Cargando…

United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities

PURPOSE: The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) was enacted in 1992 to set national standards for high-quality mammography, including standards for mammographic X-ray equipment, patient dose, clinical image quality, and related technical parameters. The MQSA also requires minimum qualification...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spelic, DC, Kaczmarek, RV, Hilohi, M, Belella, S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21614276
http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.3.2.e35
_version_ 1782203861932441600
author Spelic, DC
Kaczmarek, RV
Hilohi, M
Belella, S
author_facet Spelic, DC
Kaczmarek, RV
Hilohi, M
Belella, S
author_sort Spelic, DC
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) was enacted in 1992 to set national standards for high-quality mammography, including standards for mammographic X-ray equipment, patient dose, clinical image quality, and related technical parameters. The MQSA also requires minimum qualifications for radiologic technologists, interpreting physicians and medical physicists, mandates acceptable practices for quality-control, quality-assurance, and requires processes to audit medical outcomes. This paper presents the findings of MQSA inspections of facilities, which characterize significant factors affecting mammography quality in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trained inspectors collected data regarding X-ray technical factors, made exposure measurements for the determination of mean glandular dose (MGD), evaluated image quality, and inspected the quality of the film-processing environment. The average annual facility and total U.S. screening exam workloads were computed using workload data reported by facilities. RESULTS: Mammography facilities have made technical improvements as evidenced by a narrower distribution of doses, higher phantom-film background optical densities associated with higher phantom image-quality scores, and better film processing. It is estimated that approximately 36 million screening mammography exams were conducted in 2006, a rate that is almost triple the exam volume estimated for 1997. Digital mammography (DM) is now in use at approximately 14% (1,191 of 8,834) of MQSA-certified mammography facilities. The results indicate that DM can offer lower dose to the patient while providing comparable or better image quality.
format Text
id pubmed-3097660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30976602011-05-24 United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities Spelic, DC Kaczmarek, RV Hilohi, M Belella, S Biomed Imaging Interv J Original Article PURPOSE: The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) was enacted in 1992 to set national standards for high-quality mammography, including standards for mammographic X-ray equipment, patient dose, clinical image quality, and related technical parameters. The MQSA also requires minimum qualifications for radiologic technologists, interpreting physicians and medical physicists, mandates acceptable practices for quality-control, quality-assurance, and requires processes to audit medical outcomes. This paper presents the findings of MQSA inspections of facilities, which characterize significant factors affecting mammography quality in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trained inspectors collected data regarding X-ray technical factors, made exposure measurements for the determination of mean glandular dose (MGD), evaluated image quality, and inspected the quality of the film-processing environment. The average annual facility and total U.S. screening exam workloads were computed using workload data reported by facilities. RESULTS: Mammography facilities have made technical improvements as evidenced by a narrower distribution of doses, higher phantom-film background optical densities associated with higher phantom image-quality scores, and better film processing. It is estimated that approximately 36 million screening mammography exams were conducted in 2006, a rate that is almost triple the exam volume estimated for 1997. Digital mammography (DM) is now in use at approximately 14% (1,191 of 8,834) of MQSA-certified mammography facilities. The results indicate that DM can offer lower dose to the patient while providing comparable or better image quality. Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia 2007-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3097660/ /pubmed/21614276 http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.3.2.e35 Text en © 2007 Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Spelic, DC
Kaczmarek, RV
Hilohi, M
Belella, S
United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities
title United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities
title_full United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities
title_fullStr United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities
title_full_unstemmed United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities
title_short United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities
title_sort united states radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21614276
http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.3.2.e35
work_keys_str_mv AT spelicdc unitedstatesradiologicalhealthactivitiesinspectionresultsofmammographyfacilities
AT kaczmarekrv unitedstatesradiologicalhealthactivitiesinspectionresultsofmammographyfacilities
AT hilohim unitedstatesradiologicalhealthactivitiesinspectionresultsofmammographyfacilities
AT belellas unitedstatesradiologicalhealthactivitiesinspectionresultsofmammographyfacilities