endotracheal aspirate (ETA) yield was only 52% and showed poor concordance with BAL (κ-0.351; P-0.064) and NBAL (k-0.272; P-0.161). There was a good microbiologic concordance among different bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic distal airway sampling techniques. CONCLUSION: NBAL is an inexpensive, easy, and useful technique for microbiologic diagnosis of VAP. Our findings, if verified, might simplify the approach for the diagnosis of VAP.
format Text
id pubmed-3097537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30975372011-06-01 Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia Khilnani, G. C. Arafath, T. K. Luqman Hadda, Vijay Kapil, Arti Sood, Seema Sharma, S. K. Indian J Crit Care Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a challenge because the clinical signs and symptoms lack both sensitivity and specificity and the selection of microbiologic diagnostic procedure is still a matter of debate. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To study the role of various bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic diagnostic techniques for diagnosis of VAP. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This prospective comparative study was conducted in a medical ICU of a tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients, clinically diagnosed with VAP, were evaluated by bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic procedures for diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of various bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques were calculated, taking clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) of ≥6 as reference standard. RESULTS: Our study has shown that for the diagnosis of VAP, bronchoscopic brush had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 94.9% [confidence interval (CI): 70.6–99.7], 57.1% (CI: 13.4–86.1), 85% (CI: 61.1–96) and 80% (CI: 21.9–98.7), respectively. Bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 77.8% (CI: 51.9–92.6), 71.8% (CI: 24.1–94), 87.3% (CI: 60.4–97.8) and 55.5% (CI: 17.4–82.6), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for non–bronchoscopic BAL (NBAL) were 83.3% (CI: 57.7–95.6), 71.43% (CI: 24.1–94), 88.2% (CI: 62.3–97.4) and 62.5% (CI: 20.2–88.2), respectively. Endotracheal aspirate (ETA) yield was only 52% and showed poor concordance with BAL (κ-0.351; P-0.064) and NBAL (k-0.272; P-0.161). There was a good microbiologic concordance among different bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic distal airway sampling techniques. CONCLUSION: NBAL is an inexpensive, easy, and useful technique for microbiologic diagnosis of VAP. Our findings, if verified, might simplify the approach for the diagnosis of VAP. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3097537/ /pubmed/21633541 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.78218 Text en © Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khilnani, G. C.
Arafath, T. K. Luqman
Hadda, Vijay
Kapil, Arti
Sood, Seema
Sharma, S. K.
Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia
title Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia
title_full Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia
title_fullStr Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia
title_short Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia
title_sort comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21633541
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.78218
work_keys_str_mv AT khilnanigc comparisonofbronchoscopicandnonbronchoscopictechniquesfordiagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT arafathtkluqman comparisonofbronchoscopicandnonbronchoscopictechniquesfordiagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT haddavijay comparisonofbronchoscopicandnonbronchoscopictechniquesfordiagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT kapilarti comparisonofbronchoscopicandnonbronchoscopictechniquesfordiagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT soodseema comparisonofbronchoscopicandnonbronchoscopictechniquesfordiagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT sharmask comparisonofbronchoscopicandnonbronchoscopictechniquesfordiagnosisofventilatorassociatedpneumonia