Cargando…

A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess radiographer familiarity and preferences with digital radiography in four teaching hospitals and thereafter make recommendations in line with the migration from screen film to digital radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nyathi, T, Chirwa, TF, van der Merwe, DG
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21611065
http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.6.1.e5
_version_ 1782203894023061504
author Nyathi, T
Chirwa, TF
van der Merwe, DG
author_facet Nyathi, T
Chirwa, TF
van der Merwe, DG
author_sort Nyathi, T
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess radiographer familiarity and preferences with digital radiography in four teaching hospitals and thereafter make recommendations in line with the migration from screen film to digital radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to collect data from either qualified or student radiographers from four teaching hospitals. From the four teaching hospitals, there were a total of 205 potential respondents. Among other things, responses regarding experiences and preferences with digital radiography, quality control procedures, patient dose, advantages and disadvantages of digital radiography were sought. The information collected was based on self-reporting by the participants. The study is exploratory in nature and descriptive statistics were generated from the collected data using Microsoft Excel 2007 and StatsDirect software. RESULTS: Sixty-three out of 205 (31%) radiographers from all the four radiology centers responded to the circulated questionnaire. Only 15% (8) of the qualified radiographers had 4 or more years of experience with digital radiography compared to 68% (36) for the same amount of experience with screen-film radiography. Sixty-one percent (38) of the participants had been exposed to digital radiography during their lectures while at university. A small proportion, 16% (10) of the respondents underwent formal training in quality control procedures on the digital X-ray units they were using. Slightly more than half (55%) of the participants felt it was easier for them to retake an image in digital radiography than in screen film radiography. CONCLUSION: The results of this survey showed that the participants are familiar with digital radiography and have embraced this relatively new technology as shown by the fact that they can identify both its advantages and disadvantages as applied to clinical practice. However, there are minimal quality control procedures specific to digital radiography being undertaken as such there is need for formal education, continuing education and manufacturer training with respect to quality control as institutions make the transition from conventional screen film radiology to digital radiology.
format Text
id pubmed-3097796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30977962011-05-24 A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study Nyathi, T Chirwa, TF van der Merwe, DG Biomed Imaging Interv J Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess radiographer familiarity and preferences with digital radiography in four teaching hospitals and thereafter make recommendations in line with the migration from screen film to digital radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to collect data from either qualified or student radiographers from four teaching hospitals. From the four teaching hospitals, there were a total of 205 potential respondents. Among other things, responses regarding experiences and preferences with digital radiography, quality control procedures, patient dose, advantages and disadvantages of digital radiography were sought. The information collected was based on self-reporting by the participants. The study is exploratory in nature and descriptive statistics were generated from the collected data using Microsoft Excel 2007 and StatsDirect software. RESULTS: Sixty-three out of 205 (31%) radiographers from all the four radiology centers responded to the circulated questionnaire. Only 15% (8) of the qualified radiographers had 4 or more years of experience with digital radiography compared to 68% (36) for the same amount of experience with screen-film radiography. Sixty-one percent (38) of the participants had been exposed to digital radiography during their lectures while at university. A small proportion, 16% (10) of the respondents underwent formal training in quality control procedures on the digital X-ray units they were using. Slightly more than half (55%) of the participants felt it was easier for them to retake an image in digital radiography than in screen film radiography. CONCLUSION: The results of this survey showed that the participants are familiar with digital radiography and have embraced this relatively new technology as shown by the fact that they can identify both its advantages and disadvantages as applied to clinical practice. However, there are minimal quality control procedures specific to digital radiography being undertaken as such there is need for formal education, continuing education and manufacturer training with respect to quality control as institutions make the transition from conventional screen film radiology to digital radiology. Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia 2010-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3097796/ /pubmed/21611065 http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.6.1.e5 Text en © 2010 Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nyathi, T
Chirwa, TF
van der Merwe, DG
A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study
title A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study
title_full A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study
title_fullStr A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study
title_full_unstemmed A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study
title_short A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study
title_sort survey of digital radiography practice in four south african teaching hospitals: an illuminative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21611065
http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.6.1.e5
work_keys_str_mv AT nyathit asurveyofdigitalradiographypracticeinfoursouthafricanteachinghospitalsanilluminativestudy
AT chirwatf asurveyofdigitalradiographypracticeinfoursouthafricanteachinghospitalsanilluminativestudy
AT vandermerwedg asurveyofdigitalradiographypracticeinfoursouthafricanteachinghospitalsanilluminativestudy
AT nyathit surveyofdigitalradiographypracticeinfoursouthafricanteachinghospitalsanilluminativestudy
AT chirwatf surveyofdigitalradiographypracticeinfoursouthafricanteachinghospitalsanilluminativestudy
AT vandermerwedg surveyofdigitalradiographypracticeinfoursouthafricanteachinghospitalsanilluminativestudy