Cargando…

The importance of radiation quality for optimisation in radiology

Selection of the appropriate radiation quality is an important aspect of optimisation for every clinical imaging task in radiology, since it affects both image quality and patient dose. Spreadsheet calculations of attenuation and absorption have been applied to basic imaging tasks to provide an asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Martin, CJ
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21614278
http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.3.2.e38
_version_ 1782203861606334464
author Martin, CJ
author_facet Martin, CJ
author_sort Martin, CJ
collection PubMed
description Selection of the appropriate radiation quality is an important aspect of optimisation for every clinical imaging task in radiology, since it affects both image quality and patient dose. Spreadsheet calculations of attenuation and absorption have been applied to basic imaging tasks to provide an assessment of imaging performance for a selection of phosphors used in radiology systems. Contrast, which is an important component of image quality affected by radiation quality, has been assessed in terms of the contrast to noise ratio (CNR) for a variety of X-ray beams. Both CNR and patient dose fall with tube potential, and selection of the best option is a compromise that will provide an adequate level of image quality with as low a radiation dose as practicable. It is important that systems are set up to match the response of the imaging phosphor, as there are significant differences between phosphors. For example, the sensitivity of barium fluorohalides used in computed radiography declines at higher tube potentials, whereas that of gadolinium oxysulphide used in rare earth screens increases. Addition of 0.2 mm copper filters, which can reduce patient entrance surface dose by 50%, may be advantageous for many applications in radiography and fluoroscopy. The disadvantage of adding copper is that tube output levels have to be increased. Application of simple calculations of the type employed here could prove useful for investigating and assessing the implications of potential changes in X-ray beam quality prior to implementation of new techniques.
format Text
id pubmed-3097659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30976592011-05-24 The importance of radiation quality for optimisation in radiology Martin, CJ Biomed Imaging Interv J Commentary Selection of the appropriate radiation quality is an important aspect of optimisation for every clinical imaging task in radiology, since it affects both image quality and patient dose. Spreadsheet calculations of attenuation and absorption have been applied to basic imaging tasks to provide an assessment of imaging performance for a selection of phosphors used in radiology systems. Contrast, which is an important component of image quality affected by radiation quality, has been assessed in terms of the contrast to noise ratio (CNR) for a variety of X-ray beams. Both CNR and patient dose fall with tube potential, and selection of the best option is a compromise that will provide an adequate level of image quality with as low a radiation dose as practicable. It is important that systems are set up to match the response of the imaging phosphor, as there are significant differences between phosphors. For example, the sensitivity of barium fluorohalides used in computed radiography declines at higher tube potentials, whereas that of gadolinium oxysulphide used in rare earth screens increases. Addition of 0.2 mm copper filters, which can reduce patient entrance surface dose by 50%, may be advantageous for many applications in radiography and fluoroscopy. The disadvantage of adding copper is that tube output levels have to be increased. Application of simple calculations of the type employed here could prove useful for investigating and assessing the implications of potential changes in X-ray beam quality prior to implementation of new techniques. Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia 2007-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3097659/ /pubmed/21614278 http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.3.2.e38 Text en © 2007 Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Martin, CJ
The importance of radiation quality for optimisation in radiology
title The importance of radiation quality for optimisation in radiology
title_full The importance of radiation quality for optimisation in radiology
title_fullStr The importance of radiation quality for optimisation in radiology
title_full_unstemmed The importance of radiation quality for optimisation in radiology
title_short The importance of radiation quality for optimisation in radiology
title_sort importance of radiation quality for optimisation in radiology
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21614278
http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.3.2.e38
work_keys_str_mv AT martincj theimportanceofradiationqualityforoptimisationinradiology
AT martincj importanceofradiationqualityforoptimisationinradiology