Cargando…
Budgeting for PACS
There are a number of models for the acquisition of digital image management systems. The specific details for development of a budget for a PACS/RIS acquisition will depend upon the acquisition model – although there are similarities in the overarching principles and general information, particular...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21611017 http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.4.4.e32 |
_version_ | 1782203881885794304 |
---|---|
author | Sim, LH |
author_facet | Sim, LH |
author_sort | Sim, LH |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are a number of models for the acquisition of digital image management systems. The specific details for development of a budget for a PACS/RIS acquisition will depend upon the acquisition model – although there are similarities in the overarching principles and general information, particularly concerning the radiology service requirements that will drive budget considerations. While budgeting for PACS/RIS should follow the same principles as budgeting for any new technology, it is important to understand how far the implementation of digital image management systems can reach in a healthcare setting. Accurate identification of those elements of the healthcare service that will be affected by a PACS/RIS implementation is a critical component of successful budget formation and of the success of any business case and subsequent project that relies on those budget estimates. A budget for a PACS/RIS capital acquisition project should contain capital and recurrent elements. The capital is associated with the acquisition of the system in a purchase model and capital budget may also be required for upgrade – depending upon a facility’s financial management processes. The recurrent (or operational) cost component for the PACS/RIS is associated with maintaining the system(s) in a sustainable operational state. It is also important to consider the service efficiencies, cost savings and service quality improvements that PACS/RIS can generate and include these factors into the economic analysis of any proposal for a PACS/RIS project. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3097744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30977442011-05-24 Budgeting for PACS Sim, LH Biomed Imaging Interv J Review Article There are a number of models for the acquisition of digital image management systems. The specific details for development of a budget for a PACS/RIS acquisition will depend upon the acquisition model – although there are similarities in the overarching principles and general information, particularly concerning the radiology service requirements that will drive budget considerations. While budgeting for PACS/RIS should follow the same principles as budgeting for any new technology, it is important to understand how far the implementation of digital image management systems can reach in a healthcare setting. Accurate identification of those elements of the healthcare service that will be affected by a PACS/RIS implementation is a critical component of successful budget formation and of the success of any business case and subsequent project that relies on those budget estimates. A budget for a PACS/RIS capital acquisition project should contain capital and recurrent elements. The capital is associated with the acquisition of the system in a purchase model and capital budget may also be required for upgrade – depending upon a facility’s financial management processes. The recurrent (or operational) cost component for the PACS/RIS is associated with maintaining the system(s) in a sustainable operational state. It is also important to consider the service efficiencies, cost savings and service quality improvements that PACS/RIS can generate and include these factors into the economic analysis of any proposal for a PACS/RIS project. Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia 2008-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3097744/ /pubmed/21611017 http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.4.4.e32 Text en © 2008 Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Sim, LH Budgeting for PACS |
title | Budgeting for PACS |
title_full | Budgeting for PACS |
title_fullStr | Budgeting for PACS |
title_full_unstemmed | Budgeting for PACS |
title_short | Budgeting for PACS |
title_sort | budgeting for pacs |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21611017 http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.4.4.e32 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simlh budgetingforpacs |