Cargando…
United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities
PURPOSE: The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) was enacted in 1992 to set national standards for high-quality mammography, including standards for mammographic X-ray equipment, patient dose, clinical image quality, and related technical parameters. The MQSA also requires minimum qualification...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21614276 http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.3.2.e35 |
_version_ | 1782203861932441600 |
---|---|
author | Spelic, DC Kaczmarek, RV Hilohi, M Belella, S |
author_facet | Spelic, DC Kaczmarek, RV Hilohi, M Belella, S |
author_sort | Spelic, DC |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) was enacted in 1992 to set national standards for high-quality mammography, including standards for mammographic X-ray equipment, patient dose, clinical image quality, and related technical parameters. The MQSA also requires minimum qualifications for radiologic technologists, interpreting physicians and medical physicists, mandates acceptable practices for quality-control, quality-assurance, and requires processes to audit medical outcomes. This paper presents the findings of MQSA inspections of facilities, which characterize significant factors affecting mammography quality in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trained inspectors collected data regarding X-ray technical factors, made exposure measurements for the determination of mean glandular dose (MGD), evaluated image quality, and inspected the quality of the film-processing environment. The average annual facility and total U.S. screening exam workloads were computed using workload data reported by facilities. RESULTS: Mammography facilities have made technical improvements as evidenced by a narrower distribution of doses, higher phantom-film background optical densities associated with higher phantom image-quality scores, and better film processing. It is estimated that approximately 36 million screening mammography exams were conducted in 2006, a rate that is almost triple the exam volume estimated for 1997. Digital mammography (DM) is now in use at approximately 14% (1,191 of 8,834) of MQSA-certified mammography facilities. The results indicate that DM can offer lower dose to the patient while providing comparable or better image quality. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3097660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30976602011-05-24 United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities Spelic, DC Kaczmarek, RV Hilohi, M Belella, S Biomed Imaging Interv J Original Article PURPOSE: The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) was enacted in 1992 to set national standards for high-quality mammography, including standards for mammographic X-ray equipment, patient dose, clinical image quality, and related technical parameters. The MQSA also requires minimum qualifications for radiologic technologists, interpreting physicians and medical physicists, mandates acceptable practices for quality-control, quality-assurance, and requires processes to audit medical outcomes. This paper presents the findings of MQSA inspections of facilities, which characterize significant factors affecting mammography quality in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trained inspectors collected data regarding X-ray technical factors, made exposure measurements for the determination of mean glandular dose (MGD), evaluated image quality, and inspected the quality of the film-processing environment. The average annual facility and total U.S. screening exam workloads were computed using workload data reported by facilities. RESULTS: Mammography facilities have made technical improvements as evidenced by a narrower distribution of doses, higher phantom-film background optical densities associated with higher phantom image-quality scores, and better film processing. It is estimated that approximately 36 million screening mammography exams were conducted in 2006, a rate that is almost triple the exam volume estimated for 1997. Digital mammography (DM) is now in use at approximately 14% (1,191 of 8,834) of MQSA-certified mammography facilities. The results indicate that DM can offer lower dose to the patient while providing comparable or better image quality. Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia 2007-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3097660/ /pubmed/21614276 http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.3.2.e35 Text en © 2007 Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Spelic, DC Kaczmarek, RV Hilohi, M Belella, S United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities |
title | United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities |
title_full | United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities |
title_fullStr | United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities |
title_full_unstemmed | United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities |
title_short | United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities |
title_sort | united states radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21614276 http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.3.2.e35 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spelicdc unitedstatesradiologicalhealthactivitiesinspectionresultsofmammographyfacilities AT kaczmarekrv unitedstatesradiologicalhealthactivitiesinspectionresultsofmammographyfacilities AT hilohim unitedstatesradiologicalhealthactivitiesinspectionresultsofmammographyfacilities AT belellas unitedstatesradiologicalhealthactivitiesinspectionresultsofmammographyfacilities |