Cargando…
Controversy in the treatment of symptomatic internal rectal prolapse: suspension or resection?
Autores principales: | Festen, S., van Geloven, A. A. W., D’Hoore, A., Lindsey, I., Gerhards, M. F. |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3098348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21140169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1501-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Readmission after rectal resection in the ERAS-era: is a loop ileostomy the Achilles heel?
por: Van Butsele, Johanna, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Laparoscopic Vaginal Suspension and Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse
por: Yang, Shi-Jun, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery for internal rectal prolapse
por: Bloemendaal, A. L. A., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Health-related quality of life in rectal cancer: a topic more relevant now than ever
por: Wolthuis, Albert M, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Functional outcome after perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse
por: Hetzer, Franc H, et al.
Publicado: (2010)