Cargando…

Budgeting for PACS

There are a number of models for the acquisition of digital image management systems. The specific details for development of a budget for a PACS/RIS acquisition will depend upon the acquisition model – although there are similarities in the overarching principles and general information, particular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sim, LH
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21611017
http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.4.4.e32
_version_ 1782203881885794304
author Sim, LH
author_facet Sim, LH
author_sort Sim, LH
collection PubMed
description There are a number of models for the acquisition of digital image management systems. The specific details for development of a budget for a PACS/RIS acquisition will depend upon the acquisition model – although there are similarities in the overarching principles and general information, particularly concerning the radiology service requirements that will drive budget considerations. While budgeting for PACS/RIS should follow the same principles as budgeting for any new technology, it is important to understand how far the implementation of digital image management systems can reach in a healthcare setting. Accurate identification of those elements of the healthcare service that will be affected by a PACS/RIS implementation is a critical component of successful budget formation and of the success of any business case and subsequent project that relies on those budget estimates. A budget for a PACS/RIS capital acquisition project should contain capital and recurrent elements. The capital is associated with the acquisition of the system in a purchase model and capital budget may also be required for upgrade – depending upon a facility’s financial management processes. The recurrent (or operational) cost component for the PACS/RIS is associated with maintaining the system(s) in a sustainable operational state. It is also important to consider the service efficiencies, cost savings and service quality improvements that PACS/RIS can generate and include these factors into the economic analysis of any proposal for a PACS/RIS project.
format Text
id pubmed-3097744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30977442011-05-24 Budgeting for PACS Sim, LH Biomed Imaging Interv J Review Article There are a number of models for the acquisition of digital image management systems. The specific details for development of a budget for a PACS/RIS acquisition will depend upon the acquisition model – although there are similarities in the overarching principles and general information, particularly concerning the radiology service requirements that will drive budget considerations. While budgeting for PACS/RIS should follow the same principles as budgeting for any new technology, it is important to understand how far the implementation of digital image management systems can reach in a healthcare setting. Accurate identification of those elements of the healthcare service that will be affected by a PACS/RIS implementation is a critical component of successful budget formation and of the success of any business case and subsequent project that relies on those budget estimates. A budget for a PACS/RIS capital acquisition project should contain capital and recurrent elements. The capital is associated with the acquisition of the system in a purchase model and capital budget may also be required for upgrade – depending upon a facility’s financial management processes. The recurrent (or operational) cost component for the PACS/RIS is associated with maintaining the system(s) in a sustainable operational state. It is also important to consider the service efficiencies, cost savings and service quality improvements that PACS/RIS can generate and include these factors into the economic analysis of any proposal for a PACS/RIS project. Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia 2008-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3097744/ /pubmed/21611017 http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.4.4.e32 Text en © 2008 Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Sim, LH
Budgeting for PACS
title Budgeting for PACS
title_full Budgeting for PACS
title_fullStr Budgeting for PACS
title_full_unstemmed Budgeting for PACS
title_short Budgeting for PACS
title_sort budgeting for pacs
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21611017
http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.4.4.e32
work_keys_str_mv AT simlh budgetingforpacs