Cargando…

Review of (18)F-FDG Synthesis and Quality Control

This review article covers a concise account on fludeoxyglucose ((18)F–FDG) synthesis and quality control procedures with emphasis on practical synthesis Currently, (18)F–FDG is the most successful PET radiopharmaceutical so far. The advancement in synthesis and quality control of (18)F–FDG, togethe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Yu, S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21614337
http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.2.4.e57
_version_ 1782203899373944832
author Yu, S
author_facet Yu, S
author_sort Yu, S
collection PubMed
description This review article covers a concise account on fludeoxyglucose ((18)F–FDG) synthesis and quality control procedures with emphasis on practical synthesis Currently, (18)F–FDG is the most successful PET radiopharmaceutical so far. The advancement in synthesis and quality control of (18)F–FDG, together with its approval by the US FDA and the availability of reimbursement, are probably the main reasons for the flourish of clinical PET over the last 20 years. (18)F–FDG can be synthesised by either electrophilic fluorination or nucleophilic fluorination reaction. Nucleophilic fluorination using mannose triflate as precursor and Kryptofix or tetrabutylammonium salts (TBA) is widely used because of higher yield and shorter reaction time. The quality control requirements of (18)F–FDG can be found in United States Pharmacopeia (USP), British Pharmacopeia (BP), European Pharmacopeia (EP) and the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) section from United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) PET draft guidance documents. Basic requirements include radionuclidic identity, radiochemical purity, chemical purity, pH, residual solvent, sterility, and bacterial endotoxin level. Some of these tests (sterility, endotoxins and radionuclidic purity) can be finished after the (18)F–FDG has been released. Although USP, BP and EP do not require filter membrane integrity test, many laboratories perform this test as an indirect evident of the product sterility. It is also interesting to note that there are major differences in (18)F–FDG quality requirements among USP, BP, and CMC.
format Text
id pubmed-3097819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30978192011-05-24 Review of (18)F-FDG Synthesis and Quality Control Yu, S Biomed Imaging Interv J Review Article This review article covers a concise account on fludeoxyglucose ((18)F–FDG) synthesis and quality control procedures with emphasis on practical synthesis Currently, (18)F–FDG is the most successful PET radiopharmaceutical so far. The advancement in synthesis and quality control of (18)F–FDG, together with its approval by the US FDA and the availability of reimbursement, are probably the main reasons for the flourish of clinical PET over the last 20 years. (18)F–FDG can be synthesised by either electrophilic fluorination or nucleophilic fluorination reaction. Nucleophilic fluorination using mannose triflate as precursor and Kryptofix or tetrabutylammonium salts (TBA) is widely used because of higher yield and shorter reaction time. The quality control requirements of (18)F–FDG can be found in United States Pharmacopeia (USP), British Pharmacopeia (BP), European Pharmacopeia (EP) and the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) section from United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) PET draft guidance documents. Basic requirements include radionuclidic identity, radiochemical purity, chemical purity, pH, residual solvent, sterility, and bacterial endotoxin level. Some of these tests (sterility, endotoxins and radionuclidic purity) can be finished after the (18)F–FDG has been released. Although USP, BP and EP do not require filter membrane integrity test, many laboratories perform this test as an indirect evident of the product sterility. It is also interesting to note that there are major differences in (18)F–FDG quality requirements among USP, BP, and CMC. Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia 2006-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3097819/ /pubmed/21614337 http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.2.4.e57 Text en © 2006 Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Yu, S
Review of (18)F-FDG Synthesis and Quality Control
title Review of (18)F-FDG Synthesis and Quality Control
title_full Review of (18)F-FDG Synthesis and Quality Control
title_fullStr Review of (18)F-FDG Synthesis and Quality Control
title_full_unstemmed Review of (18)F-FDG Synthesis and Quality Control
title_short Review of (18)F-FDG Synthesis and Quality Control
title_sort review of (18)f-fdg synthesis and quality control
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3097819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21614337
http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.2.4.e57
work_keys_str_mv AT yus reviewof18ffdgsynthesisandqualitycontrol